Official “The Athletic” thread

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

NEW YORK — Ronald Acuña Jr. never looked up from his phone. Though he sat just a few feet away in the visiting clubhouse at Citi Field on Friday afternoon, he seemingly couldn’t hear the booming voice of Freddie Freeman, even as his All-Star hype man of a teammate piled on the outsized praise like logs onto a roaring fire. Could Acuña be a 40-40 player someday? It’s not a matter of if, Freeman declared, but when. Could Acuña eventually supplant Mike Trout as the game’s best player? Here, Freeman exercised a measure of restraint. If Trout is No. 1, he said, then Acunã is on track to be 1B, “the Mike Trout of the National League.”

Not long after, Brian Snitker sat in the Braves dugout and approached Acunã’s transcendent skills with nonchalance, the kind brought on by familiarity. Informed of Freeman’s earlier proclamations, the baseball lifer who serves as the Braves’ manager simply shrugged. Then, he offered his own endorsement of Acuña, the 21-year-old phenom. A future 40-40? The NL’s version of Trout? Really? Said Snitker: “He’s that good, yeah.”

There is a major difference, of course. While the Angels have struggled to surround Trout with talent, the Braves have found enough of the right pieces to protect Acuña. It’s a major reason a second consecutive NL East title is within reach. With Sunday’s 2-1 triumph, the Braves won their eighth straight, completing a three-game sweep over the Mets. The Braves lead the division by six games, a comfortable margin despite a sustained charge by the Nationals. It’s made even more impressive by a spate of injuries that would have crushed a lesser team.

For more than a month, the Braves have been without a pair of key bats in the lineup, Nick Markakis and Dansby Swanson. Austin Riley, Ender Inciarte, and most recently, Brian McCann, have since joined them on the injured list. But the Braves have leaned on a consistent quartet atop the lineup. It includes the stalwart Freeman, another young star in Ozzie Albies and the resurgent veteran Josh Donaldson, whose pair of solo shots Sunday provided enough support for left-hander Dallas Keuchel, who tossed seven shutout innings.

Atop it all has been Acuña, the anchor in the leadoff spot on Snitker’s lineup card. He has slugged for power, created havoc on the bases and played solid defense after sliding over to a premium defensive position in center field. Acuña has elevated his game during a critical stretch.

“When you can have Ronald come up and be electric from the first pitch, it sets the tone for the whole team,” Freeman said. “It fires everyone up.”

On Friday, Acuña recorded his league-leading 30th stolen base to go along with his team-leading 36 homers. It officially put him in the 30/30 club, making him the second-youngest to join that elite company, behind only Trout. On Saturday, in a 9-5 victory, Acuña’s two-run single put the Braves ahead for good.

With the banged-up Braves scrambling to keep themselves above the fray, they’ve received elite production from their star. Since Aug. 1, Acuña’s 11 homers trail only the Reds’ breakout star Aristides Aquino for most in the National League. In that same span, Acuña is slashing .302/.380/.677 with an OPS of 1.057. Entering play, his fWAR of 1.4 since the beginning of the month was tied for the league lead with the Rockies’ Trevor Story and the Phillies’ J.T. Realmuto.

“It almost becomes comical what he can do on a baseball field,” Freeman said. “He makes everything look so easy.”

Of course, it isn’t easy. Nor is it a given that having one of the league’s top players is an E-Z Pass to success. Consider Trout’s tenure with the Angels. For all of his brilliance, he’s played in one postseason series. His team has yet to win a single playoff game. That’s been a function of the franchise’s failure to surround him with a proper supporting cast, a theme that defined the Angels’ offseason.

With run prevention as the goal, the Angels handed out one-year deals to righties Matt Harvey and Trevor Cahill to bolster the starting rotation. They also signed Cody Allen to solidify the back of the bullpen and veteran catcher Jonathan Lucroy. Power-hitting first baseman Justin Bour was added to the mix to provide some pop. But with August coming to a close, the Angels have long been knocked out of the playoff picture. Horrific performances have earned Harvey, Allen and Lucroy their respective releases. Cahill remains with the organization though he has been demoted to the bullpen. Bour has been optioned to the minors. Total production when measured by fWAR: -2.4. The total outlay: $34.35 million.

Meanwhile, while facing a similar challenge, the Braves didn’t miss. Unlike the Angels, they were coming off a division title. But the NL East was about to get more treacherous. The Phillies spent stupid money to sign Bryce Harper while also trading for Realmuto. The Nationals added Patrick Corbin to a rotation already featuring Max Scherzer and Stephen Strasburg. The Mets told everyone who would listen to “come get us.”

Like the Angels, the Braves found their answers in one-year deals. The most impactful was for Donaldson, whose one-year, $23 million has ranked among the best of the entire offseason. His value has been amplified recently given the Braves’ injuries. The veteran third baseman is slashing .265/.379/.538 with 32 homers. The Braves also brought back Markakis and McCann for a combined $8 million. For $31 million in the offseason, or just slightly less than what the Angels shelled out, the Braves successfully surrounded Acuña with an additional 4.8 wins. That doesn’t even include Kuechel, whose post-draft signing came at a cost of $13 million. The former Cy Young Award winner has a 3.78 ERA in his 13 starts, though he’s trending in the right direction. Over his past three starts — which encompass 19 innings — Kuechel has allowed just one run.

Leading up to the trade deadline, the Braves fortified their notoriously shaky bullpen, adding Chris Martin, Mark Melancon and Shane Greene. And even after the deadline, they’ve been active in adding spare parts such as catcher Francisco Cervelli, defensive shortstop Adeiny Hechavarria and speedster Billy Hamilton.

To be sure, the Braves remain flawed. But in 2019, when the juiced balls have thrown off the equilibrium of the game, such deficiencies are no longer disqualifiers when it comes to competing for a championship. They’ve got young arms in Mike Soroka and Max Fried. Both look like they could be rotation fixtures for years to come. Freeman, Albies and Acuña have all been extended, so they’re not going anywhere. Whether it’s this season, or sometime in the not-so-distant future, a victory parade through Cobb County would not be outlandish.

The conversation perpetually surrounding the Angels has been about not squandering the remainder of Trout’s prime. By contrast, the Braves are well on their way to maximizing their window with Acuña, whose skills only continue to flourish.

Said Freeman: “We’re going to be good for a long time.”

(Photo: Rich Schultz / Getty Images)
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

Nathan Peterman … Nathan Peter-MAN … Nate …

I think Raiders coach Jon Gruden probably knows he shouldn’t keep three quarterbacks … or five running backs for that matter. But I don’t think he can help himself.

There aren’t a lot of changes to our 53-man roster projection after Thursday night’s 80-yard exhibition in Winnipeg. So to make sure I keep you reading until the bottom, I’ve sprinkled in some questions from the mailbag and this week’s comments section:

(* Projected starters)

Defensive tackles: 5
In: Johnathan Hankins*, Maurice Hurst*, P.J. Hall, Ethan Westbrooks, Anthony Rush

Out: Justin Ellis, Eddie Vanderdoes, Gabe Wright

Toughest decision: Still Ellis. Rush, the undrafted rookie from UAB, was a force again Thursday night. Westbrooks is a Gruden Grinder. Can’t see them cutting Hall, their second-round pick just last year. I wonder if Ellis has any trade value.

