TCL is a solid brand. Fully vertically intergraded. QLED also isn't bad. At least you don't have to worry about burn in or your OLED randomly developing dead pixels later in life (something I've had happen on my LG C7) on a QLED TV. I remember when I had the original QLED TV the Sony W900A, I miss that TV.TLC QLED?
TCL is a top TV brand.
yall talking about this shyt like it's an RCA or a Westinghouse. This is an 8/10 level brand TV on their flagship model. It's not a bad TV.
Pure bang for your buck TCL is elite in the LED space...the reviews speak for themselves.
Maganvox is big in the VCR space
Yeah there's nothing wrong with a TCL QLED. A 65 inch QM8 is like $900 (normal price) and that's their flagship. The LG G4 flagship in 65 inches cost 2.7x the price (on sale) at $2400 and isn't rated dramatically better.Pure bang for your buck TCL is elite in the LED space...the reviews speak for themselves.
This ain't an LED/LCD thread though...
If you can't tell the difference between any OLED and a TCL:
Do it bro. If you have the money for a G4 I’d consider that but you will love the TV whichever one you get
OLED TVs have conditions they do better in and QDLED TVs also have conditions they do better in. On brightness in general, HDR, and in a well lit room an OLED is getting smoked by a QD-LED set. On black levels and in a dim lit room an OLED is better.If you can't tell the difference between any OLED and a TCL:
Ain't no .5 point difference
- Your vision sucks
- The setup is faulty
- Both
LEDs might do alright in a bright room, but in no way, shape or form is an LED of any type "smoking" an OLED. Sounds like you ODed on copium.
You honestly think OLEDs can get as bright as an LED set? It's on thing to have tech you prefer but it's another to gloss over the inherent flaws of that tech to try and make it sound better. There isn't a flawless commercial TV tech right now. Whatever you pick there's trade offs.