You can write whatever you want but it isn't grounded in reality. I would destroy any of you on a pOdcast. Your ats wrh whining idiots don't know up from down.
Pathetic ...... breh .... .. ... ...
America speaks:
Last edited:
You can write whatever you want but it isn't grounded in reality. I would destroy any of you on a pOdcast. Your ats wrh whining idiots don't know up from down.
He not getting it in the House and the Senate is split. Obama needs to take the L and move on. His a$$ shouldn't even be trying to bomb and start wars in the first place. He was elected off the 1st time originally off the strength he was suppose to Anti-War or intervention. He really pissed his base off with the Syria ish.
That's why he was elected?
This isnt the 1700's we cant sit on the sidelines.
breh ur somali waryah wise up and stop for mass murderers
as a fellow nfc north breh I respectfully ask you what do you have in mind for the sunni brehs who've been massacred over the last 2 years by Bashar.
unlike @Ritzy Sharon you better not say that the course of action should be inaction.
You know better than these gas price watchin domestic dictator stans.
my nicca deserves a smileyAmerica speaks:
Umm we didn't sit on the side-lines in the 1700's.
missed the point
"The common denominators of regional perceptions of CW use and U.S. intervention are the mistrust of American policy and the ranking of the United States and Israel as the two "biggest threats" facing the Middle East. These sentiments already dictate Arab public attitudes toward the general proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Namely, despite popular unease with Iran and outright animosity toward Tehran by some rulers, the majority of Arabs have consistently opposed international pressure to curtail Iran's nuclear program. Only a minority has said that a nuclear Iran would be bad for the region. And the angrier Arabs are toward the United States (and Israel), the more permissive they are toward Iran and its nuclear program.
Similarly, most Arabs have opposed U.S. action in Syria in large part because they see every American move as intended to serve suspicious interests. (Indeed, Arab public attitudes toward the U.S. role in Syria have not coincided nicely with the region's strong anti-Assad mood.) Even if the United States intervenes in Syria under humanitarian auspices, it will be seen as nefarious."