Running count: 5

Scott P. asks, what’s up with all the playing time Mo Hurst was seeing last night? Also, after the debacle with the 80-yard field, does anything surprise you anymore with this team?

Hurst has played a lot more than you would think he should, and when asked, Gruden has pointed to the injuries on the front line. I didn’t go to the game in Winnipeg, but I was not surprised that there was a huge hole in the field and that Gruden afterward said the field was fine. I am immune.

Defensive ends: 5
In: Clelin Ferrell*, Josh Mauro*, Arden Key, Benson Mayowa, Maxx Crosby

Out: Quinton Bell, James Cowser, Alex Barrett

Toughest decision: Cowser had a sack against the Packers. He is the oldest of this group, but I think the Raiders will have to go on without him.

Running count: 10

Glenn C. asks, do you think the Raiders pass rush will be improved enough this year? Will Ferrell be explosive enough off the edge?

Key is better and the defensive tackles are better, so yes. How much? I don’t know. My over-under on Ferrell sacks is 6.5. That is a great number, and should get action on both sides.

Linebackers: 6
In: Vontaze Burfict*, Brandon Marshall*, Tahir Whitehead*, Marquel Lee, Nicholas Morrow, Kyle Wilber

Out: Jason Cabinda, Te’von Coney, Koa Farmer

Toughest decision: Morrow played well on Thursday, and I still don’t see it with Lee, but I don’t think either one is on the bubble. So none, really.

Running count: 16

Cornerbacks: 4
In: Gareon Conley*, Daryl Worley*, Trayvon Mullen, Nevin Lawson (suspended first four games), Isaiah Johnson

Out: Nick Nelson, Keisean Nixon, Dylan Mabin, Makinton Dorleant, Joshua Holsey

Toughest decision: Nelson gave up two touchdowns against the Packers. Johnson has been out with a concussion. Can Nixon sneak on the opening-day roster? He has been sticky in coverage, but I’m thinking the Raiders may be content getting him on the practice squad.

Running count: 20

Brian F. asks, Nick Nelson going to be the next wasted draft pick from the 2018 class? Brandon Parker as well.

Gruden talked up Nelson last year as the future slot corner, and then again at the start of training camp — even though that job had been filled by Lamarcus Joyner. Parker has not been sharp, but he still might be better than David Sharpe. I’m here all night, folks.

Safeties: 5
In: Johnathan Abram*, Lamarcus Joyner*, Karl Joseph, Curtis Riley, Erik Harris

Out: Jordan Richards, Dallin Leavitt

Toughest decision: To keep both Riley and Harris. They may have to choose only one of them because of all the extra offensive players.

Running count: 25

Quarterbacks: 3
In: Derek Carr*, Mike Glennon, Nathan Peterman

Toughest decision: I have changed my mind. Maybe Gruden is setting me up, but listening to him, it sure sounds like he wants to keep all three. I think he trusts Glennon more than Peterman but thinks Peterman has more long-term upside. And when you are building somebody back up like he is with Peterman, and he starts playing better, you can’t just cut him and tell him to go back on the practice squad.

Running count: 28

Paul S. asks, What’s the benefit of keeping three QBs? Realistically if Carr goes down the team isn’t strong enough to win with a backup (as is the case with most teams). So why waste a roster spot keeping two players that realistically won’t be able to carry the team if the worst happens?

Because it makes Gruden happy. Same with Carr — because Gruden is always yelling at the other two.

Running backs: 5
In: Josh Jacobs*, Doug Martin, Jalen Richard, DeAndré Washington, Keith Smith (FB)

Out: James Butler, Mack Brown, Alec Ingold (FB)

Toughest decision: Ingold should be able to clear waivers and land on the practice squad, but Gruden really likes the young fullback. Washington got the night off in Winnipeg, which has to mean his ticket is punched. Either he is on the 53 or he gets traded for a draft pick.

Running count: 33

Jaden D. asks, Is Doug Martin a lock on the 53? I don’t think you can keep four running backs and a fullback. What do you think of keeping Ingold, Jacobs, Richard and Washington? Was it alarming that Keith Smith was playing last night?

I have always thought Martin was a lock. Nothing has changed. If Jacobs was injured, I think Gruden would be most comfortable plugging in the tough-running Martin. Smith needed to play to get off some the rust off after being out with the injury.

Wide receiver: 6
In: Antonio Brown*, Tyrell Williams*, J.J. Nelson, Hunter Renfrow, Dwayne Harris, Keelan Doss

Out: Ryan Grant, Marcel Ateman, Keon Hatcher, Rico Gafford, De’Mornay Pierson-El

Toughest decision: Grant didn’t play Thursday, so like Washington, that would normally mean that he is on the 53 — or being traded for a late-round pick. I think Doss is making the roster. … Can they keep seven receivers? No. There has to be a trade at some point here.

Running count: 39

Tight ends: 3
In: Darren Waller*, Derek Carrier, Foster Moreau

Out: Paul Butler, Luke Willson. Brandon Barnes

Toughest decision: None of the first three played in Winnipeg. Sure seems like the great tight-end steel cage match is over.

Running count: 42

Offensive linemen: 8
In: Kolton Miller*, Richie Incognito* (suspended first two games), Rodney Hudson*, Trent Brown*, Jonathan Cooper, Brandon Parker, Jordan Devey, Denzelle Good, Denver Kirkland

IR: Gabe Jackson*

Out: Kirkland (when Incognito returns), David Sharpe, Tyler Roemer, Lester Cotton, Andre James, Justin Murray, Cameron Hunt.

Toughest decision: I couldn’t find another roster spot, so I decided the Raiders couldn’t carry Jackson (knee) for five games and I put him on the injured reserve list. That means he is out for the first half of the season and can come back extra healthy. To be eligible to return though, he does have to make the initial 53-man roster. So in this case, he initially makes it with Kirkland getting cut, then Kirkland returns to the team after the Raiders put Jackson on IR. Sorry Mr. Jackson, I didn’t want to choose between Riley and Harris and go with four safeties (with one of them, Joyner, playing nickel corner).

Running count: 50

Specialists: 3
In: K Daniel Carlson, P A.J. Cole, LS Andrew DePaola

Out: LS Trent Sieg

Toughest decision: Gruden was “ecstatic” about Cole’s punting again on Thursday night. And the long snapper battle is over, too.

Final count: 53

Judah S. asks, Will Jacobs be a work-horse three-down back?

It’s only a matter of when, not if.

Travis H. asks, Was wondering how you compare this team to other Raiders teams from the past as far as your impressions leaving training camp?

