Even as a big Nintendo fan even the whole deal of BOTW disgusts me. It's $90 if you don't have an original switch & played it there. This game is fukking 8 years oldNo the real question is why do you keep deflecting whenever it's time to hold Nintendo accountable
Elden Ring on Switch 2 is including Shadow of the Erdtree btw, and that hasn't even been out for a whole year.
This Zelda DLC is almost 8 years old along with the base game![]()
I mean it ultimately depends on how much one values playing on handheld. If someone travels a lot for business, Switch being portable is a big plus. For some people who only play a TV, then obviously that aspect of the Switch holds little value.Seems like we have different arguments going on here.
Is the Switch 2 a clear step up from Switch 1? Yes, 100%.
Should the Switch 2 sell for more than Switch 1? Yes, since better tech will cost more $$$.
Is the Switch 2 worth the price? No, because you're paying a comparable price to a PS5/Series X but getting "lesser" tech.
It would be like if Sega kept the Saturn going until PS3/Xbox 360 dropped AND THEN dropped Sega Dreamcast but charged the same price as PS3/360.
No the real question is why do you keep deflecting whenever it's time to hold Nintendo accountable
Elden Ring on Switch 2 is including Shadow of the Erdtree btw, and that hasn't even been out for a whole year.
This Zelda DLC is almost 8 years old along with the base game![]()
How is it deflecting when I've told you I do not care.No the real question is why do you keep deflecting whenever it's time to hold Nintendo accountable
Elden Ring on Switch 2 is including Shadow of the Erdtree btw, and that hasn't even been out for a whole year.
This Zelda DLC is almost 8 years old along with the base game![]()
I’m sure they took trump changing the tariffs everyday into considerationFrom my understanding they decided on the price tag
before the tariffs![]()