Of course not, the Senate as it currently stands will not pass any progressive legislation. It’s a fukked institution. Which is why support Warren. Most of her plans account for that. She’s the candidate that most understands that the executive office will have to be the primary method of enacting progressive change in this current era, and ties that to the necessary grassroots mass-movement. Top down AND bottom up.Calm down, do you think a Republican Senate is looking to pass her plans? Not an indictment of her just of 'plans' being the end all be all.
The problem with doing things through executive action is that you're one election away from all of your policies being reversed so your plans could be reversed before they have a chance to have their effects seen.Of course not, the Senate as it currently stands will not pass any progressive legislation. It’s a fukked institution. Which is why support Warren. Most of her plans account for that. She’s the candidate that most understands that the executive office will have to be the primary method of enacting progressive change in this current era, and ties that to the necessary grassroots mass-movement. Top down AND bottom up.
Bernie appears to be an institutionalist, he refuses to support eradicating the filibuster and hasn’t adapted his thinking from the protest candidate of 2016 to a legitimate front-runner candidate of 2020. He rarely talks about using the executive office tools that would be at his disposal as President, instead pivoting to the “revolution” and forcing change through the fukked legislative branch.
Yep, but it's the only way to get shyt done right now in this absolutely broken system. But I'm not just talking about executive orders, I'm also talking about executive agencies. There is actually a lot of progressive action that can be taken by FTC, DOJ, HUD, HHS, DOE, Education, EPA, etc. Liz's plans incorporate these agencies. The broader progressive revolution will come whether Bernie or Liz wins, and it would be a tragic waste to cede all that executive originated progress that can reorganize society from the top down while we wait for Congress to become un-fukked.The problem with doing things through executive action is that you're one election away from all of your policies being reversed so your plans could be reversed before they have a chance to have their effects seen.
It's really not. The executive of any state has the right to enforce housing violations. That's like, basic government 101.because the later is virtue signaling bullshyt
It's really not. The executive of any state has the right to enforce housing violations. That's like, basic government 101.
Unless you're a democrat. Then it's just virtual signaling.![]()
Actually, states can enforce rent controls.Housing violations? I don't think that's the term you're looking for...
Unless you're stripping people of their property rights you're not going to have a say in what is built. If you're punitively blocking people from building within zoning or changing the zoning because of x that isn't going to stand up to legal challenges and or compensation.
Actually, states can enforce rent controls.
Actually, it does. The question was about stopping gentrification generally. You made it seem like there is no legal remedy at all. But the greater point was states can actually pass laws that control how the housing market functions from a financial standpoint.tf, this has nothing to do with rent control. Stop trolling.
Sanders: “We’re going to tell the developers you just can’t come in and build expensive condos and drive working class people out."
Actually, it does. The question was about stopping gentrification generally. You made it seem like there is no legal remedy at all. But the greater point was states can actually past laws that control how the housing market functions from a financial standpoint.
On the other hand, if the policies are popular and the next candidate endorses them, they will catch on and become the norm. The way things are now, any Dem who wins the presidency will have to use EAs to get things done.The problem with doing things through executive action is that you're one election away from all of your policies being reversed so your plans could be reversed before they have a chance to have their effects seen.