No thread on the outing of our alien brehs?

[O.T.I.S.]

@Gloxina wouldn't that go against what the Bible and Christianity teaches on how humans came to be?

I don’t think it necessarily would because, we won’t really know until we find them an ask.

Basically, religion is based on heavenly beings based on other realms… some of the NHI are described as being from other realms as well, as well as some that are in this realm and aware of the beings in other realms

I think people are hung up on these greys when Grusch insinuated that there are more than one species. So who said we came from “Greys”

 

[O.T.I.S.]

You’re so disingenuous… that Zimbabwe sighting is not easily debunked. In fact it hasn’t been debunked at all.

You’re not even approaching this topic from a realm of objectivity.

I just watched the Ruwa interviews earlier, from the grown adults that were children during that time and I fully believe them. You see the same little kids that were on tv in these new interviews as adults.

It was never debunked, they just basically said “the kids were hallucinating” and that was it

It’s crazy, people will believe a government that says “it didn’t happen”, while actually having reason for an ulterior motive, instead of the actual witnesses who literally are ordinary people who have shyt to gain from this.

Despite some of the people who worked for these governments saying that at the time, they gave these misinformation statements

 

[CobaltBlue]

I just watched the Ruwa interviews earlier, from the grown adults that were children during that time and I fully believe them. You see the same little kids that were on tv in these new interviews as adults.

It was never debunked, they just basically said “the kids were hallucinating” and that was it

It’s crazy, people will believe a government that says “it didn’t happen”, while actually having reason for an ulterior motive, instead of the actual witnesses who literally are ordinary people who have shyt to gain from this.

Despite some of the people who worked for these governments saying that at the time, they gave these misinformation statements

Exactly. Yea I saw a doc a while ago about it, and the interviews with them as adults.

If you weren’t there, all you can objectively say with the evidence provided, is either you BELIEVE it, or not. I believe it. Very compelling eyewitness testimony from children who have no reason to lie, let alone double down on a lie in adulthood. Their lives were profoundly impacted by that encounter.

 

[Jean Jacket]

You’re so disingenuous… that Zimbabwe sighting is not easily debunked. In fact it hasn’t been debunked at all.

You’re not even approaching this topic from a realm of objectivity.

Nobody has debunked the school sighting.

I saw a Zoom conference during COVID with a Brehette that was there as a child. She remembers everything vividly.

All of those children were affected.

There was a documentary that was in development for years with footage and interviews never seen....but something or someone has been sabotaging it.


EDIT: THE FILM WAS RELEASED LAST YEAR...
THE ARIEL PHENOMENON

I want to see what the grifter Mick West had to say about it.

I'm sure he'll jump on the "shared trauma" wave and swear the school kids devised a plan to manipulate the media.

Look into the details on this one. It is very interesting.

 

[humminbird]

has the vegas family ever said anything else?
did the aliens take over their bodies

 

[CobaltBlue]

Nobody has debunked the school sighting.

I saw a Zoom conference during COVID with a Brehette that was there as a child. She remembers everything vividly.

All of those children were affected.

There was a documentary that was in development for years with footage and interviews never seen....but something or someone has been sabotaging it.

I want to see what the grifter Mick West had to say about it.

I'm sure he'll jump on the "shared trauma" wave and swear the school kids devised a plan to manipulate the media.

Look into the details on this one. It is very interesting.

Ok. Never heard of Mick West. Will definitely check into it.

This is one of those rare instances where NOBODY that wasn’t there can tell ANYBODY else what to think about it. There’s not an authority that exists that can get me to believe 62 children made up the same story and stuck with it through adulthood. And it was all about a message of peace and good stewardship for this earth. Matter of fact fukk ANYBODY who disagrees.

 

[O.T.I.S.]

has the vegas family ever said anything else?
did the aliens take over their bodies

They released a longer video but thats it

They were strapped in the vid so I’m starting to believe there was something really back there.

