Prob because it’s down to these two in the primary ?Any others? If this is the norm rather than the exception, why did Teachout frame it like this was a singular problem Biden faced?
Prob because it’s down to these two in the primary ?Any others? If this is the norm rather than the exception, why did Teachout frame it like this was a singular problem Biden faced?
And if Biden wins?Prob because it’s down to these two in the primary ?
protecting biden now is counter productive cause trump is going to use all this stuff in the general and biden wont be able to cry to dem establishment hacks to protect him. and trump will win again, the answer to beating trump isnt picking the worst candidate and then trying to hide all his corruption.And if Biden wins?
She just hamstrung the democratic nominee with the word corrupt.
She could have said he is beholden to lobbyists.
Now Trump even has impeachment fodder, cause he can now claim, "you are impeaching me for investigating Hunter Biden but even you admit Biden is corrupt"
Teachout could have said he is beholden to lobbyists...she used corrupt.
Initially I thought she misspoke, but Teachout's no fool.
Wo are people in the Democratic party ready to burn everything down and sabotage the nominee if Bernie doesn't win?
the only sabotage will be by the dem establishment from picking the candidate the majority of the voters wantAnd if Biden wins?
She just hamstrung the democratic nominee with the word corrupt.
She could have said he is beholden to lobbyists.
Now Trump even has impeachment fodder, cause he can now claim, "you are impeaching me for investigating Hunter Biden but even you admit Biden is corrupt"
Teachout could have said he is beholden to lobbyists...she used corrupt.
Initially I thought she misspoke, but Teachout's no fool.
Are people in the Democratic party ready to burn everything down and sabotage the nominee if Bernie doesn't win?
Okthe only sabotage will be by the dem establishment from picking the candidate the majority of the voters want
I don’t buy it either cause it’s coming from typical strategists whose track record is not goodI gotta ask...is there ANY concrete evidence that what that team is doing has actually hurt Bernie other than salty attacks from mainstream journalists and blue checkmark twitter? Because this dude does a ton of soap boxing about the campaign strategy considering Bernie has gained steam and survived being completely ignored by mainstream sources and than attacked constantly. But I'm to believe these people are a mess and doing a bad job?
And this isn't a defense. The apology annoys me. Sometimes Sirota oversteps and you can look at the Ben Dixon vs Briahna Gray Joy thread for how her tweets and beliefs can be twisted into an attack. But I'm completely uncertain that any of their behavior is hurting when Bernie's always been attacked in bad faith. Do they make it easier? Idk..but people often make that a bygone conclusion as if they missed how messy last election was with well know operatives running things.