My god dude, if you believe chanting "Guilty!" at Hillary Clinton, who is embroiled in the most prominent political-legal scandal of the day, is insane, you're most likely a stan. They weren't chanting "Kill her!" or "fukk that bytch!", they were pushing an already dominant narrative. If you knew anything about human behaviour and perception you would know that repetition is a powerful tool in branding. If you say something enough, you can alter perception. Creating a soundbite sized clip that can be easily played and shared on social media and television news is a smart move.
at Hillary being factually blasted for destroying the Middle East and North Africa while acting with being guilty of wrongdoing in her duties, and your takeaway is that she's a sympathetic figure. You sure you're not a stan?
And no, the goal is not necessarily to win over the increasingly non-existent swing voter. Voter turnout is the main platform on which the political battles of this hyper-partisan era are waged. And you're calling me the WOAT political advisor? Have you been right about a single thing during this election cycle? I hope you find employment with the HRC campaign