No thread on the outing of our alien brehs?

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,179
Reputation
3,826
Daps
103,525
I mean, there’s 4000 year old paintings on a cave wall in Australia for these creatures so :yeshrug:

Thing is, I’m not fluent in this stuff so I forget or mix things up all the time in regards all the information I’ve come across lately.

I’m familiar with Grusch and military lingo though so that’s easier.

Carson is talking too much wild shyt for me to keep up at the moment

Carson to me is more of an alternate hisory path that makes more sense to me. Especially in light of new discoveries. When the astronaut theory makes far more sense than anything we were previously told.
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
74,092
Reputation
15,625
Daps
285,092
Reppin
The Truth
Carson to me is more of an alternate hisory path that makes more sense to me. Especially in light of new discoveries. When the astronaut theory makes far more sense than anything we were previously told.
Yeah he explains it very well but there’s so much shyt he tosses out at once, i have to like make a mental list of things to look up.

Not just in some UFO or ancient history shyt either. It’s metaphysics, science, medicine, etc.

The claims about the bible are… interesting to say the least
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
They were lying too breh apparently :mjlol:

It was the same midget crackhead that they’re government said it was…

Three lil girls (THREE), military police (one that died afterwards), soldiers, firefighters, and doctors, couldn’t tell the difference between a lil human mentally ill man and something else:dead:


WTF are you talking about?


NO ONE thought the mentally ill man was an alien outside of the three girls. Everything else was rumors of shyt, no additional sightings of him. The police and military straight up said, "It was just this guy" and denied having been hunting aliens or doing any special operations beyond normally planned training exercises. I'm not aware of any firefighters claiming they saw him.


The police officer who died a few weeks after the event had a hospital infection from a cyst on his arm that was scheduled for surgery before any of the UFO shyt even started. He never claimed any contact with aliens, the conspiracy theorists threw him into the pile after the fact solely because he was a soldier who died.


The "doctors" rumor was a completely different incident about "two super short aliens" spotted in the hospital, who were verified to be a dwarf couple that was giving birth there. I'm not aware of any doctors being involved in that claimed sighting, but it shows you what dumb stuff happens when hysteria hits.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
But imagine how arrogant you have to be to believe that these people (multiple people) are so stupid and incompetent that they can’t tell the difference between a grown man and something else?

A mentally ill person (who apparently everyone in the area knew) and Rastafarians though:dead:


There are literally tens of thousands of crypto sightings that end up being traced back to misidentifications of people. :dahell:

Like, you seriously are operating under the belief that no human being has ever mistook another human being for a ghost, monster, bigfoot, werewolf, mutant, demon, alien, or any other paranormal creature?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
These nikkas are going on ignore at this point. They literally just regurgitating the same dumb shyt that the Brazilian government regurgitated like 30 years ago and trying to pass it off as facts.

Derailing the whole thread. I used to just skip over their posts because it’s like this in every forum. As soon as he gets proven wrong it’s long winded post after long winded post with a clear objective


You're gonna need to refresh my memory on that one. :dead:


You keep insisting this weird shyt bout "white rastafarians" when I've given you a dozen quotes from the kids saying what they saw was a black man.

I'm still waiting for you to explain how rastafarian is less likely explanation than alien when the initial statements from the kids said they saw a LONG HAIRED BLACK MAN.



You're problem is that you heard the adult statements first, years after the fact when they'd be coached, and cemented that in your mind as the truth before seeing the completely different statements they made the first days after the sightings, before the UFO people got a hold of them. And now you're not even willing to consider that the initial statements before they all started talking together and getting things suggested are going to be closer to the truth than the distant memories warped by suggestions and wishful thinking.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
You're the debunker Breh. I'm going to wait for the data from NASA to the questions you asked and then we can talk.


I just wanted to give you a chance. You said you think it's extraterrestrial, but you can't even tell me how big it is or whether it's moving.



I don't feel like the time to lay out all the evidence, especially considering the way y'all have been talking greasy. So just to summarize:


1. The object is less than 2 feet across, but probably larger than a few inches. Let's say a foot across or so.

2. The object is most likely spherical

3. The object is well above the ground, but likely closer to the ground than it is to the UAV photographing it. Let's say a few hundred feet or so off the ground.

4. The object is not maneuvering in any unusual way

5. The object is either not moving, moving slowly in a straight line, or moving quickly in a straight line. The apparent high speed is actually a parallax effect caused by the high speed of the UAV and the panning camera tracking the object, it's difficult to tell whether there is even any motion outside of parallax. It might be possible to independently determine the speed of the object, if any, with careful calculations of the background movement, but the video may be too short without good enough definition to do that.







6. Anti-Western forces in the Middle East have been using balloons repeatedly for a wide range of actions, including carrying cameras, carrying small incendiary devices, interfering with jets, and interfering with radar.








