The "dumb shyt" was you speaking without even knowing the base PS5 already is doing that so your hypothetical Ragnarok performance on the Pro was uninformed.
I didn’t make the hypothetical.
I responded to another persons hypothetical by saying similar hardware will give you similar performance.
I didn’t check GOW stats or need to check them to make that point.
Except "similar" PC parts aren't going to be the same exact price and also we're not comparing PC to PC so comparing a console that's already ready to go vs building a PC is apples and oranges.
For the PC i posted. you can already check it’s performance vs ps5 pro reported targets,
It already meets or exceeds those targets on all the games we have info on.
Not to mention, the PS5 Pro has AMD ray tracing tech that's not available in AMD GPUs yet so a "similar" part e.g. a 4070 is damn near the cost of a Pro alone. This convo is like comparing buying a store bought meal vs going to the supermarket and buying the ingredients and making it at home. It's not exactly the same thing.
It doesn’t scale linearly like that.
Yes 4070 is closest when it comes to features because there is no AMD card out right is with those features.
No the PS5 pro doesn’t meet the raw performance of a 4070. We already have the benchmarks to prove it.
I just was telling you that the base PS5 was already doing that. Current PS5 games like GT7 being able to do 8K/60fps via PSSR and 4K/60fps with ray tracing is pretty great not to mention other games. This has been settled, the Pro is definitely more than a "small update" and y'all can say what y'all want to say about the price but no one gives a damn about all this other nonsense y'all doing in this thread.
40% more GPU is a “small update” even if that fact makes your sony stan itch
