Personality wise, whats the difference between Dwight and Embiid?

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
84,631
Reputation
9,225
Daps
228,821
Show him how to play with another top 15 player and be flirting with a .500 record? :scust:.
I'd like to see how effective Embiid would be with another big who soaks up the majority of possessions and camps in the paint; leaving him with secondary touches and considerably less time of possession, all the while forced to take perimeter shots to provide spacing for the team.

:mjgrin:
Show him how to play like an SF? :scust:
AD does whatever's necessary, so that his teammates can maximize their skillsets, and not pigeonhole them into playing around his. It's funny how you mention AD playing like an SF, when Embiid takes 40% more 3-pointers than he does.

:mjgrin:
If you gonna talk bigs with me, they better have an actual post game, I'm not here to discuss small forwards beloved.
Perhaps if Embiid actually used his post game, and stopped trying to be the "James Harden of the bigs", he wouldn't be turning the ball over and throwing up errant shots down the stretch.

:mjgrin:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,139
Daps
279,724
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
I'd like to see how effective Embiid would be with another big who soaks up the majority of possessions and camps in the paint; leaving him with secondary touches and considerably less time of possession, all the while forced to take perimeter shots to provide spacing for the team.

:mjgrin:

Play with the 2nd best center in the league and look for excuses :mjgrin: I'd like to see Embiid with another top 15 player, I'm sure things would somehow be more difficult for him :mjlol:





AD does whatever's necessary, so that his teammates can maximize their skillsets, and not pigeonhole them into playing around his. It's funny how you mention AD playing like an SF, when Embiid takes 40% more 3-pointers than he does.

:mjgrin:

Sixers move the ball more than the Pelicans, it's Embiid's fault he's a true low post threat that can score on his own? AD is assisted on more of his shots than the Young Gawd.

Which one of them leads the league in points in the post? :mjgrin:






Perhaps if Embiid actually used his post game, and stopped trying to be the "James Harden of the bigs", he wouldn't be turning the ball over and throwing up errant shots down the stretch.

:mjgrin:



10ppg in the post, tell me how many AD scores in the post :mjgrin:


You skating on thin ice, your Embiid slander may have me forming the coalition, hit you with so many alerts you catch a seizure :mjgrin:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
84,631
Reputation
9,225
Daps
228,821
Play with the 2nd best center in the league and look for excuses :mjgrin: I'd like to see Embiid with another top 15 player, I'm sure things would somehow be more difficult for him :mjlol:
You'd like to see Embiid play next to a center who has more total touches, front court touches* and higher time of possession than any big man in the league?

:usure::mjgrin:
Sixers move the ball more than the Pelicans, it's Embiid's fault he's a true low post threat that can score on his own? AD is assisted on more of his shots than the Young Gawd.
So what you're saying is, Embiid has it easier than AD because of the system he's in?

:mjgrin:
Which one of them leads the league in points in the post? :mjgrin:
Points per post-up possession -

AD - 1.00 points
Embiid - 0.97 points

Scoring frequency in post-ups -

AD - 49.7%
Embiid - 49.4%

Percentile -

AD - 79.7
Embiid - 72.4

So despite the ONE supposed clear advantage Embiid has over AD, not only is AD ranked a greater percentile in post-ups, has a higher points per post-up possession and conversion rate, but he does this all without getting a ton of post-ups opportunities like Embiid does.

Which one of them averages the most points?
Which one of them averages the most points per paint touch?
Which one of them averages the most points per elbow touch?
Which one of them averages the most points per touch?
Which one of them shoots a higher FG%?
Which one of them shoots a higher 3-pt%
Which one of them shoots a higher TS%?
Which one of them shoots a higher FT%?
Which one of them averages more blocks per game?
Which one of them averages more steals per game?

:mjgrin:
You skating on thin ice, your Embiid slander may have me forming the coalition, hit you with so many alerts you catch a seizure :mjgrin:
tenor.gif


:mjgrin:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,139
Daps
279,724
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
You'd like to see Embiid play next to a center who has more total touches, front court touches* and higher time of possession than any big man in the league?