The veterans — even Antonio Brown, from the feet up — all came into camp in great shape and clicked with Gruden and his staff. Right tackle Trent Brown, as I said before, is dominant and could be a tone-changer like Kelechi Osemele was in 2016. The offense should be a lot better, and the defense will stop the run.

The team hasn’t really been tested in the preseason, and most guys have been given a Disneyland FastPass until the ride starts on opening night. One could argue that Kolton Miller could really use the snaps. Same with the rookies who are starting or playing a lot on defense.

If the Raiders aren’t ready to go the first two games of the season — both at home, against the Broncos and Chiefs — things could get ugly fast as the next five are on the road against very good teams.
 

RTF

2Trill
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,906
Reputation
668
Daps
12,206
Article on Alexander Arnold by Michael cox please bro
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170
Article on Alexander Arnold by Michael cox please bro
Gianluca Vialli once suggested the right back is usually the worst player on any team: any better going forward and he’d be a winger, any better defensively and he’d be a centre back.

Jamie Carragher has a similar theory. “No-one grows up wanting to be a full back,” he said a few years ago, a statement that was only around 50 percent a dig at Gary Neville.

Jose Mourinho once explained why he loved Paulo Ferreira, his right back with both Porto and Chelsea. “He’s a player who will never be man of the match, but will always score seven out of 10,” Mourinho explained. That’s the right back, Mr Seven out of 10 — surely the least glamorous position in the side.

The right back doesn’t even have the exotic feel of the left back, who tends to be a more creative player forced into defence at some point in his development because of a shortage of left-footers . You associate a left back with constant overlapping runs and devilish crosses, whereas the right back is steadier, more consistent. Under-rated. An unsung hero.

Things have changed slightly, of course, and the evolution of the full back from steady defender to a flying attacking weapon has been well-documented over the past decade or so. But full backs tend to be judged in three simple ways. (a) How well do they keep their position and get the better of opposition wingers. (b) How effectively do they offer a crossing option on the overlap? (c) How do they cope with the physical demands of those two duties, charging up and down the pitch constantly?

The full back has generally avoided being assessed in terms of possession play and creativity. Every other position has developed in that respect. From sweeper-keepers to false 9s, everyone else has become a possession-focused improvement on their former selves. But when was the last time you heard a full back praised primarily because they had good vision, were comfortable on the ball, and could pick out a great pass? For Dani Alves, those compliments followed after mention of his stamina. For Philipp Lahm, as soon as his possession play became truly appreciated, he was often deployed in midfield. Besides, neither were ever their side’s most creative outlet — both played alongside midfields surrounded by elegant playmakers.

Trent Alexander-Arnold, however, feels different to anything that has come before him. This Liverpool side doesn’t have a playmaker; indeed, they improved significantly after the departure of Philippe Coutinho, and Jurgen Klopp didn’t want him back. Fabinho is a steady holding player, decent enough in possession but no Andrea Pirlo. Jordan Henderson, Georginio Wijnaldum and James Milner are predominantly workers, and Naby Keita hasn’t quite settled. Adam Lallana and Xherdan Shaqiri aren’t regulars, while Roberto Firmino is increasingly a true nine rather than a false nine. Liverpool’s chief creator is their right back. And it’s difficult to think of another top-level club side — certainly in the modern era — who can say that.

Alexander-Arnold’s assist tally from last season shows that: 12. Three times as many as any Liverpool midfielder, twice as many as Firmino, 50 percent more than Mohamed Salah — and, OK, only one more than Andy Robertson on the opposite flank. Last season, in a 5-0 thrashing of Watford, Liverpool’s full backs got all five assists between them, Alexander-Arnold 3-2 Robertson. But Robertson feels like a typical modern full back in style, simply a very good one — when he goes forward, he’s a crosser. Alexander-Arnold is a genuine creator. He whips in crosses, of course, but he also plays lofted through-balls, fires quick passes into the feet of attackers, switches the play regularly to great effect, and can also cut inside and use his left foot.

With all that in his armoury, then, it was something of a surprise that Arsenal manager Unai Emery decided to leave him unmarked for the trip to Anfield on Saturday, using a diamond midfield. It was a calculated gamble: let Liverpool’s full backs push on, leave two men upfront, and quickly break into the channels. There were moments of promise: Nicolas Pepe caused Virgil van Dijk problems, and wasted the game’s most presentable chance at 0-0.

But Liverpool knew how to play the situation perfectly. From the outset they constantly switched play, repeatedly working Arsenal’s diamond laterally across the pitch. Sometimes these switches came from the midfielders, and Henderson’s dramatic volleyed pass out to Robertson in the ninth minute was so extravagant that it almost felt like Liverpool were making fun of Arsenal’s system.

export-6.png


But sometimes it was just the full backs switching play between themselves, like Cafu and Roberto Carlos used to for Brazil.

export-7.png


This is Liverpool’s speciality — it was a major feature of their narrow 2-1 loss to Manchester City back in January, a game that essentially cost them the title, but one that Liverpool were hugely unfortunate not to win. Their goal in that game, headed by Firmino, featured three full-back-to-full-back switches of play.

At the weekend, the inevitable happened shortly before half-time — Alexander-Arnold assist, Liverpool goal, headed in by Joel Matip. The only surprise was that it came from a set piece, a right-wing corner, rather than from open play.

export-81.png


Arsenal’s system wasn’t at fault for that one. Perhaps it was at fault, though, for Liverpool’s second. When Sadio Mane received the ball on the left, the space afforded to Alexander-Arnold was incredible — Mane couldn’t resist switching play, below.

export-101.png


After receiving the ball and dribbling forward, Alexander-Arnold fired it into Firmino’s feet. The Brazilian’s typical deft touch for Salah tempted David Luiz to pull him back — penalty, and 2-0.

export-111.png


Alexander-Arnold also played a part in the third goal, also scored by Salah. Receiving the ball in the right-back position under pressure from Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, he retreated slightly, but then rather than turning onto his right foot and hammering the ball up the touchline, as you may expect from a right back, he turned inside and played a left-footed pass to Fabinho. In turn, the Brazilian’s ball into Salah set him streaking away.

export-91.png


Also of interest was Alexander-Arnold’s positioning when Arsenal were trying to play the ball out from the back. Here, he effectively pushed forward to form a front four with Salah, Firmino and Mane, which left Jordan Henderson some 30 yards behind him, covering the right-back zone. Here, Salah closes down Arsenal’s left-sided centre-back David Luiz, while Alexander-Arnold takes care of left back Monreal.

export-121.png


This is partly, of course, because of Arsenal’s narrow diamond — Alexander-Arnold didn’t have a winger to shut down. But it was reminiscent of the way Pep Guardiola used to deploy Dani Alves when Barcelona’s pressing was at its most extreme: as a right-sided forward who retreated into a back four when required, rather than a mere overlapping full back. Alexander-Arnold’s aggressive pressing also forced Dani Ceballos into the most remarkably misplaced pass you’ll witness all season — effectively crossing the ball into his own box for a Mane chance.

export-131.png


There were also other variations. Henderson, at his best since being restored to his box-to-box role in spring, sometimes overlaps Alexander-Arnold to allow him inside into the centre.

export-151.png


Again, the right back’s ability to use his left foot makes this particularly worthwhile — he had a decent shot with his left foot here, which was blocked, and he also showed this ability on multiple occasions last season.

