It wasn't 6 figures though. That's an absolute, obvious lie. Why would someone be asked to pay 6 figures on a patent that had already been rejected anyway? The patent office wouldn't even be asking for maintenance fees for a patent that had never been accepted, the most he'd pay is application fees which are minimal.
lol, he had just made $4.5 million for doing
Ironman in 2008. He also starred in
Fighting in 2009, voiced James in
The Princess and the Frog in 2009, starred in
Law & Order: Los Angeles in 2010, and starred in both
The Ledge and
Winnie Mandela in 2011. And that's after having gotten mad work in 2005-2007 (
Crash,
Ray,
Hustle & Flow,
Four Brothers,
Animal,
Get Rich or Die Tryin',
Idlewild,
Pride,
The Hunting Party,
The Brave One,
August Rush,
Awake, The Perfect Holiday)
Claiming that Terrence Howard couldn't afford the same patent fees that no-name tinkerers pay every day might be worse than 1x1=2.
Are you claiming he avoided paying a patent for "$7 trillion technology" because he was too busy paying for patents on little pieces of plastic glued together?
But the patent ISN'T complex. It's simple as fukk. There is no technology or complex anything anywhere in here. It's just generic nothing.
A method and system for capturing user actions in the real world and mapping the users, their actions, and their avatars into a three dimensional virtual environment. Data representing real world users are captured, collected and sent to a virtual proxy bridge, which transforms the data into...
patents.google.com
Please, quote the complex part for me. What's the most complicated technological innovation in this whole patent?