Ok, Lynn Swann HOFer or no?

Lynn Swann a HOFer


  • Total voters
    23

LezJepzin

We Wavy
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,104
Reputation
4,845
Daps
84,849
Reppin
50East/Sacramento, CA
fukk no. He just benefited on being on being on the team of the '70s like Alvin Harper did on those Cowboys teams in the '90s . He's a real a$$hole anyway so fukk him:pacspit:
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,247
Reputation
9,397
Daps
104,272
Reppin
NULL
Is Issac Bruce in the hall?




He was 10x the player that Lynn was.



I guess people like Lynn Swann for artistic reasons?


They say his catching ability and body control was so "graceful":ld:



I remember how the media had me thinking he was a sports god, but once I decided to do some research on him, his stats had me:shaq2:.



He ain't even seeing obscure dudes like Rob Moore and Keenan Mccardell
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
38,648
Reputation
4,921
Daps
108,795
Reppin
Rotten Apple
Is Issac Bruce in the hall?




He was 10x the player that Lynn was.



I guess people like Lynn Swann for artistic reasons?


They say his catching ability and body control was so "graceful":ld:



I remember how the media had me thinking he was a sports god, but once I decided to do some research on him, his stats had me:shaq2:.



He ain't even seeing obscure dudes like Rob Moore and Keenan Mccardell
Dog before 1978, DB's were allowed to basically mug WRs all the way down field.
You can't compare WRs from that era to the modern passing era.
:what:
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,247
Reputation
530
Daps
53,762
Reppin
Las Vegas
Dog before 1978, DB's were allowed to basically mug WRs all the way down field.
You can't compare WRs from that era to the modern passing era.
:what:
which of these guys, all from the same time frame swann played, is lynn swann on a different level than?

Lynn Swann (74-82) 336 rec, 5462 yds, 51 tds, good for outside of the top 250 in receptions, 196th in receiving yards, and 96th in receiving tds

Gene Washington (69-79) 385 rec, 6856 yds, 60 TDs
Cliff Branch (72-85) 501 rec, 8685 yds, 67 TDs
Mel Gray (71-82) 351 rec, 6644 yds, 45 TDs
Ken Burrough (70-81) 421 rec, 7102 yds, 49 TDs
Isaac Curtis (73-84) 416 rec, 7101 yds, 53 TDs
Sammy White (76-85) 393 rec, 6400 yds, 50 TDs
Harold Carmichael (71-84) 590 rec, 8985 yds, 79 TDs
Ahmad Rashad (72-82) 495 rec, 6831 yds, 44 TDs
Alfred Jenkins (75-83) 360 rec, 6267 yds, 40 TDs
Drew Pearson (73-83) 489 rec, 7822 yds, 48 TDs

carmichael and branch outright shyt on dude, and the rest are as good, or slightly better than, swann. only 21 wr's in the hall, and swann is not even top ten in his own decade, yet hes enshrined. :what:
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,419
Reputation
5,932
Daps
164,641
Dog before 1978, DB's were allowed to basically mug WRs all the way down field.
You can't compare WRs from that era to the modern passing era.
:what:
compare him to his peers then

his numbers dont outshine many of his peers either
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,247
Reputation
9,397
Daps
104,272
Reppin
NULL
which of these guys, all from the same time frame swann played, is lynn swann on a different level than?

Gene Washington (69-79) 385 rec, 6856 yds, 60 TDs
Cliff Branch (72-85) 501 rec, 8685 yds, 67 TDs
Mel Gray (71-82) 351 rec, 6644 yds, 45 TDs
Ken Burrough (70-81) 421 rec, 7102 yds, 49 TDs
Isaac Curtis (73-84) 416 rec, 7101 yds, 53 TDs
Sammy White (76-85) 393 rec, 6400 yds, 50 TDs
Harold Carmichael (71-84) 590 rec, 8985 yds, 79 TDs
Ahmad Rashad (72-82) 495 rec, 6831 yds, 44 TDs
Alfred Jenkins (75-83) 360 rec, 6267 yds, 40 TDs
Drew Pearson (73-83) 489 rec, 7822 yds, 48 TDs

carmichael and branch outright shyt on dude, and the rest are as good, or slightly better than, swann


Joe Sixpack, what's up with these numbers, mang?:mjpls:
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
38,648
Reputation
4,921
Daps
108,795
Reppin
Rotten Apple
Joe Sixpack, what's up with these numbers, mang?:mjpls:

Hey I said its debatable with Swann.

I see why they put him in tho. He played for the most dominant team in the history of the NFL.
Them other dudes besides Pearson, Branch and Carmichael had no impact on the history of the league. The story of the league can be told without mentioning those other WRs

You can't speak on the history of the league without mentioning Lynn Swann.
 
Top