 

[GoFlipAPack]

fukk them bytch ass aliens


Wait which kind of aliens we talking about again? Independence Day, Signs, Mars attacks, The Day the Earth stood still, War of the World's, Edge of tomorrow, The Tomorrow War?

 

[Jean Jacket]

has the vegas family ever said anything else?
did the aliens take over their bodies

Them MFs was on some grade A peyote...

They said that the owner had a Ring camera facing the tractors and shyt.


A neighbor's ring camera did record a huge boom at the time. Vegas news reported the actual Ring footage with the sound.

Knapp said that they are expecting more video as the story develops.

I'm 50/50 on believing this one.

 

[Dave24]

has the vegas family ever said anything else?
did the aliens take over their bodies

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

His logic based off the tablets makes far more sense than the theory of evolution and than simply put our ancestors clearly said visitors from above or another realm and multiple depictions of flying craft and folks coming from above with flames. Along with pyramids being on multiple continents. And the fact we still have sightings of other type of creatures along with items such as the crystal skulls and ark of the covenant.

Please, watch this.......



Puma Punku ( 3:38 )

The Pyramids ( 22:41 )

Baalbek, ( 37:40 )

Incan sites ( 55:33 )

Easter Island ( 1:01:33 )

Pacal's rocket ( 1:05:36 )

The Nazca Lines ( 1:13:10 )

Tolima "fighter jets ( 1:21:16 )

Egyptian "light bulb" ( 1:27:01 )

Ufo's in ancient art ( 1:36:08 )

The crystal skulls ( 1:46:38 )

Ezekiel's Wheel ( 1:58:17 )

Ancient nuclear warfare ( 2:11:16 )

Vimana's ( 2:20:50 )

Anunnaki ( 2:32:52 )

Nephilim ( 2:54:37)

Conclusion ( 3:07:10)​

 

[NatiboyB]

Please, watch this.......



Puma Punku ( 3:38 )

The Pyramids ( 22:41 )

Baalbek, ( 37:40 )

Incan sites ( 55:33 )

Easter Island ( 1:01:33 )

Pacal's rocket ( 1:05:36 )

The Nazca Lines ( 1:13:10 )

Tolima "fighter jets ( 1:21:16 )

Egyptian "light bulb" ( 1:27:01 )

Ufo's in ancient art ( 1:36:08 )

The crystal skulls ( 1:46:38 )

Ezekiel's Wheel ( 1:58:17 )

Ancient nuclear warfare ( 2:11:16 )

Vimana's ( 2:20:50 )

Anunnaki ( 2:32:52 )

Nephilim ( 2:54:37)

Conclusion ( 3:07:10)​

Nope anunaki gang we up. Just about anything can be debunked/believed ultimately you choose what to believe in until you learn the truth/facts.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

You’re so disingenuous… that Zimbabwe sighting is not easily debunked. In fact it hasn’t been debunked at all.

You’re not even approaching this topic from a realm of objectivity.

Did you read the article or no? These links are even better, especially detailed with the timeline and specifics of initial events.

Ariel School

ARIEL SCHOOL

threedollarkit.weebly.com

Ariel Analysis

ARIEL SCHOOL

threedollarkit.weebly.com

1. The reentry of the Zenit-2 rocket two nights before had created a light show over Africa, leading to hundreds of claimed UFO sightings across the country that everyone was talking about, including children. The 4th-grade class at Arial School specifically had a class discussion about UFOs the same week the sighting occurred. Several children reported a different UFO sighting the day before the main event, with a complete different-looking craft.


2. Some children during recess reported seeing an alien running around in the trees, with a UFO. The trees in question were at least 700 feet beyond the school boundary which was the furthest the children were allowed to go. Most children out at recess said they had seen nothing.


3. The intial interviewer, Cynthia Hind, was a UFO enthusiast who interviewed the children in groups (something you never do with eyewitnesses especially children, because it leads them to latch onto the other stories in their group) and almost certainly planted the ideas in their head.