:usure::mjgrin:


Yes, I live this post life, put them both on the floor together :wtf:



So what you're saying is, Embiid has it easier than AD because of the system he's in?

:mjgrin:

Embiid is the system, nice try :mjgrin:

We know what the Sixers look like with and without him, are you saying that AD is now a sidekick? Which would make him the ideal number 2 to the young gawd, since he's already deferring to a player who isn't as good as the Prince of the Post? :mjgrin:


Points per post-up possession -

AD - 1.00 points
Embiid - 0.97 points

Scoring frequency in post-ups -

AD - 49.7%
Embiid - 49.4%

Percentile -

AD - 79.7
Embiid - 72.4

So despite the ONE supposed clear advantage Embiid has over AD, not only is AD ranked a greater percentile in post-ups, has a higher points per post-up possession and conversion rate, but he does this all without getting a ton of post-ups opportunities like Embiid does.

Which one of them averages the most points?
Which one of them averages the most points per paint touch?
Which one of them averages the most points per elbow touch?
Which one of them averages the most points per touch?
Which one of them shoots a higher FG%?
Which one of them shoots a higher 3-pt%
Which one of them shoots a higher TS%?
Which one of them shoots a higher FT%?
Which one of them averages more blocks per game?
Which one of them averages more steals per game?

:mjgrin:

The fluffed up stats that only paint a picture you want and don't take into account frequency, never thought I'd see the day you'd try that on me :wow: Davis posts up 20.9% of the time, Young Gawd leads the league in posts up at 44% frequency. Are we really about to act like Davis would be as efficient in the post if he did it almost 25% more and had to do it with Ben Simmons on the floor :mjlol: He didn't post up before Cousins got there, so please don't use the Boogie excuse, there is only 1 Young Gawd and prince of post in the league and it's JoJo.

And blocks/scoring per game? Embiid plays 5 less minutes per game, your hate is clouding your judgement right now.





nino-brown-sit-down-o.gif



Don't make me do it to you breh, I don't think you understand I have attained a new level and unlocked new powers. The coalition isn't just the posters who you've made enemies of in the Seum, I've been helping posters make thousands in the other thread, they would gladly do my wetwork for me if the Joel Embiid disrespect doesn't stop. I will do it to protect the Young Gawds honor from those who once called him Hakeem, yet have now turned cold with snake like betrayals of trust.
 

Blackrogue

Superstar
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
14,033
Reputation
4,312
Daps
46,666
Reppin
Nai
Embiid is more competitive.

I don't think Dwight is done like people act like he is. His numbers are good. But Offensively they are not on the same tier since Dwight hasnt learnt any post moves his entire career while embiid already is amazing.

Kobe was on Dwight cause he didnt think Dwight wanted to compete and was soft. Those are things embiid is not. Plus I think from the type of jokes you can see embiid is more intelligent. Embiid is mentally tougher or got thicker skin. Embiid graps things quicker
 

Blackrogue

Superstar
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
14,033
Reputation
4,312
Daps
46,666
Reppin
Nai
People loved dwight though..The real turning point for Dwight was the Sour last season in Orlando... But they still didn't care. Then he went to Lakers and kobe was visibly frustrated with him.. so his competitiveness began to be questioned. But still he was coming off a major injury. . Then Houston with harden.. And they under achieved.. Then went to his home town and they were nothing special and his dumbass was busy trying the three ball. In Charlotte he's aight.

So I don't think people turned on Howard because of his jokes.. But more so elements of his personality like his intelligence, competitiveness. He had a hot start to his career and people expected more down the line but he didn't deliver for almost four seasons now. I think if you dull your expectations for him, and look at him as a defensive anchor and get a good price for him, you may appreciate him. But the game has also changed to appreciate spacing which he doesn't bring
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
84,631
Reputation
9,225
Daps
228,821
Yes, I live this post life, put them both on the floor together :wtf:
:usure:

You'd soon be fed up with Embiid not getting enough touches, and being forced to play out on the perimeter. How would Embiid fare dealing with secondary/split touches and time of possession, where he would have to make do with a limited amount of possessions, which would impact his rhythm and opportunities to score when/where/how he wanted to?

