Oppenheimer (Directed by Christopher nolan)

daemonova

hit it, & I didn't go Erykah Badu crazy, #yallmad
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
46,961
Reputation
4,180
Daps
76,691
GS7105TW0AE6L4t
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
60,660
Reputation
5,890
Daps
142,738
This might be Nolans most overrated film by far. I have no desire to ever watch this movie again.
I just watched it for the first time last night. The 3 hour run time kept me at bay for a while.

I'm a big Nolan fan and I agree, this film didn't move me like some of his others. It's better than Tenet tho
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
38,553
Reputation
5,912
Daps
125,579
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
I just watched it for the first time last night. The 3 hour run time kept me at bay for a while.

I'm a big Nolan fan and I agree, this film didn't move me like some of his others. It's better than Tenet tho
Cillian killed his role no doubt. He deserved best actor. But the movie itself just did absolutely nothing for me. At least Tenet tried to be original. It makes my brain hurt but made me think more than Oppenheimer tbh
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
60,660
Reputation
5,890
Daps
142,738
Cillian killed his role no doubt. He deserved best actor. But the movie itself just did absolutely nothing for me. At least Tenet tried to be original. It makes my brain hurt but made me think more than Oppenheimer tbh
I appreciate the story being told because I haven't looked into it previously too much.

The acting was great, the dialog and audio quality overall was world's better than some of his other films where you need subtitles on.

This story felt challenging to convey tension leading up to the climax. Laying out theory and the political ideologies that were prevalent at the time isn't exactly exciting theater. They tried adding the random molecular visual scenes with the intense sound effects and the B&W scenes to break up the present vs the past storytelling... Did any of this make the eventual reveal pay off more in the end? Not really.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
38,553
Reputation
5,912
Daps
125,579
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
I appreciate the story being told because I haven't looked into it previously too much.

The acting was great, the dialog and audio quality overall was world's better than some of his other films where you need subtitles on.

This story felt challenging to convey tension leading up to the climax. Laying out theory and the political ideologies that were prevalent at the time isn't exactly exciting theater. They tried adding the random molecular visual scenes with the intense sound effects and the B&W scenes to break up the present vs the past storytelling... Did any of this make the eventual reveal pay off more in the end? Not really.
It should have been a riveting type film and I'm a sucker for historical dramas especially surrounding war time situations but this flick just didn't have that. Nolan has a problem with just letting a movie flow sometimes.
 

Rick Fox at UNC

All Star
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
4,903
Reputation
1,141
Daps
11,472
Reppin
Pretty Boys
It should have been a riveting type film and I'm a sucker for historical dramas especially surrounding war time situations but this flick just didn't have that. Nolan has a problem with just letting a movie flow sometimes.

Was about as "riveting" a movie as you can have about a subject filled with technical arcana. He managed to make an interesting biopic that is set around multiple opaque and highly technical institutions: the U.S. Intelligence apparatus, physics departments, etc. He also managed to present those worlds and the people in them realistically, without all of the boring shadowy/mystery tropes normally used. He presented the individuals as petty, lustful, jealous, of dubious morality at times, insular, etc. All realistic.

He used music as a device to underscore the weight and time sensitivity of what was happening during that period, while still keeping the action confined to their small little world of New Mexico and university physics departments--something he is really good at. He captured well, the sense of those guys being in the own little world, as scientist/engineers often are.

He wasn't making a WWII epic.

Films like the Imitation Game didn't even come close while stuff like Good Shepherd tried to out clever itself a bit too much.

If you're comparing this to Melville's Army of Shadows, or like Bertolucci's Conformist, or that period of filmmaking. Or a PBS Frontline documentary, yea, it is lacking in substance.

But not sure what contemporary Hollywood film does it better.
 
Last edited:

Rick Fox at UNC

All Star
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
4,903
Reputation
1,141
Daps
11,472
Reppin
Pretty Boys
Finally saw this, pretty good :ehh: KInda made me feel like I played myself not going to the IMAX show ...At least I got to see heel Godzilla on the big screen zooted on edibles

Cast was insane too

Definitely. Saw it 3 or 4 times in IMAX, worth it.

Watched Tenet a few times in IMAX as well, upset I missed out on Dunkirk and his earlier movies.
 
Top