the british english commentary kept reminding viewers he is the Englishman..Nigeria
i had to watch this fight in every broadcast..show hbo then skysports..
the british english commentary kept reminding viewers he is the Englishman..Nigeria
That was his biggest mistake imo.I ain't really been in to boxing like that since like ortiz/May but watched this last night cuz I got to support joshua but correct me of I'm wrong but is someone that supposedly the next big thing suppose to have dips like that against a 41 year old on the decline?
At the start of the 5th he just started bulldozing vlad like he had a bus to catch then he gassed himself and that's when the fight started. Just didn't see any composure or finesse to what he was doing. Glad he got the TKO but it turned into a war which it shouldn't have. Tyson fury must be licking his chops
It might not matter when he's fighting nobodies but it would matter against other dangerous fighters.Those punches didn't matter...the fight was already over & stopped by the referee at that point
Simply put... Wilder isn't technically sound enough for me to pick him. Dude struggled with Gerald Washington and was probably down on the cards before knocking him out.
Its only so long that a fighter can survive like that.
A negative on Wilder is throwing punches and forcing a stoppage, a negative isn't on Joshua for throwing wild and forcing a stoppage.
SMH.
Its not realistic or valid criticism, if Washington was in a position to fire back and did fire back you would have a point, but the man literally doesn't do this until the fighter is ready to go. So when you tell me he is wild as fukk in fights, and you expect me to take that as a legit criticism but you literally can't show any examples outside of the end of fights where he gets stoppages, you leave me with no choice to say its just blind hate.
As for using his jab, he was gettign better and better, but last fight after the lay off is the first fight I've seen him in where he couldn't get his jab off. He used it beautifully against Stiverne as well as the left hook off the jab.
He hasn't fought anyone on the level of Wlad that lost to Tyson Fury and struggled against Bryan Jennings, that a world beater right ther. LOL.
I'd say Stiverne, Arreola, Washington, and Spitzka provide Wilder with a better overall resume than Joshua.And despite Wlad losing to Fury and struggling against Jennings, Wilder STILL hasn't fought anybody as good as that
Thanks for making my point. Swinging wild against bums and swinging wild against someone like Wlad who even at 43 years old is smart enough to wether the storm and comeback in the same round and knockdown your wild ass is 2 totally different things.
I know you seem to be upset because I CRITICIZED your nikka on some shyt he needs to work on, but you defending wild and sloppy boxing because homie is finishing bums with it is the same as defending UFC fighters when they do wild and sloppy boxing to finish an opponent to me.
Youre only as good as you come up against and that shyt is a weakness that works against weakass heavyweights.
And I didn't show you any examples because I didn't go look for any examples
Stiverne is the only one I dont consider a bum out of everyone you named.I'd say Stiverne, Arreola, Washington, and Spitzka provide Wilder with a better overall resume than Joshua.
You aren't making much of a point, Joshua punched himself out, then was wild swinging at the in to force a stoppage, nothing wrong with that. That said if Wilder had landed on Wlad, Wlad wouldn't have weathered the storm, he would have been out cold, that is the difference in their power.
I'm not upset with you at all, I disagree with you and I'm telling you exactly why I disagree. Either you can handle disagreement or you can't.
Funny how Arreola, Stiverne, Washington, Scott, Spitka, and Dunhaupas are bums now.
You literally have to lie at the end because you know you don't have a point any more. ;)