Next wave of controversial cosmetic procedures: laser surgery to burn eye melanin, turns eyes blue

Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
737
Reputation
20
Daps
530
Is he white? I'm not sure of your or his race.

I've met a couple of black people with natural green (I think they were some sort of green) eyes. Don't know how rare that is. This was all the way back in elementary and middle school, and I haven't seen it since.
he's black. But lightskin (both parents) if that means anything....
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,692
Reputation
4,889
Daps
68,694
But most white people don't have this feature. Most people who use colored contacts, such as blue and green, have been white in my experience. Are they trying to be more white? Not knocking down your argument per se, just want to understand your logic.
Read The Bluest Eye and you'll understand.

The Bluest Eye is a 1970 novel by American author Toni Morrison. It is Morrison's first novel and was written while Morrison was teaching at Howard University and raising her two sons on her own.[1] The story is about a year in the life of a young black girl, named Pecola, who develops an inferiority complex due to her eye color and skin appearance in Lorain, Ohio, against the backdrop of America's Midwest as well as in the years following the Great Depression.

It is required in many schools for a reason. But realistically as my homie @2Quik4UHoes is stating, this is just a given to many of us.

Only blue we rock with is that forum blue and gold tho :mjpls:
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
Read The Bluest Eye and you'll understand.



It is required in many schools for a reason. But realistically as my homie @2Quik4UHoes is stating, this is just a given to many of us.

Only blue we rock with is that forum blue and gold tho :mjpls:


I understand very much the concept of minorities having to live up to the standard of beauty forced by white supremacy and media. I can even understand how some can feel upset that there exists a chance that minorities might do this to fit into the aforementioned standard.

I was merely pointing out that white people do the same. They tan, get perms, and I would be willing to bet that most people who wear blue/green contacts would probably be whites. I would be also willing to bet that most who get this procedure done will also be white.

What happens in that case?
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,692
Reputation
4,889
Daps
68,694
I understand very much the concept of minorities having to live up to the standard of beauty forced by white supremacy and media. I can even understand how some can feel upset that there exists a chance that minorities might do this to fit into the aforementioned standard.

I was merely pointing out that white people do the same. They tan, get perms, and I would be willing to bet that most people who wear blue/green contacts would probably be whites. I would be also willing to bet that most who get this procedure done will also be white.

What happens in that case?
The point is, it's that as far as inferiority about how they perceive themselves from an ethnic and skin tone perspective, it is clearly more endemic in minority communities. It is much larger business in India, Africa and places of that nature than it is anywhere in Europe. As we speak, there are people in Nigeria right now literally painting their lips pink. White people do not do the same to nearly the same extent, and when they do, it is more about being fashionable than feeling objectively inferior. In any given publication there are 10x the amount of people of their complexion (even if pale) than there are of people of color.

So the idea is that this may fit into the larger conception of products being used to meet European aesthetics. I also cannot say for certain if what you're saying about contacts is correct. Black women love color contacts. You're right that white people may use this too, I don't think any of us will dispute that.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
The point is, it's that as far as inferiority about how they perceive themselves from an ethnic and skin tone perspective, it is clearly more endemic in minority communities. It is much larger business in India, Africa and places of that nature than it is anywhere in Europe. As we speak, there are people in Nigeria right now literally painting their lips pink. White people do not do the same to nearly the same extent, and when they do, it is more about being fashionable than feeling objectively inferior. In any given publication there are 10x the amount of people of their complexion (even if pale) than there are of people of color.

Not denying anything you said here, but shouldn't the outrage be if we have evidence that this treatment is systematically being advertised or used by minorities to combat a false sense of inferiority?

I don't actually have an issue with the procedure, I don't find it controversial. It can be used in controversial ways I guess, but is there enough proof that this is the case?

So the idea is that this may fit into the larger conception of products being used to meet European aesthetics. I also cannot say for certain if what you're saying about contacts is correct. Black women love color contacts. You're right that white people may use this too, I don't think any of us will dispute that.

Again, I admitted that is was anecdotal on my part, but the vast majority of people I come across, of all races, the ones who used colored contacts the most were white people. You are likely exposed to a much larger set of black friends/family than I am, thus my perception might be skewed.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,389
Black folks who have blue eyes = mixing for sure.

The first blue eyed people were Africans who had a mutation in their DNA. While it's almost statistically rare, it has happened before and does not require mixing to occur.
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
The first blue eyed people were Africans who had a mutation in their DNA. While it's almost statistically rare, it has happened before and does not require mixing to occur.

From what I understand, the earliest blue-eyed people were near the Black Sea somewhere in Eurasia, not Africa. I've never seen a Black person with blue eyes who didn't clearly have some white ancestry. Do you have any proof?
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,389
From what I understand, the earliest blue-eyed people were near the Black Sea somewhere in Eurasia, not Africa. I've never seen a Black person with blue eyes who didn't clearly have some white ancestry. Do you have any proof?

Ever heard of adaption or evolution? The first people to populate Eurasia, and the rest of the world, were darker and more "African" than you or I. A mutation of a dominant allele into something less potent. We have the full genetic code, they don't. It's science.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,957
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Lots of people going in to get whitified :to:

Let me help you out by adding some intensity to the word "Lots" ........ the level of whitification throughout the world permeates deep ........ :mjpls:

ah man those Indians :wow:
those Koreans :banderas:
those Jamaicans/Dominicans :krs:
those African women :snoop:

roll up on a chinese with blue eyes like :wtf:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Ever heard of adaption or evolution? The first people to populate Eurasia, and the rest of the world, were darker and more "African" than you or I. A mutation of a dominant allele into something less potent. We have the full genetic code, they don't. It's science.

The reason I disagree with this is that blue eyes are a relatively new mutation. It's maybe only a little over 10 thousand years old. "White" looking people had already emerged by then. Also, there's no such thing as the "full genetic code"- evolution is a process, new things are added, and old things are subtracted. White people can't naturally be born with "black" hair anymore, but they also developed new traits that Black folks never had.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,389
The reason I disagree with this is that blue eyes are a relatively new mutation. It's maybe only a little over 10 thousand years old. "White" looking people had already emerged by then. Also, there's no such thing as the "full genetic code"- evolution is a process, new things are added, and old things are subtracted. White people can't naturally be born with "black" hair anymore, but they also developed new traits that Black folks never had.

A mutation of a gene isn't something new. It's an abnormality of a former version. Black's don't have that gene but have the base trait that could mutate into said phenotype. I'd wager Blacks have much more variety and possibility in their gene mutations than a White person...
 
Top