*NSFW* A$AP Bari "sexually assaults" groupie

Luken

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,051
Reputation
-284
Daps
39,405
Reppin
Toronto/ Jersey / ATL / LA / Panoramic Roofs
1. No it is not the same. Police being filmed are usually in public places which means that anything the HUMAN EYE can see, can be filmed WITHOUT consent and they cannot LEGALLY tell you that you have to stop recording. It is also why dash cams and body cams FOR the police are legal, because again in a public space filming anyone and anything you can see with your naked eye is legal. A hotel room is NOT a public space. So this statement is plainly false. The only thing a person can do is sent you a Cease/Desist order if you then use that picture or footage on an outlet of some sort.

2. Touching ANYONE when they don't want to be LEGALLY is assault. And if that person is nude and in a "sexual situation" then yes it can be legally defined as sexual assault. This ain't rocket science my nikka.





Laying with someone nude is NOT consent. Consent is if the encounter continued and she did not protest and was lucid enough to protest if she wanted to.



My homies wouldn't be dumb enough to put it on tape....


dont get how people are missing this...... most basic point in this thread....
 

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,203
Reputation
14,767
Daps
273,913
dont get how people are missing this...... most basic point in this thread....

nikkas out here living by street law, unwritten rules that they somehow believe they could use to argue from when they get into legal trouble.

nikkas in the Blacc Chyna thread were baffled at how Rob could get in trouble for revenge porn because there are already other nude pictures of her online.

:mjlol:

This is what type of nikkas we're dealing with, the types that will let their own ignorance sink them and try to blame white supremacy.
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,474
Daps
136,049
Question. What's Ian Connor getting at when he shows a picture of some other chick and states to do the math? I know he had his issues with their crew over sexual assault, but is he saying this vindicates him in some way? I don't get it.
 

Luken

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,051
Reputation
-284
Daps
39,405
Reppin
Toronto/ Jersey / ATL / LA / Panoramic Roofs
nikkas out here living by street law, unwritten rules that they somehow believe they could use to argue from when they get into legal trouble.

nikkas in the Blacc Chyna thread were baffled at how Rob could get in trouble for revenge porn because there are already other nude pictures of her online.

:mjlol:

This is what type of nikkas we're dealing with, the types that will let their own ignorance sink them and try to blame white supremacy.

shiet eh, nikkas out here really thinking that slapping a girl on the butt or touching a girl unwantedly WONT get them hemmed up in a whole bunch of legal troubles?:mjlol:

breh, even though im in canada, its the same shyt here, a girl can presses sexual charges against you even if its the most minuscule thing like a drunk cheek kiss, your life and reputation are over.
 

NotaPAWG

Banned
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
22,774
Reputation
6,490
Daps
79,969
You like throwing up strawmen.



Who else would go in a room with multiple men, and butt ass naked in a bed with one of them if she wasn't a prostitute or groupie. I don't know if women really out here checking for bari like that to do what she did.

you're assuming she entered the room with multiple men just because the video shows multiple men in camera. what if she was just in the room with dude in bed and the others came in after?
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,310
Reputation
4,045
Daps
46,228
nikkas out here living by street law, unwritten rules that they somehow believe they could use to argue from when they get into legal trouble.

nikkas in the Blacc Chyna thread were baffled at how Rob could get in trouble for revenge porn because there are already other nude pictures of her online.

:mjlol:

This is what type of nikkas we're dealing with, the types that will let their own ignorance sink them and try to blame white supremacy.

shiet eh, nikkas out here really thinking that slapping a girl on the butt or touching a girl unwantedly WONT get them hemmed up in a whole bunch of legal troubles?:mjlol:

breh, even though im in canada, its the same shyt here, a girl can presses sexual charges against you even if its the most minuscule thing like a drunk cheek kiss, your life and reputation are over.

Or they go into the same "THE EMASCULATION OF nikkaS, you can't even slap a bytch on the ass no more! :damn:"

Because you know...sexual assault makes you a real nikka. :rudy:
 

HopeKillCure

Banned
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
12,754
Reputation
5,318
Daps
61,782
Reppin
On a queue
nikkas out here living by street law, unwritten rules that they somehow believe they could use to argue from when they get into legal trouble.

nikkas in the Blacc Chyna thread were baffled at how Rob could get in trouble for revenge porn because there are already other nude pictures of her online.

