Official Biden vs. Trump 2020 General Election Thread (Biden WINS 306 Electoral College Votes)

Who wins?

  • Joe Biden, Vice President of the USA (2009-2017)

    Votes: 440 81.6%
  • Donald Trump, President of the USA (2017-present)

    Votes: 99 18.4%

  • Total voters
    539
  • Poll closed .

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,373
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,711
Reppin
The Deep State
This polling was consistent with prior to Election Day as well.
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Clinton: Favorable/Unfavorable

She may have been popular prior to the campaign but the spotlight and attacks quickly diminished that as we can see through unfavorable polling.

Also, all your polls are prior to the campaign. Bad data points there. Closest poll you have is from 6/15. Prior to primaries really getting underway. Show me something during the campaign season that indicates she was the most popular politician and you'll have a better leg to stand on
No shyt. I'm talking about prior to the campaign. The woman was the most liked politician in the USA for 6 consecutive years. Period. Point blank. The point is that no one should have been surprised she ran and kicked everyone's ass in 2015-2016 during the primary.

You're moving the goalposts.

I'm talking about how OBVIOUS it was that she would run for president and her preference by voters and polls to be the candidate.

You can only talk about her standing after the campaign.

Stay focused. We saw that slight of hand you conniving bullshytter :ufdup:

Cut that white boy shyt out. You're part of the reason we're in this mess. :stopitslime:
 

Piff Huxtable

Delaney 2020,2024,2028...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,956
Reputation
1,381
Daps
26,867
There's no real valid good reason to loathe Hillary Clinton, the way so many profess to.
loathe is too strong a word, but she was imo a shytty secretary of state (Kerry was much better) and ran an awful campaign

still to this day i don't know why many high profile Dems cleared the way for her in 2016

If we are honest, as a politician it's been downhill for her since she couldn't put Obama away on Super Tuesday in 2008. She simply doesn't have the gift her husband has :yeshrug:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,373
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,711
Reppin
The Deep State
loathe is too strong a word, but she was imo a shytty secretary of state (Kerry was much better) and ran an awful campaign

still to this day i don't know why many high profile Dems cleared the way for her in 2016

If we are honest, as a politician it's been downhill for her since she couldn't put Obama away on Super Tuesday in 2008. She simply doesn't have the gift her husband has :yeshrug:
If you want me to critique Hillary one thing is that had Obama not chosen her as Secretary of State, we probably wouldn't be here.
 

Scholar

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
8,939
Reputation
795
Daps
24,342
No shyt. I'm talking about prior to the campaign. The woman was the most liked politician in the USA for 6 consecutive years. Period. Point blank. The point is that no one should have been surprised she ran and kicked everyone's ass in 2015-2016 during the primary.

You're moving the goalposts.

I'm talking about how OBVIOUS it was that she would run for president and her preference by voters and polls to be the candidate.

You can only talk about her standing after the campaign.

Stay focused. We saw that slight of hand you conniving bullshytter :ufdup:

Cut that white boy shyt out. You're part of the reason we're in this mess. :stopitslime:
Not white but I like how you throwing that in to side step :dead:
I'm not arguing she shouldn't have run. That's silly. I'm saying the idea that she was popular didn't withstand the pressures of a campaign :yeshrug:. Sure while she was out of the spotlight she had some nice polling but what does that matter if it doesn't translate to her actual campaign :snoop:.So effectively popular before running but that quickly subsided into the 2nd worst (to Trump) unfavorable rating for a presidential candidate in history,
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,373
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,711
Reppin
The Deep State
Not white but I like how you throwing that in to side step :dead:
I'm not arguing she shouldn't have run. That's silly. I'm saying the idea that she was popular didn't withstand the pressures of a campaign :yeshrug:. Sure while she was out of the spotlight she had some nice polling but what does that matter if it doesn't translate to her actual campaign :snoop:.So effectively popular before running but that quickly subsided into the 2nd worst (to Trump) unfavorable rating for a presidential candidate in history,
The reason Michelle Obama won't run for anything is that her popularity will drop precipitously if she even announces a run.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,834
Reputation
18,847
Daps
282,419

I'm sorry (not sorry) but this dude is gonna lose by 5 points and a lot of folks gonna look stupid. Refusing to debate Graham was dumb too, btw. Yes I get that Graham didn't take a test, but there is no evidence Graham has covid and the debate would be socially distanced. It's not like with Trump, where dude is still sick and wanted to debate in person.

I feel like this is worse than Beto because at least there, you had so many non voters that you could at least "see" how he could win by flipping the map/demographics Obama-style. That's not happening in South Carolina, with Trump at the top of the ticket. And just like Beto, he's running a national campaign instead of focusing on the state.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,373
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,711
Reppin
The Deep State
I'm sorry (not sorry) but this dude is gonna lose by 5 points and a lot of folks gonna look stupid. Refusing to debate Graham was dumb too, btw. Yes I get that Graham didn't take a test, but there is no evidence Graham has covid and the debate would be socially distanced. It's not like with Trump, where dude is still sick and wanted to debate in person.

I feel like this is worse than Beto because at least there, you had so many non voters that you could at least "see" how he could win by flipping the map/demographics Obama-style. That's not happening in South Carolina, with Trump at the top of the ticket. And just like Beto, he's running a national campaign instead of focusing on the state.
Beto, Abrams, Gillum, :snoop:
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,834
Reputation
18,847
Daps
282,419
Beto, Abrams, Gillum, :snoop:

Abrams would probably be on her way to winning a senate seat right now. Instead she's going to spend the next few years as nothing more than an MSNBC guest. Beto could be winning a seat right now...instead he embarrassed himself running for president, talking about taking guns away. And Gillum....don't even get me started man.



Gillum would be sitting pretty right now, if not for that nonsense. He'd be poised to either challenge Rubio's seat in 2022, or take on DeSantis again. In an alternate reality we'd be in a thread right now arguing over which race he should run. Personally, I'd say governor. Rubio can probably hold that seat for decades, whereas DeSantis is in trouble.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,373
Reputation
-34,294
Daps
618,711
Reppin
The Deep State
Abrams would probably be on her way to winning a senate seat right now. Instead she's going to spend the next few years as nothing more than an MSNBC guest. Beto could be winning a seat right now...instead he embarrassed himself running for president, talking about taking guns away. And Gillum....don't even get me started man.



Gillum would be sitting pretty right now, if not for that nonsense. He'd be poised to either challenge Rubio's seat in 2022, or take on DeSantis again. In an alternate reality we'd be in a thread right now arguing over which race he should run. Personally, I'd say governor. Rubio can probably hold that seat for decades, whereas DeSantis is in trouble.

I still think Gillum was set up.

Abrams just annoys the fukk outta me with her "project" that no one sees on the ground.

Beto's married to the daughter of a billionaire. He was LARPing the whole time.

Southern democrats are just LOST man.

And what's fukked up is that Jaime Harrison is THE type of democrat I want in the South. he's the prototype...and it may not be enough :snoop:
 

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,607
Daps
102,224
Reppin
Atlanta
I still think Gillum was set up.

Abrams just annoys the fukk outta me with her "project" that no one sees on the ground.

Beto's married to the daughter of a billionaire. He was LARPing the whole time.

Southern democrats are just LOST man.

And what's fukked up is that Jaime Harrison is THE type of democrat I want in the South. he's the prototype...and it may not be enough :snoop:
Such a shytty post. :hhh:
 
Top