One such occasion came against Arsenal at the Emirates in a 1-1 draw, for a goal disallowed due to a Mane offside. But which other right back could check inside and float a perfect ball over the opposition defence with his left foot?

export-161.png


The flip side, of course, is that Alexander-Arnold is far from perfect defensively. He endured several difficult matches last season — away at Napoli in the Champions League in particular, but also against lowly Premier League sides like Southampton and Cardiff. His positioning was suspect on the opening day of the season against Norwich, and there were moments here when Arsenal failed to take advantage of the space in behind him.

But those weaknesses are inevitable for a 20-year-old who was — as with most full backs — converted to that position from a central midfielder in his late teenage years. There may be occasions when Joe Gomez is more suited to Liverpool’s right-back position for certain matches, but Alexander-Arnold’s contribution to Liverpool’s attacking play shouldn’t be underestimated — this isn’t a mere overlapping right back, but a genuine playmaker.
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

It’s written all over his face, even if Ethan Westbrooks isn’t living by his usual motto right now.

The Raiders defensive lineman is in a steel cage match for a spot on the 53-man roster, and the team is very deep at that spot this season. So while his mantra of “laugh now, cry later” is a great way to live life — we can discuss the merits of having it tattooed on your face later — Westbrooks has no time to crack up right now.

The Raiders signed the Oakland native and former Rams starter after training camp had already started. Now, Westbrooks is trying to crack a rotation full of veterans, former draft picks and undrafted sleepers. He has one thing going for him — he was called a “Gruden Grinder” by none other than the head grinder, Jon Gruden.

“Look, he’s got a history in this league and I liked him a lot when I was studying football,” the Raiders coach said during training camp. “He’s a grinder. He is a Gruden Grinder kind of guy.

“He can play the 6-technique. … He’s a good inside rusher. He’s been well trained under the Rams with (former Rams and Raiders assistant) Mike Waufle, a great defensive line coach. So, he’s an Oakland kid, he’s got a lot at stake and his versatility is going to put him in the mix.”

Westbrook has a sack this preseason, but he has also watched undrafted rookie Anthony Rush make a huge impression. And then the Raiders signed former Chargers first-round pick Corey Liuget on Sunday. And they already have Johnathan Hankins, Mo Hurst, Justin Ellis and P.J. Hall at tackle. And two of their ends, Clelin Ferrell and Josh Mauro, can also play inside.

Stress now, celebrate later?

“It’s been nothing short of a dream to wear the Raiders uniform,” Westbrooks said. “But I am just working now because no dream is complete if you don’t make the best of it. Just trying to show coaches I can make plays after I got back in shape.”

The 6-foot-4, 287-pound Westbrooks spent the first five years of his career with the Rams and played in last season’s Super Bowl. So he was surprised and a little depressed when his phone didn’t ring this offseason.

“When you’re sitting at home thinking that the league don’t need you anymore, that’s rough,” Westbrooks said. “So I tried to stay at the gym and not go home. Thankfully, the big homie Chris Long stuck his neck out for me. He let Mike Mayock know that there is a player out here for him.”

Long, his former Rams teammate, now retired, has some strong ties to the Raiders. His dad was a pretty good defensive lineman … not to mention the Hall of Famer Howie Long is good friends with Mayock, the Raiders’ general manager.

“I just gave my endorsement of him as a teammate and a kid,” Chris Long said in a telephone conversation Sunday. “Mike is a great football mind. He doesn’t need anyone’s help, but I know Mike and I’ve played with Ethan. He’s from Oakland. I was sure if he got the opportunity he’d play his ass off.

“He was one of our favorite young, promising players that joined that stacked D-line we had in St. Louis over the years. And I’ve always pulled for him because I think he brings a lot as a player.”

Not only is Westbrooks versatile and good against the pass and run, Long said he always has a smile on his face.

In fact, Westbrooks has two.

There is a happy face right next to a sad one tattooed below his left eye with those words “laugh now, cry later.”

“You’ve gotta have one or two screws loose to have a face tat,” Long said. “And that’s a good thing in a D-line room.”

So, the obvious questions. Why and when did Westbrooks get it?

He got it after high school (in Elk Grove, Calif.) after he quit a job that he hated at Toys ‘R’ Us. He was off to play football at San Joaquin Delta College in Stockton and needed some self-motivation.

“I was thinking where I wanted to get it, and then it hit me,” Westbrooks said. “I got it on my face so that it would be hard to get a normal job. I had to make it in football. I had to get to the NFL. Or else. Or else I am just a guy with a face tattoo having a hard time getting a job.

“It worked out well. No regrets.”

The face tattoo as inspiration may catch on when people hear Westbrooks’ path. He went from San Joaquin Delta to Sacramento City College to West Texas A&M to not being drafted.

Westbrooks has always traveled well. His dad, a big Raiders fan, was in the Navy and they moved often. But Oakland has always been home — he has a lot of family still in Richmond — and he wants his three kids to wear the colors like his dad and he did.

“I need to put my stamp on this,” Westbrooks said. “I want that Raiders jersey to mean something to my kids and my grandkids. It’s not just my name on the jersey, it’s my family’s name. I gotta make it do what it do.”

— Reported from Alameda

(Photo: Robert Reiners/Getty Images)
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

Keisean Nixon has never been lacking in confidence. The weekly texts from his former coach, Snoop Dogg, don’t hurt.

When the undrafted rookie cornerback from southern California and then South Carolina arrived at the Raiders training camp in Napa last month, he expected to make the 53-man roster. Nothing has changed with cut-down day five sleeps away.

He might be even more confident now, as he has shown tight coverage in the first three preseason games. Meanwhile, second-year cornerback Nick Nelson has not played well, and rookie draft pick Isaiah Johnson has been sidelined.

“If you’ve studied the film, you’ll see what we see,” Raiders coach Jon Gruden said Sunday. “He’s made more plays than any of our corners. He’s playing extremely well. He’s confident.

“I mean, he’s had a lot of ball production and he’s also been a factor on special teams, so we are really pleased with Nixon.”

Nixon took the compliment in stride, almost like that’s what his coach should say about him.

Nixon has been covering NFL receivers all his life, after all.

“Since I was little,” Nixon said Sunday. “Grew up playing against top dudes like JuJu Smith-Schuster and John Ross, grew up playing dudes like that so the competition level has always been there. So it’s just a matter of getting a feel and then just playing football like you have since you were little.”

Nixon is from Paramount, a suburb of Los Angeles. He went up against Smith-Schuster (the future Steelers receiver) and Ross (the future Bengals speedster) going all the way back to when he was in the sixth grade. They all played in the Snoop Youth Football League, founded in 2005 by rapper and mogul Snoop Dogg.

