Official "Spider-Man 3: No Way Home" Thread (OPEN SPOILERS)

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
31,300
Reputation
-5,530
Daps
63,018
Reppin
BK
Na man. This worked because it was special. This would be a little over the top. Just put Andrew into one of the other movies, and everyone will be happy.

Why do you guys keep saying this stupid shyt? TASM movies grossed the lowest of all the other Spiderman man movies. Nobody wants to see Garfield AT ALL except fanboys.

Sony is not doing anything with Garfield that isnt team-up related
 

Legal

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
16,086
Reputation
3,183
Daps
61,304
Reppin
NULL


Do it you pussies:francis:


That's a hard pass for me.

They need to treat this like they do Doctor Who interacting with any of their other regenerations, and make it rare and meaningful when it happens.

Also, they really just got off with a while trilogy used as origin story, and establishing that this Spider-Man can stand on his own two. Going right back to him getting lil bro'd, or at best being an equal to someone else in a movie would be a step back.

This sounds like Amy Pascal is just trying to work her way to another hit. Ol' girl needs to learn to get in on more non Spider-Man associated hits.
 

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
31,300
Reputation
-5,530
Daps
63,018
Reppin
BK
What Sony is thinking: Damn we just did another billion with This Spiderman teamup. Lets capitalize on this buy making these guys team up for a whole movie.

What the coli wants Sony to think: We should bring back Andrew Garfield & do TASM 3. Lets make less money than what we just made by resurrecting our least popular Spider Man franchise. :mjgrin:
 
Top