On social media, they saying that Terrance Howard really is smart and they tryna give him credit for AR/VR technology. EDIT debunked

Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
71,910
Reputation
17,058
Daps
305,945
:mjtf:

After a chic said this, I told her she was crazy and then she came back with receipts. :mindblown:

I'm too busy right now to really look at this but I did a cursory glance and I'm like :wtf:

Here's the link to the patent: US20100271394A1 - System and method for merging virtual reality and reality to provide an enhanced sensory experience - Google Patents

She's telling me to look at the companies that cited it, and she told me that it's proof that a lot of major companies used Terrence Howard's invention. I see Microsoft, Amazon, Hewlett Packard and a bunch of other companies that cited his invention :wtf:

I ain't gon lie, I'm getting cooked right now! Cause I don't have an answer for this :what:

Can brehs who know about inventions explain to me what the hell is going on?? :dahell:



KDMX7Ee.png







khvAbHP.png
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,495
Reputation
8,356
Daps
99,240
Why not just issue an apology like your boy Diddy did:francis:


Just tell her you werent aware of the vast knowledge a black man can recieve from the light codes. But youll never make that mistake again:respect:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
Nah I need more proof first :ufdup:


Lemme tag a scientist. @Professor Emeritus



There was already a thread and a Coli poster who can read patents debunked it.


1) The application is just a generic description of VR with no special technology or anything.

2) The patent office immediately flagged the patent as derivative with all claims already contained in other people's previous patents.

3) Howard never responded to their rejection notice, so the application was flagged as abandoned.




He has like 97 patent applications (including crazy shyt, like he tried to patent "diamond jewelry"), and all of the applications were rejected/abandoned except for a few "design patents" for shapes he made by gluing pieces of plastic together that don't do anything.
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
72,436
Reputation
15,098
Daps
279,054
Reppin
The Truth
Damn you late af

There’s a whole thread on it. But everyone late, most didnt know anything about his shyt until Joe Rogan had him going viral..

And he has more patents than that I believe

Edit: I counted at least 20

They're under his middle name which is what I said earlier in the other thread. People keep trying to discredit dude, but he’s been popping in the psuedo-science arena for a min.
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
71,910
Reputation
17,058
Daps
305,945
There was already a thread and a Coli poster who can read patents debunked it.


1) The application is just a generic description of VR with no special technology or anything.

2) The patent office immediately flagged the patent as derivative with all claims already contained in other people's previous patents.

3) Howard never responded to their rejection notice, so the application was flagged as abandoned.




He has like 97 patent applications (including crazy shyt, like he tried to patent "diamond jewelry"), and all of the applications were rejected/abandoned except for a few "design patents" for shapes he made by gluing pieces of plastic together that don't do anything.






Thanks breh. When I get back online tonight, imma end ole girl whole career :wow:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
Here's the breh:


Nah, his idea was rejected. A non-final rejection was sent out on 10/10/2012 explaining that his invention was not novel, it was anticipated by an invention by Basso et al. (US PG Pub 2010/0157063 if you want to look it up). Anticipation means every aspect of what he was claiming as his invention was publicly disclosed by another inventor already. After the non-final rejection was sent out, Terrence and his lawyers failed to respond and the application went abandoned. That's it. That's what happened. It has nothing to do with lawyers hitting him up for money, or it shouldn't at least, considering that he's quite wealthy and the fees at the early stage he was in couldn't have amounted to much. Everyday regular joe's file for patents all the time, Terrence Howard definitely could've handled the early legal fees. His patent application going abandoned has everything to do with the fact that he didn't invent or disclose anything novel.

:unimpressed: Wrong. It absolutely was rejected. See above.

Not trying to be funny or sarcastic or rude, but I promise you that I more than likely know much more than you do about the patent process. Trust me. With that said, it's not about money. His patent was rejected initially because the invention was not considered to be novel (the patent examiner on his case found another patent publication that disclosed everything he was claiming as his new invention) and when he and his lawyers failed to respond to the rejection, the case then went abandoned. End of story.

With all due respect, I think some of y'all are kinda getting caught up listening to a guy who's talking a lot but not saying anything. This whole patent thing kind of exemplifies that he's saying and doing things that may seem like they're legit, but when you actually dig into the details, the reality just doesn't match up. Just my two cents. This will more than likely be my last time responding to anything regarding this situation but I just wanted to provide a little factual information for folks to digest.



Here are the receipts. The patent application is here:


Application US12/765,485 events

2010-04-22 Application filed by Individual
2010-04-22 Priority to US12/765,485
2010-10-28 Publication of US20100271394A1
Status Abandoned


Legal Events​


2013-05-06 Information on status: application discontinuation Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION



You can see the application was discontinued and marked "abandoned" without any legal status ever being granted. You can also read the patent yourself and see there's no technological breakthroughs or even anything interesting described in the patent, he's literally just saying shyt like, "So you set up some cameras in one room, and then set up some other cameras to capture motion in another room..." as if people didn't have those basic-ass ideas about VR already figured out in 2010.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
And he has more patents than that I believe

Edit: I counted at least 20

They're under his middle name which is what I said earlier in the other thread. People keep trying to discredit dude, but he’s been popping in the sue-do-science arena for a min.


Yes, he has many patent applications. Not actual patents, just failed applications. They're for crazy shyt, like trying to patent diamond jewelry. No, not some particular special form of diamond jewelry.....he tried to patent the very idea of diamond jewelry.



Diamond jewelry

Abstract

A diamond band made from solid diamond can be worn on a body part. Various pieces of jewelry are made from a diamond such as a plate of chemical vapor deposition formed diamond.

Description​

  • FIELD [0001]
    The present invention relates to the jewelry art, and specifically to jewelry made from a diamond.
  • BACKGROUND
    Diamonds have long been viewed as the symbol of eternal love and therefore associated with marriage through the use of diamond engagement rings and wedding rings.
  • [0003]
    The prior art is replete with jewelry that includes diamonds, such as wedding bands, engagement rings, and earrings. The settings to hold diamonds in place are widely varied. For example, it is known in the art to make a ring or band to encircle a finger from precious metals. A setting may be included at some point or points, on or embedded in the band. Precious stones, such as diamonds may be held in place by the settings.

Images (4)

US20110072851A1-20110331-D00000.png
US20110072851A1-20110331-D00001.png
US20110072851A1-20110331-D00002.png
US20110072851A1-20110331-D00003.png

Classifications

A44C27/001 Materials for manufacturing jewellery
View 5 more classifications

US20110072851A1

Inventor Terrence Dashon Howard Michael R. Monahan


Application US12/567,400 events

2009-09-25 Application filed by Individual
2009-09-25 Priority to US12/567,400
2011-03-31 Publication of US20110072851A1

Status Abandoned

 
Top