Ok wait.. I haven't been paying much attention.. Brock's holding the title until next Wrestlemania?

[mrken12]

He doesn't because he doesn't have to breh...
And he's STILL over as fukk..
How can you hate on that?...
But I'll give you that though...
I wish he would put more effort in my damn self...

There you go. And I mentioned that Lashley was in almost the same role and was way more entertaining in TNA. I'm sure that Lashley could probably give a half ass effort like Brock without consequences but he'd rather give the fans great matches.

 

[cartierhoe]

If you want to see how to book a "legit" guy as dominant but still has great matches look at Lashley's recent TNA World Title runs.

Brock had great matches when he first came back

 

[mrken12]

Brock had great matches when he first came back

His last decent one on one match was in 2014.

 

[cartierhoe]

His last decent one on one match was in 2014.

I mean I guess and yeah I wish Brock was motivated just a little more than he usually is, but like bro said he's one of the few guys who is REALLY over. If you can work less but still be over just as much that is a luxury, and is that not what wrestling is at the end of the day

 

[(Lean Ambrose)]

There you go. And I mentioned that Lashley was in almost the same role and was way more entertaining in TNA. I'm sure that Lashley could probably give a half ass effort like Brock without consequences but he'd rather give the fans great matches.

You won't get an argument from me about his effort in the ring at all breh...
But what I'm saying to you is that he's still entertaining and over as fukk...
You gonna deny that?...

People loved when he went "Suplex City" on John and Roman, and since he isn't there all the time wouldn't that make it easier for people who don't like those type of matches?

And when Brock came back in 2012 he wasn't on his suplex stuff just yet he hadn't started that until I think 2015, he had a dope match with John at Extreme Rules, his Punk match, the RR match with Seth and Cena....

Brock had great matches when he first came back

Absolutely...
But that Rollins and Cena joint he was on his "Suplex City" shyt yet that match was still piff...

 

[mrken12]

You won't get an argument from me about his effort in the ring at all breh...
But what I'm saying to you is that he's still entertaining and over as fukk...
You gonna deny that?...

He's not entertaining and he hasn't been in years. The only reason the Triple Threat match worked well is because 2 other people were putting effort into the match. Cena and Rollins had great matches in the past and could have stolen the show even if Brock wasn't involved.

 

[cartierhoe]

He's not entertaining and he hasn't been in years. The only reason the Triple Threat match worked well is because 2 other people were putting effort into the match. Cena and Rollins had great matches in the past and could have stolen the show even if Brock wasn't involved.

Cmon with this bro lmao Wrestlemania loved every minute Brock was out there

 

[Larry]

I personally don't care about great matches, if he's there every week, etc


I just think giving the main title to a dude for an entire year, when he's probably gonna make less than 20 appearances is stupid as fukk


He can show up twice every 3 months, that's fine. Don't put your flagship title on him. I'd rather Ronan Reigns have the strap over him

 

[(Lean Ambrose)]

He's not entertaining and he hasn't been in years. The only reason the Triple Threat match worked well is because 2 other people were putting effort into the match. Cena and Rollins had great matches in the past and could have stolen the show even if Brock wasn't involved.

We been good with each other since I stepped foot on this site...
But you full of shyt right now breh...
He hasn't been entertaining in years?...
And could Rollins and Cena put a good match on by themselves?...
Yes but don't act like the crowd wasn't for Brock in that match...

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

Brock is there exactly as much as he should be. WHEN He is there it is a big deal on a show with things that are not big deals. And he is entertaining as hell when he is there, and would likely suffer from diminshing returns if he was there all the time.

 

[Larry]

Brock is there exactly as much as he should be. WHEN He is there it is a big deal on a show with things that are not big deals. And he is entertaining as hell when he is there, and would likely suffer from diminshing returns if he was there all the time.

This is true



And also why he shouldn't be carrying the flagship title lol

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

This is true



And also why he shouldn't be carrying the flagship title lol

Why not? Why do you feel the title should be defended so reguarly

 

[Rout3r2035]

Y'all are missing the forest for the trees. Brock is holding the belt for so long because literally the last 2+ years have all been crippled to sustain the Reigns superpush. They'd probably use Brock as a part-time attraction closer to what Goldberg was his last run if they weren't so fixated on Reigns. 90% of the major problems in the company (50/50 booking, not listening to fans, people not getting over) are symptoms; the disease is still Vince's obsession.

 

[Larry]

Why not? Why do you feel the title should be defended so reguarly

It doesn't have to be defended regularly per say


But I do feel that your MAIN champion shouldn't be someone who appears less than 20 times a year though in my opinion.. Short term for a small reign yeah, but If you wanna keep the title on that person for an entire calendar year, that just doesn't make sense to me



at least be there to look mean and brawl with dudes or something, he doesn't have to actually be wrestling. It would even be straight if he appeared via satellite....


Last time I watched RAW, they had Dean Ambrose and a buncha nikkas come out and literally cut a "well shyt, the universal title ain't here so I guess ya'll gon have to wrestle against me instead" type promo.. shyt was embarrassing to watch for all parties involved.