4. Even with the group interviews, only a fraction of the children reported seeing something, while most children said nothing happened and no adults saw it. It's difficult to determine the exact number of actual eyewitnesses, but there are ~30 out of 250 children who have an interview statement attached to a name, and some of those 30 didn't see a UFO. 62 of the children made a drawing of the events, but many of the drawings are clearly copied from each other and no one spoke to these children to ask how many actually saw the thing and how many were just completing the assignmnet by copying.


5. Some children reported one man, some reported 2, some reported up to four. Some described him as a normal Black man but with long straight hair, while others reported one or more little gray aliens fitting the conventional description but wearing Black clothes. A few reported blank faces with no features. The descriptions fit into wildly different categories.

It seems almost definitive that the original sighting was of a long-haired mixed-race man, perhaps someone who looked slightly odd and thus surprised the white kids, and then the alien descriptors were added afterwards due to mass hysteria. They fit into basically three main categories, likely of kids who were copying each other's stories:

Remember that these sightings are occurring at 700+ feet away:

"We saw a black man running around."

"I didn’t see the spaceship but I saw the little black guy, he looked - he was all black, and it looked like he had long hair."

"The hair was a bit like Michael Jackson, and they had on a black suit."

"It almost looked like a real person except it was fairly plump... At first I thought it was just some boy from the compound playing around, but... it looked more like our hair, it wasn’t curly [most children at the school were white]. That thing almost looked like a hippie."

'There's a little man running around in a one-piece suit with a band around his head. Come quickly and see.'"

And I saw a black man, he was just in black, and he had big eyes... I thought it was an alien, and then I thought maybe it was the gardener or someone."

"I saw the little black men. They had longish hair and it was all black. And they had big black eyes, that’s all I saw.

"We saw two people. One had long black hair, the other one was bald, and they both had large eyes."

"He looked like, definitely not a human... He had a big head and big black eyes and was dressed in a black bodysuit, tight fitting... [Arms and legs] like a human’s but he definitely didn’t look like one, his head was much too big."

"We saw some people - a white one, a red one, a black one. The black one was sitting on the spaceship."

"We saw aliens in tight black suits, faces exposed, who seemed to be walking around like in slow motion."

"And there was another one running in the grass. He ran normally like us, but bouncy as if a human would run on the moon."

"I couldn't see the eyes or the nose or the mouth. It was just blank, like a piece of paper."

"I couldn’t see his nose, his nose was quite small. And his mouth was quite small. His eyes were shaped like kinda pointy."

Notice that numerous children, in both the descriptions and the drawings, ONLY see a black man. They didn't see a UFO at all.

6. The second interviewer, UFO enthusiast John Mack, came 2.5 months later. Suddenly now the kids reported telepathic messages they had not reported before. Suddenly now the kids reported pro-environment messages they had not reported before. Does it surprise you that John Mack is a noted environmental activist who claims to recover hundreds of UFO sightings and abductions?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

4. Many of the children who were asked to draw the UFOs made various versions of the exact sort of things that were being shown on TV, a silver flying saucer with lights and windows and a bulge on top, standing on footpads. Note that these drawings were all made 3+ days after the event, after an entire weekend of news reporting UFO sightings and showing standard stock fictional UFO images on TV.

"Invaders" TV show, which aired 1967-1968:

"Lost in Space", which aired 1965-1968:

Some children drawings from Ruwa:

Many of their pictures, though, don't look quite like a typical "flying saucer", but instead something bulky and oblong with big windows, often with a figure sitting on top. And I think these give the best clue as to what the real object was:

Look at those pictures. Since when are aliens described as long-haired black guys? Since when do aliens sit/stand on top of their vehicle? Why would an alien craft have all those big-ass windows or even something that looks like a windshield? Why do some of the kids draw the standard grays with TV flying saucers, but half or more of the kids are drawing normal-looking long-haired people with something that looks an awful lot like a van?

It's hippies standing hanging out on their fukking van in the grass, breh.

A few long-haired guys, 700+ feet away, with a van parked in the long grass, the bright midday sun probably reflecting off of it so it looks like it has lights, viewed by some impressionable young kids during a week of UFO hysteria.