Embiid averages 92 touches per 36 minutes
Davis averages 68 touches per 36 minutes

Embiid's time of possession is 3.4 minutes per 36 minutes
Davis' time of possession is 2.3 minutes per 36 minutes

Now you tell me how is Embiid going to be productive/efficient while dealing with a drastic drop in touches/TOP, as well as less spacing and perimeter help? How would this affect Boogie's game, where he'd need to cut down his touches/TOP too? How would it affect Boogie's balance of energy as he'd need to exert more energy on defense (particularly on the perimeter, as he'd need to take on some of AD's defensive roles)? How would it affect the overall success of the team with two frontcourt players who're most effective in the same spaces?
The fluffed up stats that only paint a picture you want and don't take into account frequency, never thought I'd see the day you'd try that on me :wow:
Just seeing if you'd bite on that jab-step. :troll:


Davis posts up 20.9% of the time, Young Gawd leads the league in posts up at 44% frequency. Are we really about to act like Davis would be as efficient in the post if he did it almost 25% more
I didn't reference those stats to insinuate AD was a better post player or even had an equal post skillset to Embiid's. It was just to illustrate that AD is one of the best performing post players thus far. Now, quite obviously AD would be unlikely to maintain his current efficiency/percentile if he was asked to increase his post possessions equal to the same rate as Embiid, but I don't think there'd be any discernible drop to the point where his #s wouldn't be comparable to Embiid's.

Which brings me to my next point, AD doesn't have the luxury of getting the ball when he has a matchup advantage in the post to the same degree that Embiid does, he has to make do with secondary post touches because Boogie occupies the majority of them. He doesn't get the ball in the post to develop a rhythm to the same degree that Embiid does. He doesn't get the ball in the post on resets to the same degree Embiid does either.

And blocks/scoring per game? Embiid plays 5 less minutes per game, your hate is clouding your judgement right now.
And that's another issue, how the hell would Embiid be able to replicate what AD does defensively (AD covers more ground on defense than any other big man in the league), when a considerable increase in minutes would affect his efficiency/productivity on the offensive end? The main thing you're looking over here is that AD can still have elite offensive impact (with the bare minimum of touches) while fitting seamlessly next to any type of big man, and letting them maximize their skillset, while doing whatever's necessary on the defensive end, be that rim protection or defending out on the perimeter - in accordance to what his frontcourt mate is least capable in.

Is Embiid capable of doing the same at this stage of his career?

:jbhmm:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,139
Daps
279,724
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
:usure:

You'd soon be fed up with Embiid not getting enough touches, and being forced to play out on the perimeter. How would Embiid fare dealing with secondary/split touches and time of possession, where he would have to make do with a limited amount of possessions, which would impact his rhythm and opportunities to score when/where/how he wanted to?

Embiid averages 92 touches per 36 minutes
Davis averages 68 touches per 36 minutes

Embiid's time of possession is 3.4 minutes per 36 minutes
Davis' time of possession is 2.3 minutes per 36 minutes

Now you tell me how is Embiid going to be productive/efficient while dealing with a drastic drop in touches/TOP, as well as less spacing and perimeter help? How would this affect Boogie's game, where he'd need to cut down his touches/TOP too? How would it affect Boogie's balance of energy as he'd need to exert more energy on defense (particularly on the perimeter, as he'd need to take on some of AD's defensive roles)? How would it affect the overall success of the team with two frontcourt players who're most effective in the same spaces?


:leon: This sure sounds like all the questions about whether Boogie and Davis can play together. Sorry, but Embiid currently has a 6'10" Rondo on his team that refuses to shoot anything beyond 5 feet, if he can function with that on the floor he can function with Euro Boog who takes almost as many threes a game as Redikk.


