Oshay Duke Jackson ethers the White Queen of the Manosphere for anti-Black racism!

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,826
Reputation
734
Daps
6,278
This appears to be nothing but a grandiose puff piece promoting his magazine & other endeavors.

I'm also skeptical of Crimson Cure's/Kendra Davis's sentiment regarding Dr. Holman's premier position in the Black Manosphere considering theirs is very little information regarding him (past/present) plus she's also directly involved with Dr. Holman via his magazine.
The biggest problem always has been that these people’s background and history is unknown.

Of course you can do some digging, but they themselves try to hide it as much as possible.
 

WheresWallace

Superstar
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
11,967
Reputation
6,065
Daps
42,665
Reppin
NULL
Welp...The Lead Attorney has officially thrown JPT and Destiny under the bus.

:mjlol:



Both them niiggas is clowns. :mjpls:
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
47,046
Reputation
20,104
Daps
188,625
Welp...The Lead Attorney has officially thrown JPT and Destiny under the bus.

:mjlol:

He's been hated Destiny since their debate. Destiny just hit him with stats and he fell all apart.

He keeps telling BM not to fight for their children and Destiny pulled up the data that said that when men actually fight for their children they win the majority of time.

Lead start Juelzing and has been tight with dude ever since.

I hope you guys don't think that a former lawyer is above the grift.
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
47,046
Reputation
20,104
Daps
188,625
How would you structure a community / society to solve the problems Black America is facing? In particularly the issues between BM-BW relationships? There is unruly women doing the most asinine things in public. Not all, but they are out there… twerking in public spaces etc… making a complete fool out of BW.

I did research in the to root of the problem and I did post it in this thread, and started with the "GI Bill" and "The Man in the House Rule". That's when the Black marriage rate started to decline.

I admit that a large part of the Red Pill (supposed Black manosphere) guys aren't aware of the root cause and are making the argument that it's a "Western problem". That's the argument I have heard them say constantly.
The "man in the house rule" only lasted for 4 years and was only in 12 states. And the rule assumed that a man being in a home meant he was providing.

It was over turned with the help of a BW because the government didn’t think a man who was not the farther of the children should be responsible for caring for them.

Public assistance was in response to the lack of provision including the 'poor man's divorce' where men would just leave instead of actually getting a divorce. Public assistance was a response to lack of provision not the cause of it.

I don't understand how something that lasted such a small amount of time in a very limited amount of places is still being used as an excuse. It's silly as hell.

The rule has not applied in decades yet the problem is worse now than it ever was then.
 

WheresWallace

Superstar
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
11,967
Reputation
6,065
Daps
42,665
Reppin
NULL
I still cant believe bp allowed this bytch to referee 'our' gender war, idgaf WHO she spoke to when he was living.

MTR seemed like he was forced to confront the fact of the matter. I understand being young or whatever, but... lemme just say, I'm not confident he'll catch on early next time. Or any of the other black manosphere guys. Going back to the old forum days, the manosphere has always been a deeply anti black space.

Crimson, ofc, called it ages ago, but she's framed as an unattractive hater, and bw be the worst.

MTR is in his late 30s. I think he’s 38 or 39. When I was a pre teen in middle school I used to call out b.s. when I saw it. I was too young to know how to define it but I definitely was smart enough to spot it.

No excuses for non of these red pills or divestors.
 

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,298
Reputation
2,237
Daps
22,280
Reppin
Los Angeles
He's been hated Destiny since their debate. Destiny just hit him with stats and he fell all apart.

He keeps telling BM not to fight for their children and Destiny pulled up the data that said that when men actually fight for their children they win the majority of time.

Lead start Juelzing and has been tight with dude ever since.

I hope you guys don't think that a former lawyer is above the grift.
Destiny is a suspected white supremacist grifter like Pearl. He plays the other side of fence in the Black Gender Wars, You also have a gay grifter in Themis and Thots. All three are non Black heterosexual people speaking on Black Heterosexual relationships. It’s so :demonic: , friend.
 
Last edited:

Rakim Allah

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
13,298
Reputation
2,237
Daps
22,280
Reppin
Los Angeles
The "man in the house rule" only lasted for 4 years and was only in 12 states. And the rule assumed that a man being in a home meant he was providing.