Snoop was Nixon’s coach on a couple of occasions.

“People don’t understand, Snoop Dogg is a real coach, he coaches you hard,” Nixon said. “But Jon Gruden is a different guy. I love that man, though. If he loves you, he loves you — no matter how hard people think he is on you. He shows you respect. And that goes further than just being a coach.”

Nixon attended Arizona Western College before transferring to South Carolina. He had 71 tackles, two interceptions and nine pass break-ups in two seasons for the Gamecocks, but when the NFL Draft rolled around, he didn’t have to deal with the stress and anguish of sitting through the entire event, hoping to hear his name called.

The 5-foot-10, 200-pound Nixon knew he wasn’t getting drafted.

“I actually had got a neck injury the last game of the season, so I kind of knew how it was going to play out,” Nixon said. “After that I wasn’t really focused on the draft, I was focused on getting on a team and just doing what I’ve been doing now, which is maintaining and growing.”

Nixon picked up defensive coordinator Paul Guenther’s defense pretty quickly, he said, and has been able to react without thinking. And most importantly, when the ball is in the air …

“Don’t panic,” he said. “Understand what you’ve got going on within the routes, the levels of routes, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3. (Secondary) coach Jim O’Neill really teaches that a lot here. I learned that here. More reps you get, the better you get at it.”

And especially if the reps are against some bonafide NFL playmakers. He worked out with Rams receiver Robert Woods in the offseason, and has been regularly tested by the Raiders’ improved receiving corps.

Nixon has one preseason game left, Thursday in Seattle, before he knows if he made the 53-man roster.

Starters Gareon Conley and Daryl Worley are locks, as is second-round pick Trayvon Mullen (who is just coming back from a hamstring injury). Safety Lamarcus Joyner will be the team’s primary slot corner. Nevin Lawson figures to be the No. 4 corner when he returns from a four-game PED suspension.

That opens up a spot for Nixon, as Nelson gave up two touchdowns last week against the Packers in Winnipeg and Johnson, a fourth-round pick, has not come back from what started out as a concussion.

“He’s struggling,” Gruden said of Johnson on Sunday. “He had a facial injury (Week 1) against the Rams. Not quite sure if he’ll be ready for the season opener, but he’s been out for the last couple days.”

Nixon is not looking at the depth chart. He will keep running full steam on special teams and trying to blanket receivers until someone tells him to turn in his helmet.

“Keep working,” Nixon said when asked his reaction to Gruden’s praise. “You can make plays but that don’t guarantee you a spot at the end of the day. Just do what they tell you to do, the little stuff that matters more.”

Liuget appears likely to stick on the 53-man roster
It sure sounds like newly signed defensive tackle Corey Liuget has a spot on the 53-man roster already locked up. With an intense battle for roster spots developing on a crowded defensive line, Liuget isn’t sure if he will even play in Thursday’s preseason finale.

He also said Monday that he will need a game or two to get back in the swing of things, but the former Charger said the wait will be worth it.

“I fit perfectly into this scheme,” Liuget said. “It’s a one-gap, penetrating defense. That’s what I love. That’s my style of defense. That’s what we had with the Chargers the past couple years, so I’m super excited to be in it.”

(Photo: Mark J. Rebilas / USA TODAY
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170
Tom Brady’s below-market contracts with the Patriots represent one of the great mysteries of the business of football, one that persists year after year with minimal inquiry. Scant attention is paid to the NFL’s most recognizable player consistently accepting undervalued compensation. This quiet fact in the business of football became even more magnified this week as Brady’s contract was “upgraded,” a word used loosely in this context. Let’s examine.

The “Upgrade”
Many like myself expected the Patriots to adjust Brady’s contract, if only for the 2018 season, as either a show of good faith to their superstar quarterback, a band-aid to stave off a potentially combustible situation, or something in between. Only the notoriously secretive Patriots and Brady know what is truly behind this gesture or can understand why Brady would accept it. Indeed, my first reaction to seeing this “upgrade” was: Is that all?

According to reports, the Patriots added five performance incentives to Brady’s 2018 contract, requiring him to be in the Top 5 in the NFL in five categories, with each incentive worth an additional $1 million. Such incentives would double to $2 million if the Patriots were to win the Super Bowl, although the maximum amount available to Brady is capped at $5 million. Thus, if Brady — scheduled to make $15 million in 2018 — hits all the markers of these performance incentives, even if part of a Super Bowl-winning team, he can make only an additional $5 million, bringing his 2018 compensation to a total of $20 million. In sum, the Patriots addressed the most consistently undervalued player in the NFL with incentives requiring top 5 performance in five categories. Seriously? That’s it?

Even Julio Jones, who had three years left on an existing contract signed two years ago, received almost $3 million of “real money” from the Falcons to satisfy his low rumbles of discontent. It is not uncommon for star players to receive no-strings-attached short-term cash upgrades, not ones that require earn-out through performance incentives.

Perhaps the Patriots are standing behind the precedent of giving Rob Gronkowski’s a similar $5 million incentive package last offseason. However, Brady and his agent could certainly distinguish Brady’s situation from that of Gronkowski. But that was not the case, and Tom Brady not only continues to accept undervalued and below market contracts; he also accepts a below market “upgrade” or adjustment.

The Marketplace
Several other quarterback contracts were addressed this offseason, whether as new contracts — for free agents such as Kirk Cousins, Case Keenum and Sam Bradford — or for those with a remaining year or years on their contract, like Brady. Here are a sample of what some of these players are making in 2018 total compensation, including bonus, starting with Brady’s former backup who is set to earn three times what Brady will make:

  • Jimmy Garoppolo: $42.6 million
  • Alex Smith: $40 million
  • Matt Ryan: $29.25 million
  • Kirk Cousins: $26 million
  • Blake Bortles: $19 million
  • Case Keenum: $18 million
  • Sam Bradford: $16.25 million
Further, with rookie contracts heavily weighted in the first year, Brady will also make less in 2018 — even with earn-out of all his incentives — than Baker Mayfield ($22.3 million) and Sam Darnold ($20.5 million).

Brady’s 2018 compensation could be anywhere from $15 million to $20 million. If he hits, say, four of the five markers for incentives he will make what Blake Bortles is set to receive from the Jaguars; if he hits three of the five he will make “Case Keenum money,” and if he only hits one of them he’ll slide in just below Sam Bradford. Currently, Brady is ranked 23rd in the NFL in 2018 quarterback compensation, just ahead of Andy Dalton and Nick Foles.

The Why?
Identifying Brady’s undervalued contracts is the easy part; figuring out why Brady consistently takes less is the mystery. Here are some rationalizations, justifications and accusations aimed at solving what has been an unanswered mystery about Brady’s pay.

1. Brady is a team player; he takes less to help the team.

That is a nice altruistic theory, but it shows a lack of understanding between cash and cap. As every player who is asked, Brady helps his team with short-term salary cap issues — as he did in this renegotiation — by converting salary to signing bonus, thus prorating it over the remaining years of the contract. Dozens of players around the league do this every year. And there is not only a benefit for the team but also for the player, who almost always receives his money sooner than previously scheduled.

