Netanyahu: World has no "moral right" to stop Israel from attacking Iran

Julius Skrrvin

I be winkin' through the scope
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
16,319
Reputation
3,275
Daps
30,742
Netanyahu Says World Has No 'Moral Right' To Stop Israel From Attacking Iran : The Two-Way : NPR

Comments from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are ratcheting up diplomatic tension between Israel and the United States.

During a joint press conference in Jerusalem with Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov, Netanyahu expressed his frustration with how world powers are handling Iran and its nuclear program.

"The world tells Israel 'wait, there's still time'. And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel," Netanyahu said.

He added: "Now if Iran knows that there is no red line. If Iran knows that there is no deadline, what will it do? Exactly what it's doing. It's continuing, without any interference, towards obtaining nuclear weapons capability and from there, nuclear bombs."
:dwillhuh:

From Tel Aviv, Lourdes Garcia-Navarro tells our Newscast desk this is the latest in "an increasingly strident and public war of words with the United States."

Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but Israel and others say Iran is chasing nuclear weapons capabilities.

As The Washington Post notes, despite the fact that Netanyahu did not name the United States, he was reacting to an interview given by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over the weekend. Clinton said that the U.S. is "not setting deadlines" and that diplomacy is the best way forward when it comes to Iran.

This also comes on the heels of a report from the AP that says the International Atomic Energy Agency has found that over the past month, "Iran has moved further toward the ability to build a nuclear weapon."

The New York Times reports that Netanyahu criticized the U.S. approach to Iran, specifically the long list of sanctions meant to encourage Iran to comply with demands from the United Nations.

"The fact is that every day that passes, Iran gets closer and closer to nuclear bombs," Netanyahu said according to the Times.

The Times also notes that it is unclear what "red lines" mean for Israel. It reports:
"In general, for Israel, the red line would be Iran achieving the capability to produce nuclear weapons in a location invulnerable to Israeli attack. But Israeli officials have long said that the Israeli and American "clocks" tick at a different pace on Iran. The United States, for example, could wait longer to launch an attack and could have a deeper reach because of its superior military capabilities.

"Israeli experts say that for Israel, all the previous red lines have been crossed already and that setting more lines might be meaningless, because international intelligence agencies may not know immediately if Iran has overstepped them."
Bradley Burston, of Haaretz, has an interesting read on the politics of it all. Netanyahu, he said, is betting that President Obama will lose the elections this coming November and Mitt Romney will embrace a more hawkish stance. :aicmon:

But, Burston writes, Netanyahu made that bet when Obama was "on the ropes." Now that Obama is surging, Burston says he hopes Netanyahu recalibrates and that he does so quickly.
 

Gallo

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,982
Reputation
115
Daps
2,106
Reppin
NULL
I wish we had the balls to tell him go ahead, but you are on your own on this one. We are going to stay outnof this completely. Im tired of losing American lives to provide cover for this country.

If we go to war with Iran, it will be reminiscent of the first gulf war and not the second. The vast majority of military casualties during the second gulf war occurred during occupation. We won't be occupying Iran, Obama won't do it. At worst we'll get a Bush 1 type invasion, quick in and out where we lost less than 400 coalition troops. Leaving them completely neutered and crippled with no fly zones and extreme oil for food type sanctions. Best case scenario we let Israel drop a few bombs. Iran don't want it either way.

The people I feel bad for are the Iranian citizens, they're getting fukked.
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,291
Reppin
W/S 416
If we go to war with Iran, it will be reminiscent of the first gulf war and not the second. The vast majority of military casualties during the second gulf war occurred during occupation. We won't be occupying Iran, Obama won't do it. At worst we'll get a Bush 1 type invasion, quick in and out where we lost less than 400 coalition troops. Leaving them completely neutered and crippled with no fly zones and extreme oil for food type sanctions. Best case scenario we let Israel drop a few bombs. Iran don't want it either way.

The people I feel bad for are the Iranian citizens, they're getting fukked.

thats the best case scenerio

worse case scenerio is those shias go out guns blazing. i dont think theyll do that tho...depends on whether the regime remains intact after the attack
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
29,367
Reputation
5,139
Daps
129,452
Reppin
NULL
If we go to war with Iran, it will be reminiscent of the first gulf war and not the second. The vast majority of military casualties during the second gulf war occurred during occupation. We won't be occupying Iran, Obama won't do it. At worst we'll get a Bush 1 type invasion, quick in and out where we lost less than 400 coalition troops. Leaving them completely neutered and crippled with no fly zones and extreme oil for food type sanctions. Best case scenario we let Israel drop a few bombs. Iran don't want it either way.

The people I feel bad for are the Iranian citizens, they're getting fukked.

How can you keep falling for the same neocon tricks? First of all, we would be in this virtually alone. Other nations are not going to fight with us. Secondly, if Romney is president, weapons of mass destruction or the capability to produce such weapons would become the rationale for regime change. And Iran is not going to be a push over.

I can't believe we are actually having a conversation about starting another war in the ME.
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,805
Daps
152,087
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
If we go to war with Iran, it will be reminiscent of the first gulf war and not the second. The vast majority of military casualties during the second gulf war occurred during occupation. We won't be occupying Iran, Obama won't do it. At worst we'll get a Bush 1 type invasion, quick in and out where we lost less than 400 coalition troops. Leaving them completely neutered and crippled with no fly zones and extreme oil for food type sanctions. Best case scenario we let Israel drop a few bombs. Iran don't want it either way.

The people I feel bad for are the Iranian citizens, they're getting fukked.

You sound like a complete moron, who gets his "facts" from mainstream media. An iranian invasion would be a extremely difficult and protracted war. It would not be some overnight bullshyt victory like Iraq was. The Iranian army is extremely well funded and well armed. An Iranian invasion would likely result in an extended battle with millions dead and even more displaced. Furthermore, its highly likely that both Russia and China would covertly back an Iranian military, further lengthening the war. An Iranian invasion could easily develop into WWIII and we dont need to go there.

WAR IS BAD! fukk WHAT THE MEDIA IS SPOON FEEDING YOU!
 

Gallo

Banned
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
1,982
Reputation
115
Daps
2,106
Reppin
NULL
How can you keep falling for the same neocon tricks? First of all, we would be in this virtually alone. Other nations are not going to fight with us. Secondly, if Romney is president, weapons of mass destruction or the capability to produce such weapons would become the rationale for regime change. And Iran is not going to be a push over.

I can't believe we are actually having a conversation about starting another war in the ME.

They said iraq wouldn't be a pushover. It wasn't for lack of trying. Frankly, the military might of the US would overwhelm anything Iran could muster, they will be sitting ducks once their air and radar defenses are eliminated.

Romney is not occupying either. America doesn't have the stomach for it. We were running a fever pitch after 9/11 the current environment won't allow for occupation, or probably even an invasion. This is strictly hypothetical.

As for my hawkishness. Meh.
 
Top