It was over turned with the help of a BW because the government didn’t think a man who was not the farther of the children should be responsible for caring for them.

Public assistance was in response to the lack of provision including the 'poor man's divorce' where men would just leave instead of actually getting a divorce. Public assistance was a response to lack of provision not the cause of it.

I don't understand how something that lasted such a small amount of time in a very limited amount of places is still being used as an excuse. It's silly as hell.

The rule has not applied in decades yet the problem is worse now than it ever was then.
It all starts with protecting your womb. Your body your choice. Take accountability before you have to deal with the consequences, friend.
 

jay83

Superstar
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
6,473
Reputation
1,620
Daps
44,654
I agree

The first mistake the black manosphere made was giving a platform to a bytch who doesn’t even look like us nor share our struggles. This bytch is a definition of imposter syndrome.

It’s even laughable that she’s called the “Female Kevin Samuels” Kevin Samuels fathered most of these insurgents. Kevin stood out because he was actually promoting black marriages, encouraging black men and black women to enhance themselves and stable relationships.

Despite his harsh tone, Kevin’s passion uncovered that he actually gave a fukk about the black community prospering. Like a no nonsense father figure.

The black manosphere is in a confused state. Parroting points that divides the gap of black folks instead of closing the gap. The constant shytting on black women is a manifestation of hurt and hatred energy. Hurt people hurt people. We need to take an inside scope on the root causes in able to make rational solutions. If we don’t we remain stuck to where we are.


To be honest the manosphere was supposed to be men only. Even women with good intentions can still bring fukkery. But they let not only a woman but a clueless entitled white woman as the main face. Lol. The minute they monetized YouTube this was bound to happen.

Everything that can be exploited will be. Most YouTubers are shameless anyway so the only way the manosphere would actually work if it is offline with black working men only. Everything else will eventually lead to what we are experiencing.
 

saturn7

Politics is an EXCHANGE!!!
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
12,012
Reputation
2,710
Daps
58,515
Reppin
DMV Freedman
Destiny is a suspected white supremacist grifter like Pearl. He plays the other side of fence in the Black Gender Wars, You also have a gay grifter in Themis and Thots. All three are non Black heterosexual people speaking on Black Heterosexual relationships. It’s so :demonic: , friend.

I heard Destiny say he gets talking points to use against RP Black men from Divestors.

Which makes sense because they all hate non-p*ssy pandering heterosexual Black men.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,826
Reputation
734
Daps
6,278
The "man in the house rule" only lasted for 4 years and was only in 12 states. And the rule assumed that a man being in a home meant he was providing.

It was over turned with the help of a BW because the government didn’t think a man who was not the farther of the children should be responsible for caring for them.

Public assistance was in response to the lack of provision including the 'poor man's divorce' where men would just leave instead of actually getting a divorce. Public assistance was a response to lack of provision not the cause of it.

I don't understand how something that lasted such a small amount of time in a very limited amount of places is still being used as an excuse. It's silly as hell.

The rule has not applied in decades yet the problem is worse now than it ever was then.
The Man In The House Rule should be put in contrast to the GI Bill, and decrease of Black marriage rates. The damage was done and impactful enough.

"Black veterans in search of the education they had been guaranteed fared no better. Many Black men returning home from the war didn’t even try to take advantage of the bill’s educational benefits—they could not afford to spend time in school instead of working. But those who did were at a considerable disadvantage compared to their white counterparts. Public education provided poor preparation for Black students, and many lacked much educational attainment at all due to poverty and social pressures."
[...]
"The postwar housing boom almost entirely excluded Black Americans, most of whom remained in cities that received less and less investment from businesses and banks."
[...]
"Though the GI Bill guaranteed low-interest mortgages and other loans, they were not administered by the VA itself. Thus, the VA could cosign, but not actually guarantee the loans. This gave white-run financial institutions free rein to refuse mortgages and loans to Black people."
[...]
"As veteran applications flooded universities, Black students often found themselves left out. Northern universities dragged their feet when it came to admitting Black students, and Southern colleges barred Black students entirely. And the VA itself encouraged Black veterans to apply for vocational training instead of university admission and arbitrarily denied educational benefits to some students."


