Official Biden vs. Trump 2020 General Election Thread (Biden WINS 306 Electoral College Votes)

Who wins?

  • Joe Biden, Vice President of the USA (2009-2017)

    Votes: 440 81.6%
  • Donald Trump, President of the USA (2017-present)

    Votes: 99 18.4%

  • Total voters
    539
  • Poll closed .

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
8,929
Reputation
676
Daps
20,014
Reppin
NULL
It didn’t work . That’s why I’m telling you all of it is indicative of a party with huge, key , foundational issues .


I'm telling you have a misunderstanding of what the pick was for. VP picks for the most part don't move the needle at all and are more so about minimizing internal party outrage if anything.
 

The G.O.D II

A ha ha
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
86,353
Reputation
4,924
Daps
190,469
What? These policies were polling extremely well in the primaries. Even then people still overwhelmingly voted for the candidate that wasn't for them. What's hard to understand?

Are you really trying to use the party’s shytty insider heavy primary system as justification that progressive candidates wouldn’t do well in the general ? :dahell:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,486
Reputation
13,694
Daps
299,383
Reppin
NULL
Lol , save this post.
You nikkas learned nothing from 2020
i mean im serious tho. 78 year old donald trump running in 2024, after the ruin his health and finances are in for from 2020 to 2024? that's laughable :dead:

you need to stop giving this guy so much credit. he's a fukkin p*ssy
 

ill_will82

What you see, is what you get
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
10,398
Reputation
2,835
Daps
24,570
with all due respect, anyone who thinks donald trump is going to run in 2024 after losing in 2020 is a fukking idiot

Trump is either going to be "broke" from that massive debt he owes or in all types of legal litigation behind taxes. He probably will be in jail or narrowly escape it. If Trump loses, He's done.

If he tries to contest the results shyt will go to federal court and by then they might wipe they ass with his appeal and tell him gotfoh.
 

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,317
Reputation
13,005
Daps
91,430
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
i mean we have magazine capacity limits in cali, i don't see capacity limits as being too far. IMO, the far left pushes to ban too many types of guns and makes it prohibitively hard to have CCL or purchase perfectly "civil" handguns. if you can't stop your target with 10 bullets, you need to learn to shoot :ld:
I appreciate you breh, but I promise the bolded isn't true. I teach MMA, self-defense, and firearms self-defense. I train a lot and under stress I'd be very happy if I landed 5/10 shots on a person trying to kill me. Stress and adrenaline dumps are just too strong. When you're in fear for your life it all goes out the window. If I had 10 rounds and was attacked by 2 people I'd be VERY happy if I could land 2 shots on each. That'd be very lucky. And 2 shots a piece is likely to not stop either of them right away. I've seen a guy take 7 rounds of .45 hollow points right to the gut/chest, and live long enough to still fight the guy that shot him for 1 full minute, and then run off.

Bullets aren't magic death rays. Especially pistol bullets. They usually make people run away, which is good. But if I have training and am not confident with 10 rounds against 2 people, I promise you a woman with very little if any training doesn't have a prayer.
:mjcry:

This is truly not a hill worth Dems dying on. People that talk about banning 10+ capacity mags (no offense) don't understand how violent life or death scenarios unfold, or how firearms and ballistics work. Don't expect you to. It's all good. But trust us when we say the Dems don't need to be fighting that battle. Even though rifles or shotguns of any kind including hunting ones are responsible for only like 2% of all murders in the U.S. and that's it, be happy most of us agree with you on assault weapons and take that W.
 
Top