:mjlol:

This is what type of nikkas we're dealing with, the types that will let their own ignorance sink them and try to blame white supremacy.
First Coli nikkah need to stop talking about shyt they don't know or have never experienced like fukking experts.

Dangerously unqualified nikkahs in this thread giving out legal definitions and law advice...like what the fukk some of y'all talking bout?

This happened in England. The legal system there is different from America. Could go on about the fact that even though some elements are shared, y'all trying to attach American law to a foreign country is so insane.

nikkahs are then googling legal definitions for assault, and sexual assault and rape, but have no idea what they talking about.

nikkahs have no legal training. No college credits. No law school credits . No JD. Nothing, but trying to explain shyt to you legally when they know fucc all about the technical parts of the law.

I have law school credits and know fucc all about the law. I'm not here talking foolishness about what someone can do legally or be charged with because the law is "Grey". If nikkahs actually knew what they were talking about they would know that the law even when things are clearly written is always 1 big maybe.

That is the reason we have a federal Supreme Court in America. The "maybes" are the reason why every State has its own Supreme Court. Courts use common law statues for many things but States are not bound by common law statues and each state has freedom for their own legal interpretations.

Most states don't even get their laws from statues, real law comes from lower court rulings, and appellate courts that decide what the lower courts rule on appeal. There is no such thing as straight forward in the law.

Americas legal system is a living, changing organism. Things get overturned and law that used to be the standard becomes obsolete when new precedent happens or a higher court overturns the ruling.

nikkahs speaking casually on the law like experts who aren't even fukking lawyers are ridiculous.

Be outraged if ya'll want but don't talk law when y'all nikkahs have no JDs and no legal experience at all.
 
Last edited:

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,310
Reputation
4,045
Daps
46,228
First Coli nikkah need to stop talking about shyt they don't know or have experienced like fukking experts.

Dangerously unqualified nikkahs in this thread giving out legal definitions and law advice...like what the fukk some of y'all talking bout?

This happened in England. The legal system there is different from America.

nikkahs then are then googling legal definitions for assault, and sexual assault and, rape and have no idea what they talking about.

nikkahs have no legal training. No college credits. No law school credits . No JD. Nothing, but trying to explain shyt to you legally when they know fucc all about the technical parts of the law.

I have law school credits and know fucc all about the law. I'm not hear talking foolishness about what someone can do legally or not because the law is "Grey". If nikkahs actually knew what they were talking about they would know that the law even when things are clearly written is always 1 big maybe.

That is the reason we have a federal Supreme Court in America. The "maybes" are the reason why every States has its own Supreme Court. Courts use common law statues for many things but States are not bound by common law statues and each state has freedom for their own legal interpretations.

Most states don't even get their laws from statues, real law comes from lower court rulings, and appellate courts that decide what the lower courts rule on appeal. There is no such thing as straight forward in the law.

Americas legal system is a living, changing, organism. Things get overturned and law that used to be the standard becomes obsolete when new precedent happens or a higher court overturns the ruling.

nikkahs speaking casually on the law like experts who aren't even fukking lawyers are ridiculous.

Be outraged if ya'll want but don't talk law when y'all nikkahs have no JDs and no legal experience at all.


What in the actual hell is this wall of fukking nonsense? :dahell:

My bad I forgot I need to pass the BAR to know what a law is...hol up lemme apply to law school right quick...


FOH :camby:
 

One

Moreese Bickham with the pistol
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Messages
2,014
Reputation
1,215
Daps
11,037
That is the reason we have a federal Supreme Court in America. The "maybes" are the reason why every State has its own Supreme Court. Courts use common law statues for many things but States are not bound by common law statues and each state has freedom for their own legal interpretations.
We'll patiently wait for you to google name the sexual assault cases that went to the Federal Supreme Court due to state "maybes" or "legal interpretations".
 

HopeKillCure

Banned
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
12,754
Reputation
5,318
Daps
61,782
Reppin
On a queue
We'll patiently wait for you to google name the sexual assault cases that went to the Federal Supreme Court due to state "maybes" or "legal interpretations".
Why would I do this? What would I get for it?

Praise and admission of falsehoods from a dumbass?

Make it something worth doing for me.


Or nah, you can look these up yourself. Lexus cost money but if you google you can find legal cases related to sexual assault by district.
 
Last edited:
Top