She could easily tell him he can't make threats, violent rhetoric or talk about the cases. He could easily say he can't talk about the cases but he's Trump trying to intimidate and taint the cases as much as possibleObviously you didn’t read through the article…is not about being contrarians os about DC laws and how strict they are…the judge has to make an unprecedented decision b/c of who trump is…applying DC law on publicly discussing evidence etc. Applying that to a front runner candidate where he as to respond to his voters about what’s going on…the judge has to weigh that among other factors to see how she can apply DC law to trump the candidate.