Brady’s willingness to lower his cap number is quite different than taking less cash than he would otherwise make. Doing this affects more than the cap, which is merely an accounting tactic; it is helping ownership save on player payroll. And the Patriots are a constantly high-spending team. Per Spotrac, they were 29th in spending in the league in 2016. While that ranking improved last year, they are currently ranked 20th in the league in 2018 cash spending. Brady’s willingness to accept less money is giving the Kraft family savings that they truly don’t need to compete on the field.

2. Brady makes so much money off the field he can take less from the Patriots.

Do any other superstars in sports really do this? I negotiated contracts in the NFL from both the agent and team side for 20 years; I never heard this argument used by a player or a team. Players have a limited time frame to make as much as they can before they are put out to pasture by their teams; taking less for any reason is a fallacy.

3. Brady has a supermodel wife who makes more than he does so he can take less from the Patriots.

This one always makes me laugh. So if he had a “normal” wife, he’d negotiate more aggressively?

4. Brady receives value from the Kraft family in other ways or is promised future compensation from them following his retirement.

It is uncanny how often I hear this, even from some espousing to be Patriots’ fans. If this were the case, there would be salary cap violations galore, triggering league discipline that would make the Deflategate sanctions look like a slap on the wrist.

5. Brady accepts less due to the Patriots’ tacit endorsement of his trainer/guru Alex Guerrero.

Ditto on the salary cap violations. And reports from recent years have shown some friction between the organization and Guerrero.

These are all nice theories; I don’t really ascribe to any of them. Having said that, however, I don’t have a better one as to why Brady consistently does this.

Maybe one day, in some future book or documentary long after the Brady era, we will find out more than what we know now. For now, however, the Tom Brady pay mystery continues, only exacerbated this week by his “adjustment.”

(Top photo: Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

TORONTO — Despite being assailed by injuries during the past six weeks and enduring their first significant team-wide hitting slump since early May, the Braves have kept rolling, getting superb pitching and defense to offset a nearly two-week dip in run production and maintaining a 5 1/2-game lead on the surging Washington Nationals in the National League East.

With the September playoff drive approaching, Braves general manager Alex Anthopoulos spoke with The Athletic before Wednesday’s series finale in his old stomping grounds, Toronto, answering questions about September call-ups, the possibility of re-signing Josh Donaldson, the team’s injury situation and the near- and long-term outlook for Austin Riley. Oh, and about saying during the offseason that players were going to get more rest this season when that clearly hasn’t happened.

A few hours after the interview, the offense awakened in a 9-4 win over the Blue Jays that gave the Braves a 4-2 record in a rigorous three-city trip featuring a makeup game in Denver on Monday between a Sunday night series finale at New York and a Tuesday series opener at Toronto. The offensive outburst was a needed pick-me-up for the Braves, who totaled 40 runs while hitting a majors-worst .198 in their previous 11 games, and for star Freddie Freeman, who was 2-for-20 on the trip before Wednesday, when he had an RBI double and a homer to increase his majors-leading RBI total to 107, two off his career high.

Bench player Matt Joyce served as the designated hitter and went 3-for-5 with a homer, raising his average to .361 with nine extra-base hits and 12 RBIs in 21 starts. It was the first homer by a Braves DH since Jeff Francoeur hit one at Minnesota in 2015.

The only negative for the Braves: Catcher Francisco Cervelli, one of the four recent injury fill-ins acquired by Anthopoulos, left with a cramp or strain in his right quadriceps; he’ll be re-evaluated on the team’s off day Thursday, but the injury isn’t believed to be serious. Besides, catcher Brian McCann is expected back from the injured list either Saturday when he’s eligible or soon thereafter.

What follows is a transcript of The Athletic’s interview with Anthopoulos, with only a few answers edited for brevity.

On the status of key injured players (Dansby Swanson came off the IL on the trip; McCann, Riley, Ender Inciarte and Nick Markakis remain on the IL, with Riley on a rehab assignment and nearing his return.)

Dansby is the only one who’s come back. The other guys (besides Riley) are still a ways off. They haven’t even started rehab yet. B-Mac, we don’t think it’ll be a long stay, so we’ll see when we get back. Ender and Nick, that’ll be sometime in mid- to late-September, depending on how things go. We’re still in August. I mean, that’s not even on the radar right now. So this is what we’ve got.

Is it a certainty that Nick will be back?

Just knowing him, his recovery, his rehab work — I think he heals well — I expect him to be back. I just don’t know when. We want to make sure he’s strong.

On the team’s offensive slump and if there’s any concern

You go through a stretch one way or the other. We’ve pitched well, we’ve won some close games (during the team hitting slump). You’re just trying to win as many games as you can. It’s going to be cyclical in a lot of ways. So you’re always looking at everything — your rotation, your bullpen, your offense. Right now, we’re just a little cold.

On having the majors’ best ERA (2.64) and worst batting average in the past 11 games before Wednesday

I care more about our on-base (percentage) and (slugging percentage); I’d rather look at OPS than average. (The Braves were 24th in slugging at .375 and 27th in OBP at .288 in that 11-game span before Wednesday). But I’d say this: (Pitching) is why we won as many games as we did (during the offensive slump). It has been a tough stretch, a tough grind. Huge series (win and sweep) in New York, obviously. Some emotional games and stressful games. And even at Colorado, we had a chance. I think people are going to really be looking forward to the off day tomorrow.

On recent praise for Anthopoulos for the impressive results from under-the-radar trades or waiver claims

We would rather our guys stay healthy, and we don’t have to go and get guys outside the organization. And we do everything as a baseball-operations group — we talk about it as a group and all that. And it’s a credit to the players; they’ve done an unbelievable job filling in. (Adeiny) Hechavarría. Even the games Cervelli’s played, he’s been fantastic. Obviously Billy Hamilton — when we claimed him, we said if he can just help us win one or two games, it’s worth every penny. And he helped us win (two) in New York. With these guys, at this stage of the season, every win is so important, and if any of these guys can help us … Adeiny has helped us win more than one game. Cervelli absolutely helped us win in his first start with what he did with the bat. And (journeyman call-up Rafael) Ortega. I told our guys who are responsible for minor-league free-agent signings and so on, (Ortega) helped us win. Obviously he’s contributing every day, but the grand slam (against the Los Angeles Dodgers) helped us win a big game. Those are unbelievable signings. If they help you win one game, those are already wins for us in terms of signings and acquisitions and so on. But the players are the ones doing it, so the players should be getting the credit.


