Is there a spoon??
Is there a spoon??
No, only strings that vibrate to create the illusion of a spoon.
i just remembered that sohh thread on scientists finding that equation and basically saying we might be living in a supercomputer in the future like fukking vanilla sky omg i just wanna find out how to shape my reality one day imma find out i swear
fair enough hulkster, ill wait for a theory of your own rather than mere complaints of mine...
BROTHER YOU HAVEN'T PUT FORTH A THEORY YET, BROTHER! YOU'VE STATED, WITHOUT ANY SUPPORT, THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE UNIVERSE AND NOTHINGNESS, DUUUDE! BUT YOU BASED THESE PREMISES ON NOTHING, BROTHER! THAT'S NOT A COMPLAINT, MAAAN! THAT'S JUST AN OBSERVATION, MEAN GENE!
AND NOW THAT THE HULKSTER THINKS ABOUT IT WHILE FLEXING THE BIGGEST ARMS IN THE WORLD, I DID PUT FORTH MY VIEW ON THE MIND, BROTHER! IT'S A FUNCTION OF THE BRAIN AND THIS CONCLUSION IS WELL-SUPPORTED BY THE CONSENSUS OF NEUROSCIENCE AND THE EVIDENCE GATHERED THEREBY, BROTHER! CORRECT ME IF I'M MISTAKEN, MY MAN!
A widely supported hypothesis in modern physics is the zero-energy universe which states that the total amount of energy in the universe is exactly zero. That is the only kind of universe that could come from nothing.[16][17] Such a universe would have to be flat in shape, a state which does not contradict current observations that the Universe is flat with a 0.5% margin of error.[
^ If the mind is not a function of the brain then why do some people undergo drastic changes to their identity/self when suffering from brain damage?
Used to be really into it, thats where I got my user name haha.
I believe free will is an illusion. It is my belief that we do not posses the mental capacity to truly understand the relation between Cause and Effect down to the smallest unit of measurement. Everything we perceive and every action we take is merely the effect of a previous action so complex that we determine it it simply free will.
I believe free will is an illusion. It is my belief that we do not posses the mental capacity to truly understand the relation between Cause and Effect down to the smallest unit of measurement. Everything we perceive and every action we take is merely the effect of a previous action so complex that we determine it it simply free will. This being said I do believe in an impersonal god.... *lights up another bowl*
good post.
but you think the fact we dont fully understand the origins or the complex nature of our urges and therefore our choices, COMPLETELY discounts the idea of free will to the point where it's illusion? im emphasizing completely because it seems we still control much in our lives through the choices we make.
i do agree though, the infinite complexity of cause and effect as its happening on a universal scale can make this conversation overwhelming. but i also dont think we can discount personal choice and the amount of control we have over the direction of our lives.
See, posts like these are why I don't like talking about free will just off the top.
For me, when dealing in theory or philosophy, you first have to determine some type of base or reference point regarding what you're philosophizing about. Otherwise, you end up dealing with sliding definitions, or debating at cross purposes, and that's never good for understanding, synthesis, etc.
Not to say that you two are doing this, but it just provided a good example of talking about such a complex topic in a well-reasoned manner, but also in a total vacuum, which I dislike.
What do you mean when you say "free will"? Are we talking within a given structure? Are we actually talking about free will in that vacuum? Because without that definition or reference point, I can't answer the question, largely because any given definition of "free will" must adhere to world in which we exist. And there are cultural, societal, ideological structures which always already limit us in that world.
So basically, I need a definition before I answer the question, because my answer vitally depends on it.