"One of the most important social changes unfolding in the United States over the past half century has been the decline of the institution of marriage – a decline especially steep among blacks. In 1960, roughly 74% of whites were married, and the rate dropped to 56% in 2008. That is a big drop, but not compared to the plummeting marriage rate for blacks. In 1960, 61% of blacks were married in 1960, but by 2008 it was only 32%. Blacks also get divorced more often and remarry less frequently than whites."

"Public rhetoric often decries a societal retreat from marriage – that it is an increasingly obsolete institution (Time Magazine/Pew Research Center 2010). The 1950s have been described as the “golden age” of marriage in the United States and marriage has declined since the 1960s (c00ntz 2000/1992; Cherlin 2009/2004). In this paper, we take a longer view of the history of marriage by xes and race, describing trends among those never married at age 35 and age 45 and older, and historical median ages at first marriage using Decennial Census data. We find that the 1950s and 1960s were an anomaly for men and women given the high proportions married at young ages.
Race differences are particularly interesting, as black women were more often married than white women prior to World War II, yet since the 1980s, have been increasingly less likely to be married."
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2012/demo/SEHSD-WP2012-12.pdf

"Kelly Raley, Megan Sweeney, and Danielle Wondra begin by reviewing common explanations for these differences, which first gained momentum in the 1960s (though patterns of marital instability diverged earlier than patterns of marriage formation). Structural factors—for example, declining employment prospects and rising incarceration rates for unskilled black men—clearly play a role, the authors write, but such factors don’t fully explain the divergence in marriage patterns. In particular, they don’t tell us why we see racial and ethnic differences in marriage across all levels of education, and not just among the unskilled."

"Between 1960 and 1985, female-headed families grew from 20.6 to 43.7 percent of all black families, compared to growth from 8.4 to 12 percent for white families.' Recent estimates suggest that more than half of all black families are headed by women."
[...]
Figure 1. The data show, contrary to widely held beliefs, that through 1960, rates of marriage for both black and white women were lowest at the end of the 1800s and peaked in 1950 for blacks and 1960 for whites. Furthermore it is dramatically clear that black females married at higher rates than white females of native parentage until 1950.
[...]
What the Moynihan Report did not show in highlighting the increase in the number of black female-headed families between 1950 and 1960 was that the proportion of black women who were ever married in 1960 stood at its second highest level since 1890,and it was considerably higher in 1960 than it had been in 1940 (Figure 1). The proportion of black female-headed families was also lower in 1960 than in 1940, and the proportion of urban black female-headed families in 1960 was lower than it had been in both 1930 and1940.

Although the increase in the proportion of black female-headed families between 1950 and 1960 contrasts with the decline in the proportion of white female-headed families between 1950and 1960, after 1960 there was a rise in female-headed white families (see Table 2). Moreover, as Andrew Cherlin has pointed out, it is hazardous to draw inferences from the conditions of American families in the 1950s, because the 1950s were probably the most unusual decade for family life in this century."


This is the original source:

POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES
Trends and Prospects: 1950—1990

https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/1974/demographics/p23-049.pdf

Source, by Douglas J. Besharov and Andrew West, right ?

https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817998721_95.pdf

Welfare Reform Academy - Family Policy, Marriage, and Divorce Publications
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,826
Reputation
734
Daps
6,278
SWP is hilarious. He’s never monetized his YouTube page so whether you agree or disagree with any of his statements you know he’s not grifting, friend.

Yeah, I listened. I recall that I did hear him speak a few years ago, he's from a middle class Black family. He had some good points.
 
Last edited:

⠀X ⠀

Geoff
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
17,867
Reputation
5,616
Daps
102,794
Damn, even TLA is live now, defending her and coōning it up. Very disappointing.



And Jason is already gearing up

 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,826
Reputation
734
Daps
6,278
Damn, even TLA is live now, defending her and coōning it up. Very disappointing.



And Jason is already gearing up

In one way it’s disappointing and in another way it’s good this is happening.

The weeding out process has started. During the ‘60s these c00ns would have been informants for you known who…
 
Top