Paramount Erases Archives of MTV Website, Wipes Music, Culture History After 30 Plus Years

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,824
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,352

Paramount Erases Archives of MTV Website, Wipes Music, Culture History After 30 Plus Years​

June 25, 2024 12:36 am

By Roger Friedman

mtv-vma.jpg

Share

https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php...mtv-website-wipes-history-after-20-plus-years

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?te...es-history-after-20-plus-years&via=Showbiz411

https://pinterest.com/pin/create/bu...es+Music,+Culture+History+After+30+Plus+Years

https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=...mtv-website-wipes-history-after-20-plus-years

MTV.com is gone. Kaput. Wiped off the face of the Earth.

Parent company Paramount, formerly Viacom, has tossed twenty plus years of news archives. All that’s left is a placeholder site for reality shows. The M in MTV – music — is gone, and so is all the reporting and all the journalism performed by music and political writers ever written. It’s as if MTV never existed. (It’s the same for VH1.com, all gone.)

There’s no precedent for this, and no valid reason. Just cheapness and stupidity.

This follows the shut down of MTV News on the channel last year. MTV is now just a graveyard for reality show crap. All of its substance has been desiccated over time.

MTV News became a force in music, entertainment, and politics in the early 90s. As the channel’s popularity soared, the News division — including the faces of Kurt Loder, Alison Stewart, Serena Altschul, Sway, and John Norris — became incredibly important especially to political campaigns. Now all those interviews — hundreds of thousands of hours with rock stars and what we now call influencers of generations — have been replaced by a link to “Help! I’m in a Secret Relationship.”

Writer Kathy Iandoli posted: “ MTV.com deleting all of our articles and replacing them with schedules for TV shows that can also no longer be streamed on their site is proof that no one has any idea of what the hell they are doing right now.”

She’s not alone. There is fury among MTV.com writers past and present who now see their histories erased, along with all the music and political reporting.

Patrick Hosken posted: “So, http://mtvnews.com no longer exists. Eight years of my life are gone without a trace. All because it didn’t fit some executives’ bottom lines. Infuriating is too small a word”

Michell Clark wrote: “I don’t even have the words. I was just a freelancer but I put so much blood, sweat, and tears into telling stories that I cared about, the right way, on that platform. What a gut punch.”

The end of the MTV.com archives is not unprecedented. When the former New York Observer was bought by Jared Kushner years ago, hundreds of articles disappeared.

As Paramount destroyed the library of articles, some writers managed to save a few for the WaybackMachine.com, which was just profiled for trying to hold onto evaporating information on the internet. But mostly the articles about pop culture will vanish now.

Paramount owner Shari Redstone has allowed something to happen here much worse than any of her recent fears about selling the company.

The greed of the company is obvious, as well as its lack of respect for journalism. But this is also a wake up call for anyone though the internet was forever. Not having print copies of a writer’s work is a big mistake. A big lesson is learned here.
 

The Devil's Advocate

Call me Dad
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
35,580
Reputation
7,674
Daps
98,669
Reppin
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven
What exactly needed to be preserved? The music and videos still exist. Kurt Loder articles from 1994? Who cares
Yes. Why preserve the news from the time when those things existed? Why keep a record of what happened in music for 30 years when it was at its artistic height?
 

RamsayBolton

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
6,090
Reputation
1,773
Daps
43,693
What exactly needed to be preserved? The music and videos still exist. Kurt Loder articles from 1994? Who cares

Im somewhat neutral on this issue. Made my peace with it once YouTube said they would delete old videos, that's when I realized that this constant holding data for years and years isn't sustainable.

Doesn't make sense to expect companies to spend the money hosting all this data that people only use every now and then on nostalgia trips. And I know damn well some of the people complaining are visiting those sites with ad blockers on anyway.

Theres valid concerns on both sides but we live in a capitalist society so cant expect companies not to look out for their bottom line. If you care about it, you gotta save it. They don't care about the complaints
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,951
Reputation
23,791
Daps
358,636
I hope I'm not overstating it, but I'm not sure if young people today really understand just how big MTV used to be.

If MTV played your video, you had a career.
If they didn't, nobody probably even heard of you.

I probably watched MTV with a decent level of regularity until TRL got popular. I just didn't have the time to watch, nor did I care about VJs like Carson Daly.

It's wild that Viacom would erase that content.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,871
Reputation
9,952
Daps
119,081
Yes. Why preserve the news from the time when those things existed? Why keep a record of what happened in music for 30 years when it was at its artistic height?
People here sprint harder than Usain to excuse corporate greed as if the managers are reading the coli and will hire whomever defends them the hardest.
 
Top