One of the Greatest Proofs That Evolution is a Bold Faced Occultist Lie

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

call other mens bodies works of art

confuse praise of the people of the sun with homocacness brehs.

 

[xCivicx]

No

Ok so according to heliocentric theory, even though our clocks operate on a full 24 hour time scale, the earth supposedly makes 1 full rotation every 23 hours and 56 minutes, not every 24 hours

Thats what a sidereal day is, a 23:56 hour full rotation instead of a 24:00 hour full rotation

So using some simple math, we can map out the sun's position in the sky at any given point in time

Example: you walk outside on december 1 to watch the sun set at 7:00 oclock on the dot.

According to the idea of a "sidereal day", the earth will make another full rotation in 23:56, not 24:00, which is what our clocks go to

So you go outside on december 2 at 7pm to see the sun set, but it should have set 4 minutes before that, at 6:56 since the earth supposedly makes 1 full rotation every 23:56

Then on december 3, the sun should be setting 4 minutes before that, at 6:52

Each day after that, the sun SHOULD be setting 4 minutes earlier than the previous day, according to heliocentric theory

Mathing that out over the course of 1 month, 30 days multiplied by 4 minutes a day is 120

There should be a 120 minute difference between the time that the sun sets on December 1 and the time that the sun sets on december 30, meaning a 7pm sunset on the 1st SHOULD become a 5pm sunset at the end of that month, then a 3pm sunset at the end of january, then a 1 pm sunset at the end of feburary, then an 11am sunset at the end of february and so on

Literally NONE OF US observe this and no human ever has. The sun sets with regularity all year, at around the same time(give or take daylight savings time)

The logical conclusion drawn from this, is that the earth is stationary and the sun circles above us in the sky with extremely accurate regularity, which completely disproves heliocentric theory

And if the sun rotates above us so perfectly, that means its aimed at us, which means something/someone aimed it at us

I hope that makes sense

 

[semicko82]

Ok so according to heliocentric theory, even though our clocks operate on a full 24 hour time scale, the earth supposedly makes 1 full rotation every 23 hours and 56 minutes, not every 24 hours

Thats what a sidereal day is, a 23:56 hour full rotation instead of a 24:00 hour full rotation

So using some simple math, we can map out the sun's position in the sky at any given point in time

Example: you walk outside on december 1 to watch the sun set at 7:00 oclock on the dot.

According to the idea of a "sidereal day", the earth will make another full rotation in 23:56, not 24:00, which is what our clocks go to

So you go outside on december 2 at 7pm to see the sun set, but it should have set 4 minutes before that, at 6:56 since the earth supposedly makes 1 full rotation every 23:56

Then on december 3, the sun should be setting 4 minutes before that, at 6:52

Each day after that, the sun SHOULD be setting 4 minutes earlier than the previous day, according to heliocentric theory

Mathing that out over the course of 1 month, 30 days multiplied by 4 minutes a day is 120

There should be a 120 minute difference between the time that the sun sets on December 1 and the time that the sun sets on december 30, meaning a 7pm sunset on the 1st SHOULD become a 5pm sunset at the end of that month, then a 3pm sunset at the end of january, then a 1 pm sunset at the end of feburary, then an 11am sunset at the end of february and so on

Literally NONE OF US observe this and no human ever has. The sun sets with regularity all year, at around the same time(give or take daylight savings time)

The logical conclusion drawn from this, is that the earth is stationary and the sun circles above us in the sky with extremely accurate regularity, which completely disproves heliocentric theory

And if the sun rotates above us so perfectly, that means its aimed at us, which means something/someone aimed it at us

I hope that makes sense

It makes sense, but is that your only proof for intelligent design

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

It makes sense, but is that your only proof for intelligent design

The Sun doesn't rotate above us, breh. The Earth spins on it's axis and the reason it shines on us is because it's freakin' incomprehensibly humongous and shines on everything.

But, you already know this.

You're wasting time entering into a conversation with that dude. He's a dishonest, lying, illogical, scientifically/mathematically illiterate Flat Earther who has NO idea what he's talking about and is just regurgitating arguments/talking-points he's heard on youtube. He doesn't have an original argument to support ANYTHING he's stated in this thread whatsoever.​

 

[semicko82]

The Sun doesn't rotate above us, breh. The Earth spins on it's axis and the reason it shines on us is because it's freakin' incomprehensibly humongous and shines on everything.

But, you already know this.

You're wasting time entering into a conversation with that dude. He's a dishonest, lying, illogical, scientifically/mathematically illiterate Flat Earther who has NO idea what he's talking about and is just regurgitating arguments/talking-points he's heard on youtube. He doesn't have an original argument to support ANYTHING he's stated in this thread whatsoever.​

I get that, but that doesn't proof there was a definite intelligent design

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I get that, but that doesn't proof there was a definite intelligent design

You can't DISPROVE ID, but you can't PROVE it, either.

Their argument is basically an argument from incredulity, 'I don't know how that happened, therefore, a Designer did it.'

Questioning a theory does NOTHING to disprove it.....and I mean 'theory' in the scientific understanding of the term, not the colloquial.​

 

[semicko82]

You can't DISPROVE ID, but you can't PROVE it, either.

Their argument is basically an argument from incredulity, 'I don't know how that happened, therefore, a Designer did it.'

Questioning a theory does NOTHING to disprove it.....and I mean 'theory' in the scientific understanding of the term, not the colloquial.​

Exactly, but those same people will be quick to throw evolution in the bushes

 

[Take It In Blood]

i see u miring

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Exactly, but those same people will be quick to throw evolution in the bushes

It's just a few who happen to be making the most noise.

The vast majority of theists have NO problem with evolutionary theory.

Matter of fact, it isn't just theists who take issue with the current theory, but other evolutionary biologists and mathematicians.​

 

[xCivicx]

It makes sense, but is that your only proof for intelligent design

Nah i have a ton

A couple more involve the sun

A couple involve the coriolis effect

A couple involve ancient civilizations

 

[xCivicx]

Exactly, but those same people will be quick to throw evolution in the bushes

I have whoever youre responding on ignore, but it really baffles me how hard yall cling to evolutionary theory because its pseudoscience and its directly disrespectful to you and all your ancestors if youre black

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

It's funny when people who don't understand science try to criticize it.

'It's just a theory. It's never been observed. Mathematical formulas don't reflect reality.'

Yeah, okay.

​

 

[semicko82]

I have whoever youre responding on ignore, but it really baffles me how hard yall cling to evolutionary theory because its pseudoscience and its directly disrespectful to you and all your ancestors if youre black

You see signs of evolution everywhere

 

[xCivicx]

You see signs of evolution everywhere

You actually dont

You just dont know the difference between adaptation and evolution

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The dude says 'You don't know the difference between adaptation and evolution', yet can't see the difference between the Flat Earth model, and the Globe Earth model.

One works, flawlessly, the other doesn't exist.

Take advice from scientifically illiterate, dishonest, lying, 'special snowflakes', brehs.

​