She could come back with more goons and a heavy weapon.
Most criminals don't give a fukk....and so should you.
Answer the question
She could come back with more goons and a heavy weapon.
Most criminals don't give a fukk....and so should you.
We're not absolving her! The fact is HE isn't her judge, jury and executioner. Once someone leaves your house, and is trying to flee, you aren't given free reign to chase them down and shoot them in the back. She had already surrendered, and he made a choice to kill that woman. His life was in no way threatened so he wasn't justified in taking hers and maybe (if we believe this dumb bytch) the life of her unborn child.
latasha? thought the store owner was wrong?There was a big case in California of a little girl getting killed by a Korean store owner. Store owner thought she was stealing and shot her in the head while she was trying to leave. Same concept. Y'all support that too?
Exactly. People are just so emotionally overcome with their hate of stealing that they can't look at this sensibly. The girl could have gotten away and dude could have seen her years later and shot her in the back in public and cats would still defend it like "she shouldn't have broke into his house."
She could come back with more goons and a heavy weapon.
Most criminals don't give a fukk....and so should you.
I'm pretty sure warning shots aren't legalHow you gonna do a home invasion and not have a tooly on you, you asking for something bad to happen with ya plans. Clint eastwood aint have to shoot and kill shorty tho if she was of no threat anymore, should be some ramifications. Should have fired a warning shot and held her at gun point while he called the cops.