Like I said before, @CrimsonTider doesn't read anything unless it has to do with Alabama football or The Shade Room-like content. He isn't an intellectually curious person which is why he holds reactionary positions.
He won't change his ways and won't try to, which isn't that dissimilar from a Trump supporter.
Whats fukked is that is how most Americans tend to view these issues.
Downplaying this quote in order to highlight that people that committed misdemeanors weren’t re arrested doesn’t address this* I wrote a concise 1-paragraph, 4-sentence argument.
* Then a line making fun of you for being from Alabama and yet not knowing that already.
* Followed by 2 sentences recommending a book.
How the fukk do you have the time to write 74,000 comments but can't read? This is why you don't know shyt.
Will one of y’all explain what we’re suppose to do with information?
The one exception was for bail-eligible people who were released following recent violent felony arrests. The rate of rearrests for that cohort of offenders increased slightly.
No one thinks people committing misdemeanors should be locked up before trial if they can’t afford bail.
But this quote is directly from that article and it’s where the focus should be.