lets see how the rest of the jihad weighs in
yeah whatever, any way stop mentioning whenever some ass backward 3rd world islamic country fukks up. I have nothing to do with them people.
lets see how the rest of the jihad weighs in
That's the strange thing- they clearly accept the scientific understanding of what DNA is on some level, but then refuse to accept its subsequent utility in criminal investigations.
yeah whatever, any way stop mentioning whenever some ass backward 3rd world islamic country fukks up. I have nothing to do with them people.
whatever makes you feel better about yourself
That's the strange thing- they clearly accept the scientific understanding of what DNA is on some level, but then refuse to accept its subsequent utility in criminal investigations.
Elaborating, they said DNA test could prove much helpful in such cases so it should be accepted as secondary evidence.
Members of the council said rape was a crime that required much care in account of evidences and DNA did not stand with accurate parameters as evidence for the crime.
I agree with the council..
DNA is weak evidence for rape...The sex could still be consensual...
But in the case of an under aged person, under the law, then DNA should definitely be used...
I agree with the council..
DNA is weak evidence for rape...The sex could still be consensual...
But in the case of an under aged person, under the law, then DNA should definitely be used...