And why are you assuming Embiid would be the one that would need to adjust to Cousins? He's the better player between he and Cousins, and most importantly I said Davis would be the number 2 to Embiid, he's essentially already doing that with a lesser player, differing shots to Boogie and letting Boogie dominate the offense, imagine if Embiid had a sidekick like Davis :mjgrin:





I didn't reference those stats to insinuate AD was a better post player or even had an equal post skillset to Embiid's. It was just to illustrate that AD is one of the best performing post players thus far. Now, quite obviously AD would be unlikely to maintain his current efficiency/percentile if he was asked to increase his post possessions equal to the same rate as Embiid, but I don't think there'd be any discernible drop to the point where his #s wouldn't be comparable to Embiid's.


No, frequency matters and you and I both know it was a dishonest play, no different than someone trying to paint Buddy Hield out as a comparable shooter to Curry because he's hitting 44% on half as many attempts as Steph. Davis and post work should never be compared to Embiids, never in any fashion should they be compared especially since we can go look at pre-Boogie numbers to see how Davis did in the post and it's a joke by comparison.


Which brings me to my next point, AD doesn't have the luxury of getting the ball when he has a matchup advantage in the post to the same degree that Embiid does, he has to make do with secondary post touches because Boogie occupies the majority of them. He doesn't get the ball in the post to develop a rhythm to the same degree that Embiid does. He doesn't get the ball in the post on resets to the same degree Embiid does either.

Stop it beloved, he was a play finisher before Cousins got there, don't try and paint this out to Davis not being in the post cause Cousins is there. He's always been the guy who has been assisted on his shots, we can look at his numbers before Cousins even got there -

Percentage of Davis shots assisted -

13-14
67%

14-15
71%

15-16
74%

16-17
66%


There isn't some godly post player there waiting to be unleashed, he doesn't like playing in the post to begin with. The year before Cousins got there he posted up 18% of the time, you not about to run the what if game here. There's more than enough data from before Boogie got there to show that Davis in the post wasn't ever going to happen.

And that's another issue, how the hell would Embiid be able to replicate what AD does defensively (AD covers more ground on defense than any other big man in the league), when a considerable increase in minutes would affect his efficiency/productivity on the offensive end? The main thing you're looking over here is that AD can still have elite offensive impact (with the bare minimum of touches) while fitting seamlessly next to any type of big man, and letting them maximize their skillset, while doing whatever's necessary on the defensive end, be that rim protection or defending out on the perimeter - in accordance to what his frontcourt mate is least capable in.

Is Embiid capable of doing the same at this stage of his career?

:jbhmm:


You keep trying to frame this as Embiid being Boogie's sidekick, if anyone has to adjust it's Boogie. Also, I said Davis would be a great sidekick to Embiid and you've done nothing but strengthen that argument by pointing out he's letting Cousins dominate the offense :mjgrin: So why then would he not let another dominant personality do the same to him again when you've just painted him out to be the ultimate number 2. I don't care about who covers more ground, Embiid is a better defensive anchor and has two white dudes on the floor, one of which is a short armed Euro PF playing next to him. You can talk about versatility, I'll talk about results, the Sixers look like hot trash on defense when the Young Gawd is out, they're top 5 with him on the floor, while all that covering ground for AD got the Pelicans in the 24th spot defensively.


You're going off on this about Boogie/Embiid pairing, when the first post I said Davis -
Imagine the Sixers record if he had a strong number 2 like Anthony Davis :wow:


:mjgrin: I know why you're trying so hard to make the Cousins/Embiid thing stick, but my first post already said I'd love to see Davis as Embiid's number 2.
 

kingofnyc

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,926
Reputation
1,249
Daps
54,079
Reppin
Boogie Down BX
I'm just speaking in general terms here.

Folks found Dwight funny once upon a time when there was hope of him becoming the next great big (@kingofnyc probably still does), but that soon changed as the perception around his game did. Those "funny" qualities become grating and tiresome because you couldn't attach them to great play. Nobody likes players who have out there personalities who fail to live up to the hype - they become the joke. Just like how folks may find Embiid funny now, because he gives them hope of seeing the next great big man. If he can't stay healthy, or he fails to live up to his hype, nikkas will turn on him too.

