The terms Hispanic and Latino have always been trick bags used to obscure the black roots of Latin Americans.
Yep
Yall keep falling for and propagating this dumb shyt......
Hispanic - is a multi racial linguistic term
Latin America(Latinos) - is a multi racial geopolitical region
You might as well say...
Census Estimate: U.S. southerner Population is 2rd Largest in the Americas at 120 MillionDon't get me wrong you can compare anything I can compare you to a brick provided I state what attributes I'm comparing. That said the comparisons are always ridiculous. My favorite is Latinos don't all vote for the same people see we(as in African Americans) need to do that also. Fool Latinos don't vote for the same party for the same reason southerners don't vote for the same party. There is a variety of subgroups(national, racial, ethnic, etc) with different political experiences; of course all Latinos aren't going to vote the same way
2018
Region...Population...Percentage
Northeast....56,111,079.....17.2%
Midwest......68,308,744.....20.9%
West...........77,993,663.....23.8%
South........124,753,948.....38.1%
United States Population Growth by Region
EXAMPLE: If the "south" is a geopolitical term designating a land region and "southerner" is a term designating multiple races of people from that geographic area why should I as an African American get up in arms ...especially when damn near half the population of "southerners" are African American?
For the short bus people a geopolitical region, linguistic group, and racial group are all distinct things.
The only thing that would make sense to compare Latinos to are something like "Southerners", "New Englanders", etc ...not a racial group
(Remember the idea of a "Latino" / "Hispanic" is an american demographer creation ...that yall keep falling for)