Breh, there's always a home for you here.
I think this is a reset. And if Rose plays well, then they'll consider keep him. But more likely, it'll be things like "Hey Russell Westbrook, if we did THAT with Rose, imagine what we could do with YOU." Even though, obviously we have no shot at him. I just think THAT'S what's happening here.
This move has a LOT of ass-covering built in:
- If Rose breaks again, the team tanks, and we get a nice lottery pick (and maybe melo has had enough).
- If he plays well, you can use that to attract some free agents, even if you can't get stars, you can get some solid guys that want to come to a competitive nyk teams.
- No matter what, the Knicks are starting this season with a better point guard, probably Melo and KP at their best positions, and there's nothing but flexibility ahead.
Yeah, but who cares. If we're being honest, Rose was a league average pg last season. Middle-10 on the curve. I don't think it's crazy to believe that Grant could be come a league average pg. We're not trading for rose to replace Grant, you're giving up Grant and Lopez to 1) Shed Cap, 2) Grab a Derrick Rose lottery ticket.
It's early, we have to see what they do in the draft and in free agency still -- but right now, they are ATROCIOUS defensively, no matter how you build out the starting 5. a