You think you'll be laughing at Embiid's humor of clowning players just the same, if he too finds himself in the same boat of players who haven't proven shyt?


:mjgrin:

dwight was never funny
embiid isn’t currently funny
and i thought shaq wasn’t funny either back in da day


i only started rooting for D12 when the whole sport world began to shyt on him YET give chris paul, deron williams, carmelo anthony & kevin love all passes for basically doing the same shyt
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
84,631
Reputation
9,225
Daps
228,821
:leon: This sure sounds like all the questions about whether Boogie and Davis can play together. .
The Boogie/AD frontcourt only works because Davis is capable of working around Boogie, while still having elite impact. A Boogie/Embiid frontcourt most probably wouldn't, because neither have the shown the capability of playing around a dominant-possession frontcourt partner, because it goes directly against their style of play, respective skillsets and conditioning.
Sorry, but Embiid currently has a 6'10" Rondo on his team that refuses to shoot anything beyond 5 feet, if he can function with that on the floor he can function with Euro Boog who takes almost as many threes a game as Redikk.
:gucci:

Simmons' activity is mainly on the perimeter -- playmaking -- that's what his first, second and third inclination is. Boogie's touches/TOP is mostly about him trying to generate offense for himself, and not others. It's not just about how many threes Boogie takes, it's about how much he monopolizes the ball for himself, and the areas where (in the low post/paint) he's mainly stationed in. Simmons isn't in the low post/paint demanding touches for himself.

First, you turn your nose up at AD playing like a "SF" (when it's out of necessity in order for the AD/Boogie frontcourt to function properly, because Boogie needs his touches), but in the next breath you're claiming that Embiid would have no issue playing with Boogie, when one of them would need to play like AD. You can bet your bottom dollar that Boogie wouldn't be the one to replicate shyt AD does all over the floor on both ends, while dealing with limited possessions, so basically that would leave Embiid to pick most of the "SF" slack.
And why are you assuming Embiid would be the one that would need to adjust to Cousins? He's the better player between he and Cousins,
:usure::mjgrin:

Except being the better player can mean you have to adjust your play because others are incapable of doing so, you should know this after Duncan has pretty much adjusted throughout most of his career. Or are you admitting here and now that Duncan was never the best player on the Spurs from the mid-00s onwards (careful now, I may have to get @CantStop to start taking photo evidence)?

Embiid would need to adjust (well, he'd be the one that would need to adjust the most) because like I said above, Boogie's impact is significantly limited if he doesn't have the ball in his hands and isn't getting the majority of possessions.
No, frequency matters and you and I both know it was a dishonest play, no different than someone trying to paint Buddy Hield out as a comparable shooter to Curry because he's hitting 44% on half as many attempts as Steph. Davis and post work should never be compared to Embiids, never in any fashion should they be compared especially since we can go look at pre-Boogie numbers to see how Davis did in the post and it's a joke by comparison.
Frequency does matter, I've already acknowledged so in the previous post. Your Buddy/Curry shooting comparison doesn't make sense in this context, and here's why - AD is a greater and more versatile scorer than Embiid is (whereas Buddy's not even in the basketball caste as Curry), therefore he could handle MORE post possessions and not have a notable drop in efficiency in relation to Embiid, because of his abilities. Again, I must reiterate, AD's doesn't get a wealth of post possessions because it's out of necessity for the functionality and success of the team.

