Official 2020 Democratic Primary Debate Thread

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
51,665
Reputation
12,092
Daps
191,782
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
Yeah I identified @wire28 running to Warren G’s a while back but ima forgive his transgressions. Everyone else tho :ufdup:
giphy.gif
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,841
Reppin
the ether
I remember @FAH1223 showing a poll that had Bernie within 3-4 points of Biden in SC :mjlol:
There were multiple including the NBC Marist one :yeshrug:

It's completely possible those really were the accurate numbers at that time. Exit polls show that 47% of voters stated that Rep. Clyburn's endorsement was "very important" or "the most important" factor in their vote, and Clyburn didn't endorse until Wednesday. If that's true, then it's very easy to believe that half of Biden's support didn't come until the end of the race.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,760
Reputation
3,002
Daps
92,282
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia
It's completely possible those really were the accurate numbers at that time. Exit polls show that 47% of voters stated that Rep. Clyburn's endorsement was "very important" or "the most important" factor in their vote, and Clyburn didn't endorse until Wednesday. If that's true, then it's very easy to believe that half of Biden's support didn't come until the end of the race.
Do you believe these were voters who had already settled on an candidate and switched to Biden, or were these undecided voters that were baked into the polling?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,841
Reppin
the ether
Do you believe these were voters who had already settled on an candidate and switched to Biden, or were these undecided voters that were baked into the polling?

Both, as well as voters who had chosen Biden already but were made much more confident after Clyburn's endorsement and considered that a factor even though they were already going to vote for Biden anyway.

The day before Clyburn's endorsement, the rolling average looked like this:

Biden: 30
Bernie: 22
Steyer: 13
Warren: 9
Buttigieg: 9
Klobuchar: 4
Gabbard: 3
Undecided: 10

It's worth noting that that was already a big jump from earlier in the week. Before the debate, Biden was only at 23, Bernie was at 21, Steyer was at 16, Buttigieg was at 11, and Klobuchar was at 7 (undecideds were also 11). So Biden's solid debate performance had already pulled away some support from Steyer, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and the undecideds (while Warren and Bernie were essentially unchanged after the debate). So Biden already had some momentum.

Let's pretend that Clyburn's endorsement was the only major factor that changed shyt in the last three days. That would suggest that Clyburn's endorsement meant nearly all the undecideds ran to Biden, and he also pulled off 1-2% from each of the other candidates.


That's a huge fukking factor. It would legitimately suggest to me that if Clyburn had endorsed Bernie, it is very believable that Bernie might have squeezed out a win or at least made it very close and the race would be effectively over. Or, if Clyburn had endorses Steyer, Warren, or Buttigieg, it could have propelled any of those three to a very close 3-way race with Sanders and Biden and injected new life into their campaign. This has to be the most consequential endorsement I remember seeing so soon before a primary.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,760
Reputation
3,002
Daps
92,282
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia
Both, as well as voters who had chosen Biden already but were made much more confident after Clyburn's endorsement and considered that a factor even though they were already going to vote for Biden anyway.

The day before Clyburn's endorsement, the rolling average looked like this:

Biden: 30
Bernie: 22
Steyer: 13
Warren: 9
Buttigieg: 9
Klobuchar: 4
Gabbard: 3
Undecided: 10

It's worth noting that that was already a big jump from earlier in the week. Before the debate, Biden was only at 23, Bernie was at 21, Steyer was at 16, Buttigieg was at 11, and Klobuchar was at 7 (undecideds were also 11). So Biden's solid debate performance had already pulled away some support from Steyer, Buttigieg, Klobuchar, and the undecideds (while Warren and Bernie were essentially unchanged after the debate). So Biden already had some momentum.

Let's pretend that Clyburn's endorsement was the only major factor that changed shyt in the last three days. That would suggest that Clyburn's endorsement meant nearly all the undecideds ran to Biden, and he also pulled off 1-2% from each of the other candidates.
Props for the breakdown :ehh:
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,477
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,837
Reppin
NULL
It's completely possible those really were the accurate numbers at that time. Exit polls show that 47% of voters stated that Rep. Clyburn's endorsement was "very important" or "the most important" factor in their vote, and Clyburn didn't endorse until Wednesday. If that's true, then it's very easy to believe that half of Biden's support didn't come until the end of the race.

You can't trust polls with so many contenders. People are fickle. Some of these people probably fluctuate between 2/3 candidates on a daily basis. Also these media orgs who oftentimes sponsor these polls have a very direct interest in "massaging" the numbers when it comes to the turnout/likely voter models they used. At the end of the day, maybe 1% of the people following the news will dig into those numbers, let alone know how they may affect the reported percentages.

I honestly believe Bernie's numbers would not look very impressive if this were a 2 man race. Yes he definitely has a core group of die hard supporters, but I think against Biden he won't even hit the mid 40s.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,841
Reppin
the ether
You can't trust polls with so many contenders. People are fickle. Some of these people probably fluctuate between 2/3 candidates on a daily basis. Also these media orgs who oftentimes sponsor these polls have a very direct interest in "massaging" the numbers when it comes to the turnout/likely voter models they used. At the end of the day, maybe 1% of the people following the news will dig into those numbers, let alone know how they may affect the reported percentages.

I honestly believe Bernie's numbers would not look very impressive if this were a 2 man race. Yes he definitely has a core group of die hard supporters, but I think against Biden he won't even hit the mid 40s.

I can't find them now, but earlier there were some head-to-head two man polls and Bernie beat Biden straight up.
 

SubZeroDegrees

50 shots in the blender.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
34,320
Reputation
3,716
Daps
75,414
Reppin
Nawlins
Southern black voters at this point vote for whoever the establishment tells them to vote for. If you look at whoever the establishment candidate is that's who's gonna win down there. They obviously broke ranks with Obama but traditionally they just follow marching orders.

I have been said the Deep South was Biden lock. All the southern black congressmen will overlook their constituents to endorse the most established candidate. Biden will get Alabama, Tennesee, Oklahoma, and Arkansas on Tuesday. Thank gawd, its low delegates states.
 

South Paw

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
35,003
Reputation
1,890
Daps
40,242
Reppin
CML
I have been said the Deep South was Biden lock. All the southern black congressmen will overlook their constituents to endorse the most established candidate. Biden will get Alabama, Tennesee, Oklahoma, and Arkansas on Tuesday. Thank gawd, its low delegates states.
Yeah and Sanders will still get delegates there
 
Top