My own opinion? It's most likely a spherical mylar balloon, more likely to have been a purposeful part of rebel operations rather than just a kid's party balloon. It could have been released for numerous reasons, but one of the most interesting possibilities is that its sole purpose is to distract the drone operator. Every moment that the drone's camera is looking at that balloon, it's not looking somewhere else, and perhaps someone was about to do something somewhere else and didn't want to be looked at.

Second most likely is that it's a spherical drone. There are several types that have been built for 10+ years now, and at that resolution their non-spherical parts would not be visible.









Of course, there is so little information in that video that nothing could be said for sure. But when something as innocent as "balloon blowing in the wind" is a legitimate and probably most likely possibility, I don't find the video particularly compelling.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
19,518
Reputation
6,890
Daps
77,211
Reppin
Occulonimbus edoequus
I just wanted to give you a chance. You said you think it's extraterrestrial, but you can't even tell me how big it is or whether it's moving.



I don't feel like the time to lay out all the evidence, especially considering the way y'all have been talking greasy. So just to summarize:


1. The object is less than 2 feet across, but probably larger than a few inches. Let's say a foot across or so.

2. The object is most likely spherical

3. The object is well above the ground, but likely closer to the ground than it is to the UAV photographing it. Let's say a few hundred feet or so off the ground.

4. The object is not maneuvering in any unusual way

5. The object is either not moving, moving slowly in a straight line, or moving quickly in a straight line. The apparent high speed is actually a parallax effect caused by the high speed of the UAV and the panning camera tracking the object, it's difficult to tell whether there is even any motion outside of parallax. It might be possible to independently determine the speed of the object, if any, with careful calculations of the background movement, but the video may be too short without good enough definition to do that.







6. Anti-Western forces in the Middle East have been using balloons repeatedly for a wide range of actions, including carrying cameras, carrying small incendiary devices, interfering with jets, and interfering with radar.








My own opinion? It's most likely a spherical mylar balloon, more likely to have been a purposeful part of rebel operations rather than just a kid's party balloon. It could have been released for numerous reasons, but one of the most interesting possibilities is that its sole purpose is to distract the drone operator. Every moment that the drone's camera is looking at that balloon, it's not looking somewhere else, and perhaps someone was about to do something somewhere else and didn't want to be looked at.

Second most likely is that it's a spherical drone. There are several types that have been built for 10+ years now, and at that resolution their non-spherical parts would not be visible.









Of course, there is so little information in that video that nothing could be said for sure. But when something as innocent as "balloon blowing in the wind" is a legitimate and probably most likely possibility, I don't find the video particularly compelling.


Very interesting take. Thanks for that.

You're the hero that we don't deserve.

Spherical drone. Mylar Balloon.

Possible.

We'll see what the experts say since they own the technology and they are stumped.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,275
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
I don’t have these issues. At this point I can acknowledge they have tech hell that’s not the surprise. I’m more surprised that private contractors are the ones keeping government out.
And you came to the conclusion they have 'alien tech' based on what? Can't rely on Gov't. reports, can't rely on eyewitnesses, can't rely on blurry video, can't rely on journalists, can't rely on documentaries, can't rely on old cave drawings, etc.

If every source of information is untrustworthy (except for those YOU consider trustworthy), then what is your criterion and why should anyone else adhere to it?​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,275
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,179
Reputation
3,826
Daps
103,525
And you came to the conclusion they have 'alien tech' based on what? Can't rely on Gov't. reports, can't rely on eyewitnesses, can't rely on blurry video, can't rely on journalists, can't rely on documentaries, can't rely on old cave drawings, etc.

If every source of information is untrustworthy (except for those YOU consider trustworthy), then what is your criterion and why should anyone else adhere to it?​

I don’t know where you keep coming from look you don’t believe that’s cool. I’m not trying to convince you. That’s on you. I’m not going to try to persuade or sale you either. You will either believe or you won’t. It’s the same with religion and relationships. You do you player.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,275
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
I don’t know where you keep coming from look you don’t believe that’s cool. I’m not trying to convince you. That’s on you. I’m not going to try to persuade or sale you either. You will either believe or you won’t. It’s the same with religion and relationships. You do you player.
Really? So this entire thread you've been arguing that there are extraterrestrials, that they've come here, and the Gov't is keeping it a secret because you're not trying to convince me (or anyone else) that is the case?

Okay.

:hubie:
 

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,179
Reputation
3,826
Daps
103,525
Really? So this entire thread you've been arguing that there are extraterrestrials, that they've come here, and the Gov't is keeping it a secret because you're not trying to convince me (or anyone else) that is the case?

Okay.

:hubie:
It is extra terrestrial life. That’s on you if you don’t believe. It’s like some of you brehs just want to argue and debate. Breh I don’t give a damn if you don’t believe. I believe. Seems logical as hell to me considering uhh you know history and multiple Indian heritages say the same type of thing.
 
Top