Official Biden vs. Trump 2020 General Election Thread (Biden WINS 306 Electoral College Votes)

[Foxmulder]

Twitter changes policy after Biden article block

How the fukk are these rich ceo dudes so fukking spineless. Have a policy stick with it and tell whoever don’t like it to kick fukking rocks. Now they say they are allowing hacked materials as long as the hackers aren’t sharing it

 

[the cac mamba]

How the fukk are these rich ceo dudes so fukking spineless. Have a policy stick with it and tell whoever don’t like it to kick fukking rocks. Now they say they are allowing hacked materials as long as the hackers aren’t sharing it

i just hope they ban trump around election day

 

[NZA]

if pollsters are wrong again, we have to accept that this shyt is only slightly better than miss cleo

 

[The Fukin Prophecy]

How the fukk are these rich ceo dudes so fukking spineless. Have a policy stick with it and tell whoever don’t like it to kick fukking rocks. Now they say they are allowing hacked materials as long as the hackers aren’t sharing it

The equivalent of sayin, its ok for someone to randomly yell fire in a theater, make your own judgement if you want to believe it or not...

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

if pollsters are wrong again, we have to accept that this shyt is only slightly better than miss cleo

They weren't wrong in 2016 as people make it out to be.

That said, these polls suggest that Trump has no chance so there will be no nitpicking this time..

If they are wrong this time it will be by such a wide margin that it will render polling data meaningless.

 

[winb83]

if pollsters are wrong again, we have to accept that this shyt is only slightly better than miss cleo

The pollsters weren't wrong. The interpretation of their data was wrong. If the pollsters say Clinton is up 3.2 points in Michigan and the margin of error is 3.8 points and Trump wins Michigan by 0.02% the pollsters accounted for Trump possibly winning.

 

[Robbie3000]

If only I knew someone with a Trump sign around my way, the things my dogs would do to it...

Man, I miss my Huskie. Such a great Dog.

 

[NZA]

The pollsters weren't wrong. The interpretation of their data was wrong. If the pollsters say Clinton is up 3.2 points in Michigan and the margin of error is 3.8 points and Trump wins Michigan by 0.02% the pollsters accounted for Trump possibly winning.

since they know the media takes their results and contextualizes it, the pollsters should start the narrative. the polls should have enough context to prevent what keeps happening

 

[King Static X]

Barnes is a Trumper and he’s betting money on Trump winning. But this shid is terrifying.




The polls gonna be wrong by 7% in WI again?

Biden is doing decently better with white, non-college educated voters than Hillary

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The pollsters weren't wrong. The interpretation of their data was wrong. If the pollsters say Clinton is up 3.2 points in Michigan and the margin of error is 3.8 points and Trump wins Michigan by 0.02% the pollsters accounted for Trump possibly winning.

HINT: Trump stole the election and it won't be revealed that Russians changed votes for a few decades

 

[the cac mamba]

HINT: Trump stole the election and it won't be revealed that Russians changed votes for a few decades

 

[Baka's Weird Case]

since they know the media takes their results and contextualizes it, the pollsters should start the narrative. the polls should have enough context to prevent what keeps happening

538 do a good job of contextualizing it. they always point out that the fact trump has a 13 percent chance of winning takes into account the possibility of polling errors. back in 2016 i remember reading on the morning of the election there that even though HRC was predicted to win by a big margin, her probability was still lower than Obamas in 2012 because so many swing states were polling in the margin of error.

the problem is more on the end of media for not paying attention to this.

 

[King Static X]

Better to downplay the numbers are else too many Democratic voters are going to get complacent. Whether what she said is true or not, it's a smart strategy to downplay the situation and not believe like you're headed towards a landslide like the Trump campaign is doing

 

[MushroomX]

There will always be Anxiety because of the high stakes for this election, plus the 2016 shocker. However Trump has allocated his money either to lawyers trying to push this election to the courts/or his lawsuits. Senators are already trying to focus on stopping Biden in the senate. Plus his rallies have had lower attendance, along with the energy not being there as much.

I would say Biden is realistically a 7-7.5 National lead.

 

[NZA]

538 do a good job of contextualizing it. they always point out that the fact trump has a 13 percent chance of winning takes into account the possibility of polling errors. back in 2016 i remember reading on the morning of the election there that even though HRC was predicted to win by a big margin, her probability was still lower than Obamas in 2012 because so many swing states were polling in the margin of error.

the problem is more on the end of media for not paying attention to this.

here is nate silver teaching the GMA audience to use poll leads to predict hillary as the winner