Official Student Debt Cancellation Watch Thread

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,140
Reputation
5,472
Daps
105,417
Appeals court we go

Smh
So apparently ppl are saying that the judges plan to uphold the decision that it’s unconstitutional. If that happens it goes to the Supreme Court and prolly gets struck down. They pretty much bypassed the standing defense :snoop:
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
73,673
Reputation
8,522
Daps
221,890
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
So apparently ppl are saying that the judges plan to uphold the decision that it’s unconstitutional. If that happens it goes to the Supreme Court and prolly gets struck down. They pretty much bypassed the standing defense :snoop:
I wouldn’t say that cause think about it…

These people don’t have standing or harm. This opens the door to taxpayers being able to sue for anything they don’t like which will be a legal shyt show.

It’s why Amy Coney Barrett didn’t even hear 2 of the other cases they put to her on the shadow docket
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,140
Reputation
5,472
Daps
105,417
I wouldn’t say that cause think about it…

These people don’t have standing or harm. This opens the door to taxpayers being able to sue for anything they don’t like which will be a legal shyt show.

It’s why Amy Coney Barrett didn’t even hear 2 of the other cases they put to her on the shadow docket
I guess I was reading too many doomer posts on Reddit. Objectively, how do u see this going?

I see your argument about precedent if this is struck down, but with these judges, won’t all cases that go like this, go thru the same process where it ends up in the SC, where they can rule however they want, based on ideology?
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,968
Reputation
1,556
Daps
55,938
So apparently ppl are saying that the judges plan to uphold the decision that it’s unconstitutional. If that happens it goes to the Supreme Court and prolly gets struck down. They pretty much bypassed the standing defense :snoop:


District Court Judge Mark Pittman, an appointee of former President Donald Trump based in Fort Worth, said the program usurped Congress’ power to make laws.

“In this country, we are not ruled by an all-powerful executive with a pen and a phone. Instead, we are ruled by a Constitution that provides for three distinct and independent branches of government,” Pittman wrote.

He added: “The Court is not blind to the current political division in our country. But it is fundamental to the survival of our Republic that the separation of powers as outlined in our Constitution be preserved
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
73,673
Reputation
8,522
Daps
221,890
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
I guess I was reading too many doomer posts on Reddit. Objectively, how do u see this going?

I see your argument about precedent if this is struck down, but with these judges, won’t all cases that go like this, go thru the same process where it ends up in the SC, where they can rule however they want, based on ideology?

No idea. If it gets to SCOTUS, I’m not even sure they’d strike it all down.

I think Biden will have to use a different legal authority.

The 1965 Higher Education Act and explicitly say Congress granted compromise and settlement authority to not collect the debt per borrower.
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,140
Reputation
5,472
Daps
105,417
No idea. If it gets to SCOTUS, I’m not even sure they’d strike it all down.

I think Biden will have to use a different legal authority.

The 1965 Higher Education Act and explicitly say Congress granted compromise and settlement authority to not collect the debt per borrower.
Sorry can I explain this part? Not sure what u mean here
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
73,673
Reputation
8,522
Daps
221,890
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Sorry can I explain this part? Not sure what u mean here
The legal authority Biden used was the 2003 Heroes Act which said that government issued loans can be discharged in an emergency.

The COVID emergency declaration is still ongoing. So that’s why they used this authority.

But many argue the 1965 Higher Education Act which they’ve used for the payment pause (Trump also used it for the pause) has also been used to write off loans. There are people who’ve argued it’s stronger legal footing.
 
Top