Francisco Cervelli has been one of the Braves’ late-season pickups. (Russell Lansford / USA Today)
On saying during the offseason that Markakis and other Braves regulars would get more rest days this season, but now having three (Freeman, Ronald Acuña Jr., Ozzie Albies) among the five tied for the MLB lead in games played, with Josh Donaldson just three behind them

The one thing you learn in baseball: You can’t be rigid. And you can plan all you want, but you have to be able to adjust for your plans accordingly. And you have to bank your wins. In a perfect world, guys get rest and so on, of course. In a perfect world, would our rotation have had (Mike Foltynewitz) for the whole way and (Kevin) Gausman the whole way and (Sean) Newcomb the whole way? And Ender and everybody playing? Things change, and you need to adjust. Over the course of the season, you have to adjust to all kinds of things, and one of those things has been guys have been playing.

Obviously, Snit (manager Brian Snitker) is the one who makes up the lineup at this point. Part of it as well was (Johan) Camargo was going to get more at-bats, but when he did play, he wasn’t a productive hitter. And I’m not trying to disparage him; I’m just stating the facts. And that’s why he’s down (at Triple A) getting at-bats.

So there’s a combination of things. We could have continued to force the issue and just given guys days for the sake of giving days. But part of the thought was that our bench was strong, we’d get guys more days (off). And our bench is strong. But at the end of the day, I can’t argue with the results.

That’s the thing: Yes, in theory, the plan was that. But right now, the results on the field have been good. So, Snit’s done a good job getting wins. And at the end of the day, sure, there’s all kinds of things — you’d like to line up your relievers a certain way and watch innings and all this kind of stuff. But I said this to (then-Blue Jays manager) John Gibbons during the playoffs in 2015: Whether he used David Price out of the bullpen or not, his job is to win the game. And he won the game. So at the end of the day, you’ve just got to adjust.

And Snitker makes the decisions such as lineup and bullpen usage, right?

Yeah. You can still talk and have suggestions. But he has to be held accountable. The same way I’m accountable for the roster. Now, as a front office, we may bring in a certain player and say, “This is our thought on how he’s going to be used,” but he can adjust. So we may bring in, for example, relievers for certain innings, but at the end of the day, he has to adjust. It’s about winning games. So, Camargo was going to get everyday at-bats in some capacity, move him around and all that, but you have to perform at the same time.

More on Snitker making all lineup and pitcher-usage decisions

If a player has an issue, I don’t want them coming to my office. They’ll go to his office. I think that’s a key thing. If they start going to his office, and (he says), “Don’t look at me; talk to Alex,” then what authority does he have? How does he run the clubhouse that way, then? At that point, I should just be doing the (manager’s) job. It’s just like anything else; he has his role, I have my role. Together, if we make signings or trades, I’ll talk to him. At the end of the day, I still have the final decision to make with trades and things like that, but I want his input. Same way as I may have opinions on things (that Snitker handles), but he has to ultimately decide and be accountable. You know, I can’t argue with the results.

It’s just like everything else — not everything is going to work out (that Snitker decides to do), in the same way that as a general manager not everything is going to work out. You just want to be right more than you’re wrong. Just like Snit’s not going to (hit on) every single move, every single transaction we make (isn’t going to work out). But we have to be able to adjust and tweak and change. So, we can have plans and thoughts; we all do. We can look at how the roster has changed and this and that, and we can go back and dissect why and should we have been aware of things.

On the possibility of re-signing Donaldson

If we were going to engage in anybody or were in current discussions, I wouldn’t tell you or anybody else; I wouldn’t tell anybody that. By design. Because then it becomes J.D. wants it, Nick Markakis wants it, Dallas Keuchel wants it … and then there’s another narrative. It just becomes a distraction — same way with trades. So, I don’t have a general rule or philosophy on in-season, out of season, things like that. In a perfect world, you let the season play out. You’d rather not negotiate contracts in-season, just because of the distraction. You’re focused on winning games; you don’t want to take any chance that you could take away from that. So I’d say that would be a generally preferred route. I don’t want to say it’s set in stone because there might be a scenario, whether it’s the current year or two or three from now, where we do (in-season) deals with players.

On what he takes from Riley’s performance — overwhelming in his first six weeks in the majors, then slumped before his knee injury

Young player. I’ll be curious when he comes back (from the IL) because he was scuffling before he got hurt. And now that he’s had a chance to get away, get back (from IL soon) and get some at-bats. So, long term we still feel the exact same about him. He showed us what he can be. Long term we expect him to be (the regular third baseman). But, I mean, look, he’s a young player, and he’s become a hell of an outfielder, too. I think he’s a good outfielder — he can run, his routes (to fly balls), his jumps. And for someone who hasn’t played the position before …

So if our best team is with Austin Riley in the outfield and Josh Donaldson at third base, and that makes sense, we’ll do that. I mean, it’s about winning games. It’s about being a real good team. Now, if we saw Austin Riley couldn’t play the outfield, if he just failed, then we’d have an issue. But he’s a good outfielder, and in my opinion, he’s just going to get better. And I think he’s a good third baseman who’s going to continue to get better. So there’s clearly room for both guys; we can see a team with both guys. We’re better with both guys. Problem is, one guy’s a free agent. And I expect the market for him to be strong because of the year that he’s had and what he’s done.

It’s worked out so far in the way that we’d hoped so that we can have this discussion.
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170
Part 2
On the notion of the two outfield spots not occupied by Acuña possibly going to prospects Cristian Pache and Drew Waters next season, even though they’ve each played fewer than 30 games above Double A and neither turns 21 until this winter

It’s the same argument with Riley, but Riley spent more time in Triple A than they did; they just spent the last month there. What you hope is that players, with their performance, force their way up here. Then you just make adjustments. Things change. Guys get hurt, guys can change positions, guys can move around. We love those guys (Waters and Pache); we think they’re going to be really good players. We just have no idea when. And you can’t go into a season counting on those guys in the same way that, in our minds, we think Austin is going to be a fantastic player, but I don’t think it would have made sense for us to go into the season counting on him. What if there’s an injury? What if the performance isn’t there?

You can’t rewind and go back to the offseason once the season starts. So you’re better off … I never understood the issue of having too many good players. It takes care of itself. And you want to be in a position where if not, we have too many players, we don’t have enough innings, we don’t have enough at-bats. That’s the outcome we’d love to have. That means you’re in great shape. Because ultimately things happen. It could be the first month; it could be the fifth month — look what’s going on now.

You know, from our standpoint, hopefully, those two guys emerge and force our hand. You can make trades, you can do all kinds of things. If guys are ready and playing that well, you find a way to get them up here. Just like with Riley.

On September call-ups and whether the Braves will bring up prospects or many players given they’re in a playoff race

We’ve talked about it a little. I don’t know what we’re going to do. The thought is ideally you bring up guys that have a chance to contribute and play. So we may just — our No. 1 priority is here (major-league team), but if we know guys are going to be up and rarely if ever pitch, or they’re just going to pitch in blowout scenarios or not get at-bats, (Triple-A) Gwinnett has a chance to be in the playoffs. So why not let them continue to have those guys, win and get development time and so on? With guys we think are going to be used and could contribute right away, I would expect those guys to be up early, and then we may just stagger it as needs come along.