Edit: This isn't in the article but I just realized it myself. Why do some of the kids say no faces, but most of them say big black eyes, often lying a little lower on the head? Well, at over 700 feet away you can't hardly see someone's face for shyt. That's over two football fields. But if the big eyes are real and not just a made-up attempt to replicate TV aliens.....then they're probably just sunglasses.

Here are your aliens. Imagine at over two football fields away and then look at those kids' descriptions again. One of the kids even said the alien looked like MJ:

If you really want to get into the weeds, here's a couple posts by the French cognitive psychologist Gilles Fernandez (you need to use Google translate). He goes through the entire sequence of events to show how hysteria and suggestion leads to changes in the narrative and false memories.

Rencontre rapprochée à Ariel School, Ruwa, Zimbabwe 1994 ? Quelques Contre-Tons...

Ce billet est une synthèse d'un travail collectif commencé en 2010/2011. Il n'aurait pas été rendu possible sans les analyses de certains ...

skepticversustheflyingsaucers.blogspot.com

Ariel Case, Zimbabwe (1994): A neglected Hypothesis or disregarded Assumption... (In French).

* ** **** (Version de Travail mise en ligne et sujette à modifications) Un de nos billets et recherche la plus consultée sur c...

skepticversustheflyingsaucers.blogspot.com

 

[CobaltBlue]

Did you read the article or no? These links are even better, especially detailed with the timeline and specifics of initial events.

Ariel School

ARIEL SCHOOL

threedollarkit.weebly.com

Ariel Analysis

ARIEL SCHOOL

threedollarkit.weebly.com

1. The reentry of the Zenit-2 rocket two nights before had created a light show over Africa, leading to hundreds of claimed UFO sightings across the country that everyone was talking about, including children. The 4th-grade class at Arial School specifically had a class discussion about UFOs the same week the sighting occurred. Several children reported a different UFO sighting the day before the main event, with a complete different-looking craft.


2. Some children during recess reported seeing an alien running around in the trees, with a UFO. The trees in question were at least 700 feet beyond the school boundary which was the furthest the children were allowed to go. Most children out at recess said they had seen nothing.


3. The intial interviewer, Cynthia Hind, was a UFO enthusiast who interviewed the children in groups (something you never do with eyewitnesses especially children, because it leads them to latch onto the other stories in their group) and almost certainly planted the ideas in their head.


4. Even with the group interviews, only a fraction of the children reported seeing something, while most children said nothing happened and no adults saw it. It's difficult to determine the exact number of actual eyewitnesses, but there are ~30 out of 250 children who have an interview statement attached to a name, and some of those 30 didn't see a UFO. 62 of the children made a drawing of the events, but many of the drawings are clearly copied from each other and no one spoke to these children to ask how many actually saw the thing and how many were just completing the assignmnet by copying.


5. Some children reported one man, some reported 2, some reported up to four. Some described him as a normal Black man but with long straight hair, while others reported one or more little gray aliens fitting the conventional description but wearing Black clothes. A few reported blank faces with no features. The descriptions fit into wildly different categories.

It seems almost definitive that the original sighting was of a long-haired mixed-race man, perhaps someone who looked slightly odd and thus surprised the white kids, and then the alien descriptors were added afterwards due to mass hysteria. They fit into basically three main categories, likely of kids who were copying each other's stories:

Remember that these sightings are occurring at 700+ feet away:




Notice that numerous children, in both the descriptions and the drawings, ONLY see a black man. They didn't see a UFO at all.

6. The second interviewer, UFO enthusiast John Mack, came 2.5 months later. Suddenly now the kids reported telepathic messages they had not reported before. Suddenly now the kids reported pro-environment messages they had not reported before. Does it surprise you that John Mack is a noted environmental activist?

I did read it. You’re just posting shyt at this point. This proves nothing. This is another man’s detailed speculation who shares the same skepticism as you.

I honestly don’t even feel like going point by point with you.

But basically, it’s like you’re expecting children to speak uniformly like some type of AI about what they witness. As though we aren’t all different and process and express things differently.