His #s numbers weren't great in past seasons mostly due to the fact that he was in his early 20s ( his post game has evolved since then), and was predominantly used in face-up situations.
Stop it beloved, he was a play finisher before Cousins got there, don't try and paint this out to Davis not being in the post cause Cousins is there. He's always been the guy who has been assisted on his shots, we can look at his numbers before Cousins even got there -

Percentage of Davis shots assisted -

13-14
67%

14-15
71%

15-16
74%

16-17
66%
:francis:

Now, who's coming with the "dishonest plays"; assisted shots aren't directly indicative of a player's inability to create for himself, but more so the role one has on the team and the system of play. You're making it seem like he needs his offense fed to him, as if he's incapable of generating it on his own. Players who can put up 30 any given night clearly don't deserve to be squared into that box. Nevermind the fact that he's still progressing and adding to his offensive game.
There isn't some godly post player there waiting to be unleashed, he doesn't like playing in the post to begin with. The year before Cousins got there he posted up 18% of the time, you not about to run the what if game here.
Because he's typically been used and accustomed to being a face-up player. I'm not saying that he's going to evolve into a "godly post player" or anything of the sort, partly because it'd go directly against his versatility - he's never going to be just one type of scorer; he'll score in any fashion that the team needs him to.
There's more than enough data from before Boogie got there to show that Davis in the post wasn't ever going to happen..
:ohhh:

Weren't you arguing against the notion that one shouldn't try to box players in at a young age? Now here you are saying that an early 20s, all-time talent wasn't ever going to add post-scoring to his game. Sounds like to me @Malta isn't keeping up with his preach and practice.

:mjgrin:
You keep trying to frame this as Embiid being Boogie's sidekick, if anyone has to adjust it's Boogie.
If you think Boogie's capable of assuming the roles(s) of AD, well you'd be in for a rude awakening.

:mjgrin:
and you've done nothing but strengthen that argument by pointing out he's letting Cousins dominate the offense :mjgrin:
:dwillhuh:

How so, when Cousins is incapable of playing off the ball, and needs touches/heavy TOP to develop rhythm and stay engaged in the game on both ends of the floor (you've seen how often he mentally checks out when things don't go his way, just imagine parlaying that with the line of him not getting the ball when he wanted to; forced to stand out on the perimeter while Embiid is in the post). You think if you took all that away from him and made him have secondary touches to another big man he'd have any great impact on the game? Of course not. His efficency would suffer, his defense and engagement level would suffer even more.
I don't care about who covers more ground, Embiid is a better defensive anchor and has two white dudes on the floor, one of which is a short armed Euro PF playing next to him. You can talk about versatility, I'll talk about results, the Sixers look like hot trash on defense when the Young Gawd is out, they're top 5 with him on the floor, while all that covering ground for AD got the Pelicans in the 24th spot defensively.
The 76ers are probably the most hardest-working/hustle team in the league, who don't have an adequate defensive big to replace Embiid when he's off the floor. You replace him with AD and the 76ers would probably be better on defense, you replace AD with Embiid on the Pelicans and they get worse on that end.

You wanna know why the Pelicans are 24th in DRTG, it's mostly because of Boogie - AD is the main reason why it's not any worse. The Pelicans are 10 points better on defense when AD is on the floor, that is one of the best marks in the league out of all defensive anchors; the 76ers are only 7 points betters on defense when Embiid is on the floor.

Who the hell is gonna do all the dirty work and run around all over the halfcourt of the defensive end out of Boogie and Embiid?

:mjgrin:
 
Last edited:

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,139
Daps
279,724
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
The Boogie/AD frontcourt only works because Davis is capable of working around Boogie, while still having elite impact. A Boogie/Embiid frontcourt most probably wouldn't, because neither have the shown the capability of playing around a dominant-possession frontcourt partner, because it goes directly against their style of play, respective skillsets and conditioning.


No, it works because they're both top 15 players, trying to say it wouldn't work with Boogie/Embiid is you just saying so, there's nothing to back up that claim. We'll never know one way or the other, so just as easily as you say it probably wouldn't work, I can say it probably would work because at the end of the day talent matters. We've reached an impasse, people thought the Boogie/Davis pairing wouldn't work :yeshrug: And we've seen Boogie play next to other centers (Koufous, WCS) who weren't nearly as talented as the Young Gawd.


