Official Trump Insurrection Rally 1/6/21 Fukkery, NY Probe, DOJ Probe & Georgia Probe Thread!

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,940
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,873
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,034
Reputation
5,189
Daps
114,506
Again, as I said before, the lawyer, who now that I think about it was Andrew McCabe, former FBI Deputy Director stated that states normally pile up counts on indictments because they use each document issue as a separate count, while the feds will often group them together for 1 or 2 counts. A clear example of this is Michael Cohen from the SDNY fed case. He did not get hit with a 34 count indictment. He got hit with a 8 count. It makes sense and now that I think about it, I heard something similar before.

Steve Bannon's fed case, the one Trump pardoned him for one count for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count for conspiracy to commit money laundering. The same exact state case that he got indicted for last year had him for two counts of money laundering, two counts of conspiracy, and one count of fraud, plus one count of conspiracy that was a misdemeanor. 2 counts vs 6 counts.

So the idea that 34 counts automatically means Trump did some wild off the wall shyt to get 34 is not fully accurate. It's just how the state counts it up. If it was an SDNY case, he probably only would have been looking at a few counts.

When Trump is indicted by the feds, you're only going to be looking at a few counts. It will be interesting to see if Georgia does the same thing as NY and spread out the counts.

Also, the DA's press conference statement trying to make this sound bigger than it was, was a bit dramatic. He stated that Trump did a scheme to cover up a story and get a story killed so that it didn't hurt him in the 2016 election. Politicians do that all the time and it's not illegal. Trump's problem was simply the dirty money on how he did the payment because he's an idiot.
 

jerniebert

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,407
Reputation
3,873
Daps
79,821
Reppin
Fresno, Ca
Listen mofos getting all crazy bout this case is weak… it’s not weak, now considering the GA case and DOJ docs case yes it’s not comparable to those indictments coming down..
The only thing weak today was how weak trump looked. Some might say it's the weakest he's ever looked.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
17,034
Reputation
5,189
Daps
114,506
April 2, Episode 18 Edition of Jack Podcast. 5:15 to 6:20


Andrew McCabe - Former Deputy Director of the FBI: It is kind of the common practice in the Manhattan DA's office to charge each separate act in a conspiracy or overall serioes of criminal activities, each separate act as a separate count. That's not what we typically see on the federal side. The federal indictments read pretty cleanly as each count address a group of activity, things, actions that were taken, or conversations took place all around a particular crime. In this case, because the fundamental crime is falsification of business records, it's entirely possible that each one of those counts is a separate business record. Now we know there were 11 payments to Michael Cohen in the course of the payoff to Stormy Daniels. Compensating Cohen for the payoff to Stormy Daniels. You can imagine right there that could be charged as 11 separate counts instead of 1 count.
 

Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD

<--- Cleveland Browns winning that many, boi!
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
15,484
Reputation
-8,590
Daps
42,477
This case looks weak. Federal preemption vs New York election laws will be an issue. Alvin Bragg is reaching even though Trump is a peice of shyt
Bragg saw a crime on his watch, did the legwork and brought it up for indictment.

Can't knock Bragg for doing something where others did nothing.

Case itself is strong, the elevation to felony levels is the legal argument prosecutors will have to make. Media just mad new information wasn't part of charges.
 
Top