Interesting. What makes Sacramento a viable place to live?
If I'm coming from Los Angeles, it's still in California, and to many Californians that matters...
The Black California diaspora stretches across the entire nation, of course with many Black Californians choosing to go back south, or next door to Nevada or Arizona. Most Black Californians are ancestrally tied to the South Central states (west of the Mississippi River: Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma), but I've met us everywhere, there's plenty of us in Georgia, Tennessee, and the Carolinas. Some of my own Angeleno family returned to Arkansas in the early 10s...
But I live in the South, and like many other Californians, if all things were equal, I'd choose California. Some Californians want an entire change of scenery, but there are those of us who'd rather remain close to the culture and weather and people we grew up with...
Also, for California, Sacramento is cheap (getting more expensive, but cheaper than the coast). Black America is still the most disenfranchised group in the US, the wages and ability to acquire assets lags behind everyone else. So affordability matters to us way more than anyone else, and Sacramento is one of the few bastions of affordability...
Lastly, Sac is in its "black golden era", since the mid-10s. There's always been black people in Sac, my mom's family has been here since '72 and my dad's paternal side has been here since before then, maybe 10 years earlier. But historically the migration of black folk to California concentrated heavily on the coastal cities; Sacramento has historically been a very white city...
Sac has never had the number of black businesses and black-themed cultural events that it has now, and its beautiful watching it develop. Its the complete opposite of the coastal cities who were at their peaks of black culture in eras past, and I think it's exciting to live somewhere like this. It's like being black in SF in the 40s thru 60s, or black in Oakland in the 60s thru 80s...
I'd much rather live in Sac than anywhere in Nevada or AZ, and its a more attractive place than most of the rest of the country too...
nikkas got called all kinds of names for saying this about LA
Because people act like this isn't happening elsewhere. And its happening worse almost everywhere else, the black decline in LA is near bottoming out. The Bay cities and SD are all losing black people more rapidly--->and the northern cities across the East Coast and Midwest are almost all losing black citizens, and almost all losing them faster than LA is...
The problem was portraying the decline of black population as an LA-centered issue on a site that allegedly cares about Black Community in general. New York, Chicago, and many other cities are in far worse shape currently re: declining black community...
If Sacramento wasn’t the capital of California, it be another inland California city like Bakersfield and Stockton
Well, Sac has been the capital since 1854 and before that was the first incorporated city in Cali. You could say this about anywhere, Hollywood didn't take off until the 1910s, what would LA be without it? LA had gained over a million residents in less than 3 decades, had 102,000 in 1900 and over 1.2 million in 1930, on the back of Hollywood's explosion...
Would LA be Riverside or Dino without Hollywood? We could do this with anywhere...