:gucci:

Simmons' activity is mainly on the perimeter -- playmaking -- that's what his first, second and third inclination is. Boogie's touches/TOP is mostly about him trying to generate offense for himself, and not others. It's not just about how many threes Boogie takes, it's about how much he monopolizes the ball for himself, and the areas where (in the low post/paint) he's mainly stationed in. Simmons isn't in the low post/paint demanding touches for himself.

The point is Simmons cannot shoot, him being on the floor with Embiid makes things more difficult for the Gawd at times, as he often cuts to the rim from the weakside when the Young Gawd has the ball in the post. His man will also drop back and give him a 93 foot cushion when he doesn't have the ball, Embiid is learning to deal with doubles from the post because of this. Boogie being able to shoot and stretch the floor would work fine with Embiid, again why would Embiid be the one to change his game when he's better than Cousins? :wtf:

First, you turn your nose up at AD playing like a "SF" (when it's out of necessity in order for the AD/Boogie frontcourt to function properly, because Boogie needs his touches), but in the next breath you're claiming that Embiid would have no issue playing with Boogie, when one of them would need to play like AD. You can bet your bottom dollar that Boogie wouldn't be the one to replicate shyt AD does all over the floor on both ends, while dealing with limited possessions, so basically that would leave Embiid to pick most of the "SF" slack.


Nope, prove unequivocally that Embiid would have to change his game, you can't, we can only speculate :mjgrin:

Why would Embiid need to adopt the "SF" role when Cousins is the better catch & shoot / catch and drive player?


Except being the better player can mean you have to adjust your play because others are incapable of doing so, you should know this after Duncan has pretty much adjusted throughout most of his career. Or are you admitting here and now that Duncan was never the best player on the Spurs from the mid-00s onwards (careful now, I may have to get @CantStop to start taking photo evidence)?

Tim only adjusted his game when he was older, he already had 3 finals MVPs and 2 MVPs, when have I ever said Tim was still in his prime after 07? What I have said is that his longevity gives him the edge over other players.

And wow, you calling for help from @CantStop? I'm telling you I don't want to have to get the Coalition together and you trying my hand looking for the tag in right now? This was between us, yet another snake move :wow: First you called Joel the next Hakeem, now you've turned on him, and when I give you a pass from putting the KillGiL Coalition™ together and you do this? I'm gonna tell you one more time, I have positively affected the bank accounts of coli-posters, and asked for nothing in return from them, don't make me put them with the Rocket fans, Laker fans, Profasi, Bron & Cleveland fans etc to go at you. This is your moment in Coli history, the same point Hitler was at when he decided to invade Russia, you're fighting too many battles on too many fronts, this is the one theater not to enter. I'm warning you because I don't actually want to do it to you, I got leveled up in the last 2 months while you were making new enemies :damn:

Embiid would need to adjust (well, he'd be the one that would need to adjust the most) because like I said above, Boogie's impact is significantly limited if he doesn't have the ball in his hands and isn't getting the majority of possessions.


No he wouldn't :yeshrug:

Just because you said it doesn't mean it would be true, this is all speculation, you can't say anything at all with certainty :manny:


Frequency does matter, I've already acknowledged so in the previous post. Your Buddy/Curry shooting comparison doesn't make sense in this context, and here's why - AD is a greater and more versatile scorer than Embiid is (whereas Buddy's not even in the basketball caste as Curry), therefore he could handle MORE post possessions and not have a notable drop in efficiency in relation to Embiid, because of his abilities. Again, I must reiterate, AD's doesn't get a wealth of post possessions because it's out of necessity for the functionality and success of the team.



Why are you talking about scoring? We were talking strictly about post ups, you brought up AD's post up numbers and directly compared them to Embiid's leaving out the frequency in which they do it, that is exactly the same as posting Hield and Curry's shooting percentages and leaving out attempts. You left out context completely which is why I brought it up, if one guy is doing something 44% of the time, and the other guy is doing it 21% of the time you cannot compare them, but you did anyway :hubie:



Now, who's coming with the "dishonest plays"; assisted shots aren't directly indicative of a player's inability to create for himself, but more so the role one has on the team and the system of play. You're making it seem like he needs his offense fed to him, as if he's incapable of generating it on his own. Players who can put up 30 any given night clearly don't deserve to be squared into that box. Nevermind the fact that he's still progressing and adding to his offensive game.


