Ok Coli Pro-Abortionists. How Many Months In Until You Consider Abortion Wrong?

[Type Username Here]

I think within a month or month and a half is fine. If the mother's life depends on it and the child would have no reasonable chance of living due to that complication, late-term abortion should be applicable.

But with things like condoms and morning after-pills, I find the action of aborting a fetus early-mid to late-term primitive and cruel, and I don't arrive at this position from a theological source.

 

[Street Knowledge]

I'm pro choice but there's big money in the pro life movement

 

[tmonster]

you mean pro-choice? or shall I call you blastocyst?

 

[Jhoon]

As a person who has been to numerous clinics, I could probably care less about when a woman gets an abortion. If you come to conclusion that baby isn't for you 2 days after conception or 3 days before the due date, you don't want it, you don't have to keep it.

 

[Blackking]

well, I would say 0 weeks because adults should be more responsible. Having a kid isn't that horrible that you have to kill a baby.





but I have around 6 abortions. the most was 19 Weeks (i think) the rest were within the first Month. Only the last one did I actually go to the clinic

shyt's horrible.


First off, the clinic ( at least around detroit) is like a factory. You are there at least 4-6 hours because there are hundreds of women per day making appointments.

300-800 a pop THIS is Big business. They treat the women/girls like a number and treat the process like a Popeye's Chicken Drive through.... you get to pick your order and how u wanna do it.

You see girls who don't even look old enough to get pregnant.

-ALL the options suck.... you might get lucky and catch it early enough to get the Pill. But that shyt has side affects and it causes the baby to basically bleed out... which is gross. Cramps, contractions, heavy bleeding... sorta like having a baby over a couple days

-Or you get it sucked out... with seems barbaric. the doctor gives no fukk. It's sorta like .... I won't describe it... BUT sometimes, rarely, doctors have to kill the baby afterward for certain procedures.


but it's always good to have that choice
​

 

[Mr. Somebody]

The pres believes in partial birth abortions which is where they insert a metal rod into ta new born babies skull as the mother gives birth. They're literally sacrificing new born babies.

Its so demonic, friends.

 

[Scientific]

I doubt anyone on this site is pro abortion. nice flame threads

Pro-Choice is the better term.

 

[Fervid]

I doubt anyone on this site is pro abortion. nice flame threads

Pro-abortion . Like it's a fun thing to plan for the weekend.

 

[Jhoon]

Pro-abortion . Like it's a fun thing to plan for the weekend.

if youve been to a clinic, you know theres nothing fun about that place. imagine a dollar store, but enough people for walmart- on black friday. the facilities to me cant seem to meet the demand. the last time I was there, I saw this bad bytch. I said to myself she can abort all my babies

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

They always have the right to live. They just don't have the right to use another person's body to do so.

Actually you are incorrect with that statement.
Once the baby is born the parents have to care for it, if they don't it dies.
The fetus is dependant on the mother during pregnancy but perhaps even more dependant once he's born.
The baby still uses the mother's body for milk, and the entire household income to keep him/her alive.

 

[Prince.Skeletor]

no pro-choice is not a better term than pro-abortion.
because I consider myself pro-choice, I believe the baby has a choice.

Now before anyone argues and says the baby doesn't make a choice, you are incorrect!
Why? Because..

Compatibilism (or soft determinism) is the belief that free will and determinism are compatible ideas, and that it is possible to believe both without being logically inconsistent.[1] Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

 

[NoMayo15]

Actually you are incorrect with that statement.
Once the baby is born the parents have to care for it, if they don't it dies.
The fetus is dependant on the mother during pregnancy but perhaps even more dependant once he's born.
The baby still uses the mother's body for milk, and the entire household income to keep him/her alive.

You're making a lot of assumptions here for what a person must do after a pregnancy is brought to term. The biological parents don't have to care for the child. A person doesn't have to use breast milk to sustain the child, etc.

The point is, the parents have to VOLUNTARILY decide to care for the child post-pregnancy. In the previously mentioned examples, the parents could give the child up for adoption, or have some other persons take care of the child. A person could feed the child formula, instead of breast milk. These are not things mandated by the state. Why? Because one person's rights end where another person's begin.

Furthermore, a person cannot be forced to complete or end a pregnancy. But if a child might otherwise live (aka late-term), then I think generally most people agree that the pregnancy should not be ended, barring some extreme circumstance.

no pro-choice is not a better term than pro-abortion.
because I consider myself pro-choice, I believe the baby has a choice.

Now before anyone argues and says the baby doesn't make a choice, you are incorrect!
Why? Because..

Compatibilism (or soft determinism) is the belief that free will and determinism are compatible ideas, and that it is possible to believe both without being logically inconsistent.[1] Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

Well, thank you for copy and pasting something from wikipedia, without giving any kind of background as to why you think it's correct.

 

[Blackking]

no pro-choice is not a better term than pro-abortion.
because I consider myself pro-choice, I believe the baby has a choice.

Now before anyone argues and says the baby doesn't make a choice, you are incorrect!
Why? Because..

Compatibilism (or soft determinism) is the belief that free will and determinism are compatible ideas, and that it is possible to believe both without being logically inconsistent.[1] Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

you're wilin out.

 

[DEAD7]

no pro-choice is not a better term than pro-abortion.
because I consider myself pro-choice, I believe the baby has a choice.

Now before anyone argues and says the baby doesn't make a choice, you are incorrect!
Why? Because..

Compatibilism (or soft determinism) is the belief that free will and determinism are compatible ideas, and that it is possible to believe both without being logically inconsistent.[1] Compatibilists believe freedom can be present or absent in situations for reasons that have nothing to do with metaphysics.

 

[the cac mamba]

If you can show in my post where I made that assertion, I'll give you all my Coli cash.

​