Pierce Morgan asked the wrong scholar about homosexuality (Dr. Browne)

valet

The official Chaplain of the Coli
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
26,425
Reputation
4,735
Daps
57,137
Reppin
Detroit
Dumbass is comparing incest which is GENETICALLY unfavorable to addressing homosexuality itself among consensual adults.
Genetically unfavorable because of incest kids can come out retarded? Is that what you mean?
 

Odyssey

Banned
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
608
Reputation
-330
Daps
251
Reppin
NULL
1. Sounds like you don't truly understand nihilism
2. Sounds like you're saying nihilism is bad
3. What does believing in factually inaccurate and blatantly untrue stories have to do with the development of a morality that works for most people?

Nihilism is a bad thing. It makes the world into a orderless, chaotic mess. Nihilism will lead to communities that produce narcissistic individuals that will fight for group or individual interest rather than of God, community and country.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,257
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,022
Reppin
The Deep State
Nihilism is a bad thing
except...its the only thing.

However, from it, we can make our own meaning and move forward...thus existentialism.

if you're gonna believe in bullshyt, make sure its true.

It makes the world into a orderless, chaotic mess.
mere speculation at best
Nihilism will lead to communities that produce narcissistic individuals that will fight for group or individual interest
1. why is that bad?
2. how is that worse than what we have now?
rather than of God,
your god doesn't exist.
community
i am open to hearing how nihilism doesn't suppor this
and country.
I support the notion of nation-states...the world is only gonna get smaller and I want mine.

Its funny you reject "narcissism" yet suggest that nation-states and "community" are preferable :heh:
 

valet

The official Chaplain of the Coli
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
26,425
Reputation
4,735
Daps
57,137
Reppin
Detroit
It doesn't and frankly...I'm not sure about that.

If it was up to me...i say go for it.
And you should if your worldview is that "consenting adults" is the criteria for marriage. But that's not consistent with many who claim that's the only criteria. Thus, the point of why Piers avoided the question. If his "why should you have more rights" then other people. Then logically that should apply to gay brothers. But it doesn't. And he knows it.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
It's been underway for a long time. Anything with "humanism" in the name sounds good to most people, but they don't understand how utterly nihilistic and bankrupt "post enlightenment humanism" really is.

I think what you are referring to is the inevitable march of modern capitalist "ethics." Karl Marx predicted that capitalism would destroy communities and traditional value systems and replace them with its own atomistic individualism and market exchange value, and he was right. Your classical liberalism is incompatible with the conservative communities you want.

Nihilism is a bad thing. It makes the world into a orderless, chaotic mess. Nihilism will lead to communities that produce narcissistic individuals that will fight for group or individual interest rather than of God, community and country.

Religion didn't invent the idea of community. We're social animals- it's in our evolutionary heritage.

this makes no sense.
Christianity is the backbone of laws in western civilization.
No, it's not. Western civilization is part Christian, part Greek. Even the Christian part is part Greek. And now, post-enlightenment, we have a new set of ideas to operate with, ones free of the residue of the older stuff.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,257
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,022
Reppin
The Deep State
And you should if your worldview is that "consenting adults" is the criteria for marriage. But that's not consistent with many who claim that's the only criteria. Thus, the point of why Piers avoided the question. If his "why should you have more rights" then other people. Then logically that should apply to gay brothers. But it doesn't. And he knows it.

The problem with talk-shows is that they're on strict time limits. If you can't snip your point down then you're better off not talking without going into some long spiel...thats why podcasts are growing in popularity...

That being said... I don't care if its not consistent. There are somethings i'm willing to allow and somethings i'm not.

I'm all down for grown adults doing what they want to do, but I can't, in the interest of the GENETIC wellbeing of the child, support direct incest.

If you're asking for incest to be granted legal autonomy, I won't condone it.
 
Top