Okay. That won't happen.
The 2nd Amendment isn't about hunting.
Also, what does me hunting with a crossbow or any other weapon have anything to do with this?
You're real close to also being placed on ignored.
save your threats dude. am I supposed to change something about the way I post so you don't put me on ignore? (I got a new sig)
saying "that won't happen" is conjecture at best. using language like that is a great way to be wrong
my point about 'hunting' is that dude in the video presented a m1 (or something similar) as a "hunting rifle". it's a semi-auto former military weapon that can be used for hunting. just like a fully-auto weapon could be used for hunting, and probably be pretty effective
a fully-auto weapon would be pretty effective for self-defense as well. but if you concede full-auto guns should be regulated, I don't see how moving the bar to semi-auto rifles is that different (semi-auto handguns is another story)
I bring up the bow because people like to defend their right to hunt with an appeal to 'sportsmanship'. that's fine, but then they should have no problem hunting with a bolt-action rifle. you're right that's not what the 2nd Amendment is about, but never the less it (hunting) is an issue that constantly comes up in the gun control debate
" and the other half is like "Whaddya expect, they're Americans 
"
