Netflix might have one: Making a Murderer (Dec 18th)
- Thread starter Shogun
- Start date
a murda
I love my wife brehs
Not one nikka in sight 
Last edited:
Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
If he was black duke woulda been shot before the first arrest. 
As is, he gets his privilege, the rest of them get a pretty entertaining show. 2 Americas.
As is, he gets his privilege, the rest of them get a pretty entertaining show. 2 Americas.
Drake is God
Sweeterman
boring
4North1Side2
Banned
Woooooooooooow!!!!!!! fukk them corrupt motherfukkers! I would shot and killed a few.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
This is quite possibly the best documentary I have ever seen.. well it helps that it's right in my wheelhouse but goddamn this case is interesting as fukk. The two lawyers in the Avery case are immensely talented. They are gonna eat heavy off this. If you need representation, they are the guys you want 
Can't be said enough, fukk the police man
Can't be said enough, fukk the police man
unless its recorded
you can get an inmate to say anything for alittle privilege
Last edited:
Ya just like how that fuk boy Brendan confessed right?unless its recorded
I fuked up though guys. I googled Steven Avery and read his wikipedia after episode 4 last night
i aint even finishing the last two episodes. shyt pissed me off maynedumbss fukkin kid and corrupt ass cops.
I googled how it turns out and now i'm so disgusted I don't wanna watch the rest.
Might binge watch this this weekend.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
Don't read if you haven't completed this.
I hated the victim's brother. He's a piece of shyt. I understand his sister was killed by SOMEONE but that doesn't change the fact that I want to slap him in the fukking mouth.
So basically the cops are FEEDING this disabled kid a narrative and he's agreeing with it because he doesn't understand he is confessing. The way his mind operates is that if he says what he thinks the cops want to hear then he gets to go home. It's criminal what they did to that kid. I can't understand how the judges, they are supposed to be intelligent people, how do they not see that the kid is mentally incapable of answering their line of questioning?
Now, you might ask.. if Steven didn't kill the woman then who did. That's a fair question but that's not the question that should be circulating around in the jury room. I want to know who broke into the 1985 case files and stole his blood samples. How are we going to just sweep that fact under the rug? There is enough doubt between that and the key that they found days later right in the middle of plain view that I would have held the entire jury up. The three stubborn jurors I probably would have socked in the mouth.
My theory is that Steven didn't commit this crime. I think the police had tunnel vision and more than that the ex-boyfriend and roommate had access to that property through the search team effort. I think the ex-boyfriend killed her and since he was well aware of the search effort to be conducted at the Avery's residence he planted the bones and the vehicle and then sent his cousin to "find" the vehicle on the property. Then the corrupt police planted evidence to make sure the charge stuck. The ex-boyfriend erased angry voicemails he left. He had her password. He probably left threatening voicemails.
That's what happened.
I hated the victim's brother. He's a piece of shyt. I understand his sister was killed by SOMEONE but that doesn't change the fact that I want to slap him in the fukking mouth.
So basically the cops are FEEDING this disabled kid a narrative and he's agreeing with it because he doesn't understand he is confessing. The way his mind operates is that if he says what he thinks the cops want to hear then he gets to go home. It's criminal what they did to that kid. I can't understand how the judges, they are supposed to be intelligent people, how do they not see that the kid is mentally incapable of answering their line of questioning?
Now, you might ask.. if Steven didn't kill the woman then who did. That's a fair question but that's not the question that should be circulating around in the jury room. I want to know who broke into the 1985 case files and stole his blood samples. How are we going to just sweep that fact under the rug? There is enough doubt between that and the key that they found days later right in the middle of plain view that I would have held the entire jury up. The three stubborn jurors I probably would have socked in the mouth.
My theory is that Steven didn't commit this crime. I think the police had tunnel vision and more than that the ex-boyfriend and roommate had access to that property through the search team effort. I think the ex-boyfriend killed her and since he was well aware of the search effort to be conducted at the Avery's residence he planted the bones and the vehicle and then sent his cousin to "find" the vehicle on the property. Then the corrupt police planted evidence to make sure the charge stuck. The ex-boyfriend erased angry voicemails he left. He had her password. He probably left threatening voicemails.
That's what happened.
breh that tension before the verdict had me so shook, felt like i was on trial. should have fought them urges at least until the his verdict