It is weird that a so called 'black' forum is hating on another black man in leadership, with the only reason given being that he's 'bougee.'
It's always fun to see specific posters try and dismiss issues with Jefferies as non-ideological. It gives a good insight into how the so called "centrists" see the world.
Why would liberal be shook?Hakeem got some Liberals and Republicans shook already. Let's go. You all know seeing a Brother at the top is triggering for this Country. I think Nancy is passing the torch to him because she knows the Generational voting shifts have already happen. 45 and under will dominate the future of the Country and he's young enough to lead the way going forward. Hakeem also don't play and isn't afraid to fight back.
Why would anyone want Biden to bow out?
It’s funny since this forum mostly in TLR but some in here have been running with the narrative that the Democratic Party has been trying to phase out black menIt is weird that a so called 'black' forum is hating on another black man in leadership, with the only reason given being that he's 'bougee.'
I mean this may not mean anything to people domestically but Hakeem is as in the pocket of AIPAC as any Democratic leader that I have seen.
It absolutely means things domestically, because it results in us taking resources we should be using here and shipping it to a Nazi/apartheid country, so they can murder Palestinians.
Also, AIPAC has shifted their money to Republicans and right wing Democrats to stop the tide of progressives who criticize them. It then has ramifications on who we have to vote for policies here. But again, that’s no different than Pelosi.
This just isn't true. We don't have nice things, not because we can't afford them.
I think you misunderstood my message my dude, the "were poor" part was the lie they tell
The opening and closing lines of your rant suggest we are suffering from a scarcity of resources.
Once again and repeat, you clearly misunderstood what I was saying. Please stop trying to start an argument over nothing. Especially since, as a leftist, you know I don't actually believe we suffer from scarcity of resources. If you want to argue, there are plenty of people to do it with.
Then write better. It's a forum nikka.
You've shown yourself to have an extraordinary ability to fukk up and not understand what people are saying in MANY threads. The poster I was speaking to understood what I was saying just fine.Then write better. It's a forum nikka.
They didn't even dap you
The bolded I drew exception to because by and large house members (this thread is about house leadership) have by and large supported an expansion of our social safety net. We've seen them fail in the Senate, but it had nothing to do with AIPAC and entirely because all Republicans voted against it and Manchin and Sinema still believe in the welfare queen.
why wouldnt they is my question. 