Post dishonest numbers, then cry foul when others do it, where they do that at breh? Your post up numbers provided absolutely no context and were framed to make it seem like Davis was a comparable post player to the best post player in the NBA. He's not incapable of creating his own offense, but post players generally create their own shots, hence Embiid & LMA being assisted far less than Davis.

Because he's typically been used and accustomed to being a face-up player. I'm not saying that he's going to evolve into a "godly post player" or anything of the sort, partly because it'd go directly against his versatility - he's never going to be just one type of scorer; he'll score in any fashion that the team needs him to.

:ohhh:

He grew up a guard, he has no real desire to play in the post, he's being used the way he's comfortable playing. And Embiid doesn't just score "one way" either :yeshrug:



Weren't you arguing against the notion that one shouldn't try to box players in at a young age? Now here you are saying that an early 20s, all-time talent wasn't ever going to add post-scoring to his game. Sounds like to me @Malta isn't keeping up with his preach and practice.

:wtf:

He's in his 6th season and about to turn 25, he grew up as a guard, he's not developing a post game anytime soon and has never shown the inclination to do so. You reaching like Mo Bamba on this one :smh:



:mjgrin:

If you think Boogie's capable of assuming the roles(s) of AD, well you'd be in for a rude awakening.

:mjgrin:


Ancient Pau and LMA work together without either one of them assuming an "SF" role, if they can do it together then I have no doubt Boogie and Embiid would work as well:mjgrin:


How so, when Cousins is incapable of playing off the ball, and needs touches/heavy TOP to develop rhythm and stay engaged in the game on both ends of the floor (you've seen how often he mentally checks out when things don't go his way, just imagine parlaying that with the line of him not getting the ball when he wanted to; forced to stand out on the perimeter while Embiid is in the post). You think if you took all that away from him and made him have secondary touches to another big man he'd have any great impact on the game? Of course not. His efficency would suffer, his defense and engagement level would suffer even more.

The Sixers play at the 2nd fastest pace in the league, Cousins would still get his 15-18 shots per game, it would just mean less shots for "BobGOTPaid" and less stagnation of their offense. Embiid has a high usage rate because he must have a high usage rate, who else is the offense going to run through, Ben Simmons, Covington?

The 76ers are probably the most hardest-working/hustle team in the league, who don't have an adequate defensive big to replace Embiid when he's off the floor. You replace him with AD and the 76ers would probably be better on defense, you replace AD with Embiid on the Pelicans and they get worse on that end.


So now the Sixers defense would be better with AD in place of Joel? You just said they don't have an adequate defensive big to replace Embiid with, yet they'd be better with Davis, a guy who doesn't like playing C is now going to be a better defensive center than one of the best defensive Cs in the league? :wtf: Beloved, Embiid is an elite defensive anchor, you're not replacing him with Davis and getting the same results, especially not from a guy who doesn't like playing the position.


You wanna know why the Pelicans are 24th in DRTG, it's mostly because of Boogie - AD is the main reason why it's not any worse. The Pelicans are 10 points better on defense when AD is on the floor, that is one of the best marks in the league out of all defensive anchors; the 76ers are only 7 points betters on defense when Embiid is on the floor.

Who the hell is gonna do all the dirty work and run around all over the halfcourt of the defensive end out of Boogie and Embiid?

:mjgrin:

I see you're still not open to the idea of Davis being the number 2 to Embiid, you keep skirting around it :mjgrin:

Also, Embiid plays with two white players in the starting lineup, the fact they are top 5 says enough about how great he is as defensive anchor.


How you gonna call a dude Hakeem, then argue that someone like Davis is better? Is it ochie wally or one mic? Or are you saying Davis is better than Hakeem?:patrice:
 
Top