I'm a Yankee fan and I think Cano in the top 4 is comical.
Why? Hard to get that production from a solid/good 2B.
I'm a Yankee fan and I think Cano in the top 4 is comical.
Yes, he has more innings. Assuming Kershaw throws tomorrow, I'm guessing he'll finish with 7-8 more innings on the season....or about 1 start. Certainly worth something, but it's not a huge number. And yes, he has more strikeouts...but Kershaw has the higher K/9 and K%. And the lower WHIP. So it's very, very close.
And for those people who loved the "September games mean more" angle, Kershaw has a 1.74 ERA in his last 8 starts with the Dodgers battling to stay in contention (.67 in his last 4). This would be the only time I agree with this line of reasoning though...when things are otherwise incredibly close.
But, like I said...it's there is no wrong answer.
....as for the bolded. Here are some facts for you.
R.A. dikkey left 9 runners on base this year when he left games. The Mets bullpen allowed 3 of them to score.
Clayton Kershaw also left 9 runners on base this year when he left games. The Dodgers bullpen allowed 6 of them to score.
OK, so dikkey now has had more offensive support and his bullpen has performed better. Next argument?
Why? Hard to get that production from a solid/good 2B.
I refuse to believe you're this stupid.
First, my argument is not based on WAR. It's based on evaluating a players FULL contribution to his team...not just comparing them as hitters.
You only think it's circular because you don't understand what that means and are a functioning illiterate.
You keep responding to my COUNTERARGUMENTS like they're my arguments...which is assbackwards.
If someone says "Cabrera should be MVP because the Tigers are in the playoffs" and I say "they're only in the playoffs because they play in an inferior division"....that is NOT the same as me saying "Cabrera shouldn't be MVP because the Tigers play in an inferior division."
This is pretty simple stuff. Try to keep up.
Mike who?