GhostoftheMan
Superstar
Clyde's barbershop stories
thought it was obviousSo instead of naming specific moves he made you just generalize the whole season because of the end result. Got you.
Don't even watch that shyt everyone looked like shyt except for GrantI'm missing the game
Any highlights?
So now we're saying we should've kept Chandlerthought it was obvious
but trading chandler (though i agree he needed to be traded) for dalembert and calderon was a horrible move even before the season started
dalembart was waived in januart and hasnt been picked up since
calderon
did nothing but add cap
trading jr and shump (again, dont have a problem with the actual move) for weak ass second rounders was also a horrible move
he could and should of gone more for them.
quincy acy flop
larkin flop
he gets for signing jason smith ( but didnt resign him) and he gets credit for galloway but thats it
what did he do dat was good?
i clearly said i had no problem with us trading chandler what are you talking about?So now we're saying we should've kept Chandler
We're naming trades made to intentionally makes us worse as bad moves?
Larkin was got for cheap and he was a 1 yr deal
Quincy Acy came and did what he was supposed to do and ended up being one of our better players by years end
How can you say you don't have problems with a move and in the same breath call it a horrible move
So basically, he had a bad year because he said he wanted us to make a push for the playoffs and that got derailed after Calderón got hurt.i clearly said i had no problem with us trading chandler what are you talking about?
and yes, i have no problem with us wanting to trade the players we traded. But i have a problem with who we got back in exchange, why is that hard to understand
phil said after the chandler trades dat we were gonna be a better team and make the playoffs, why are you ignoring that
If you were following him blindly before, thats your reason to stop