So for the sake of argument, I don’t think you’ll see us call up a ton of arms on (Sept.) 1. When you call up a bunch of arms, in how many scenarios are they all going to pitch? So maybe it’s one or two (pitchers) or something like that. Maybe it’s a position player or two. But we haven’t made any determinations there yet. And we’ve got guys coming off the IL that’ll count.

Will you pick up Julio Teheran’s option for next season? (Thought I’d catch Anthopoulos off-guard with that question; no such luck.)

I’ll tell you this, as a general philosophy, when it comes to any guys with options, we will normally take every day that we have to make the determination. There’s no reason not to. It’s like five days after the World Series. Hopefully, you’re the last team standing. But you have more time to get a sense of everything in the offseason. There’s so much that goes into those things. But just as a general rule, as a general manager, the last day that we have to do it is the last day that we have to do it. You look at, years ago, Aaron Boone got hurt in the offseason. You just don’t know. Anything can happen. There’s just no reason to make decisions sooner than you have to.

On Foltynewicz’s improvement since returning from demotion to Triple A

He’s been great. (Slider is) much better. His release point’s better; he’s on top of it. He’s got much more depth; he’s executing it to his glove side. And everything’s better. I thought the Minnesota Twins (game), the first innings, was as good as he’s been this year and the (St. Louis) Cardinals start earlier.

On who might make the rotation for a postseason series

You have to get through September and see who’s throwing the ball well.
 

RTF

2Trill
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
4,906
Reputation
668
Daps
12,206
Sanchez’s form demeanour and salary caused divisions

And

Did Gareth Bale win?

Please and thank you
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
60,849
Reputation
17,155
Daps
341,170

Zaza Pachulia spent last season with the Detroit Pistons. He was a backup, but still gave 12 bruising minutes per night. Blake Griffin, the team’s star, loved him. Andre Drummond, the young center, learned from him. There’s value in that.

So Pachulia, 35, entered this summer believing his 16th NBA season wasn’t his last. He went into July searching for a place to spend his 17th, back in that mentorship role.

“Free agency started an interesting way,” Pachulia said in a phone interview Thursday. “Got a couple calls. Had some conversations with different teams. I don’t want to mention the teams, but it was good start.”

Pachulia’s first eight seasons were spent in Atlanta. He has a connection with the city. He’s long viewed it as a possible place for his perfect basketball swan song. But the Hawks already have their wily vet, Vince Carter, and are going young at the center spot. No openings there. There weren’t many anywhere.

Free agency moved quick. Most vacancies vanished before the holiday fireworks cracked. The game has modernized away from bigs who bash bodies and stop post scorers. Guys like Joakim Noah and Greg Monroe are still searching for jobs as September nears.

“Toward the end of July, middle of July, it got quiet,” Zaza said. “That’s where I felt (retirement was possible).”

His phone rang. Warriors executive Kirk Lacob was on the other end. The Warriors weren’t offering a backup-center spot. They were hard capped and, in this transitional summer, prioritizing youth. But what about another role in the organization?

“Even though it meant for me to start another chapter, I was as excited as (if) a team (was) calling me to play another year,” Pachulia said. “We’re not talking about just any franchise. We’re talking about the Warriors. Best in the business.”

Pachulia was officially hired by the Warriors on Thursday. They’re calling him a consultant. It was one of a number of announced moves, which included the elevation of former player Mike Dunleavy Jr. (a scout last season) to assistant general manager and the bump of Kirk Lacob’s title to executive vice president of basketball operations.

But Pachulia’s name created the most buzz. He was a beloved figure on the team’s two most recent title teams — the enforcer who’d drop a shoulder if you fouled Steph Curry hard, the fun-loving Georgian who’d go on fishing trips with Klay Thompson.

He also was thought to still be active. Go search all the available free-agent lists. Pachulia’s still on the list, right near Noah and Mo Speights, who worked out for the Lakers recently in a pursuit of the vacated DeMarcus Cousins slot that Dwight Howard now fills.

But Pachulia’s known for a couple weeks that he was done, even if it wasn’t easy to get there.

“I just tried to be as realistic as possible to myself and do what’s in the best interest of my family and the future,” Pachulia said. “You know, you can’t be selfish in this situation. You can’t just go anywhere. You want to be in the best place possible. I love this game. I love to play. But having kids … and the kids are at a age where it matters where they live and what experience they’re going to get.”

Pachulia’s last four NBA seasons were based in three cities — Dallas, Oakland and Detroit — and always on one-year deals, never with any stability beyond next June. He could’ve kept chasing his first, fading love and tried to hold out for a camp deal or overseas option.

Or he could’ve prioritized family and future with a perfect next-phase opportunity planted right in front of him. His wife loves the Bay Area. His kids were pumped. They made a ton of friends in their two years here.

“Regarding lifestyle, we’re more excited now than when I was playing,” Pachulia said. “This can be a long-term relationship. This chapter is different than what it was. The last few years, it has been one-year deals. This can be different.”

Then Zaza repeated a mindset he’s developed through his time at Harvard, where he has been taking offseason classes in the university’s famed business school.

“You can’t think about today,” Pachulia said. “You gotta think about five years later.”

So Zaza made the jump. He’s done playing hoops. He’s now on the executive side of the game. But consultant? What exactly does that mean? It’s pretty undefined, which was on purpose.

“Exploring as much as possible,” Zaza said of his plans for the upcoming season. “Getting into different departments. Little things matter. If it’s community relations, front-office management, coaching staff, marketing, business side. It’ll be all interesting and it’ll put value on my career.”

This isn’t a Jerry West front-office maven role or a Steve Nash pop-in-for-a-few-practices-per-year setup. Zaza will be around all the time. He won’t travel to every game, but he’s moving to the Bay Area and immersing himself in all aspects of the organization.

“I believe when you’re all in, you’re all in,” Zaza said.

That could definitely mean helping the coaching staff. You may see Pachulia out there after practice working with Willie Cauley-Stein on defensive positioning or delivering screen-setting tricks to Omari Spellman. Maybe Pachulia will be helping the coaching staff with the game plan on how to stop Nikola Jokic.

But full-time coaching isn’t a path he’s ready to walk down. Pachulia is interested — probably more interested — in the management side of the sport, the cash side of this business. He didn’t take those Harvard classes for nothing.

So coaching or management? Long term, in his gut, what does he expect to be doing?

“That’s a good question,” Pachulia said. “I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately. With the Harvard business programs, if you look it, you might think management is what I’m thinking about, aiming at. But even if you decide you want to go to management, you want to explore and learn all the sides of the business.”

So he’ll spend this first season exploring, officially labeled a consultant. Does that also mean he’s Klay’s boss?

“Ha! You know, giving a hard time to Klay is not going to stop,” Zaza said. “But, no, we’re friends. We’ve been talking. Since he’s been injured, (he has) a lot of time to be around the phone. I talked to him about the opportunity even though I hadn’t made up my mind. Only a few people heard about it and Klay was one of them. He was excited. Excited to be back again together even though it’s a different role.”

(Photo: Noah Graham/NBAE via Getty Images)
 
Top