Neil deGrasse Tyson: Science and Religion Are Not ‘Reconcilable,’ So Stop Trying

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,446
Reputation
3,888
Daps
108,091
Reppin
Detroit
Sure, that's why I got educated on the subject and use both historical textual criticism and form criticism.​



It hasn't been 'debatable' since Augustine's exegesis in the 4th Century CE up until the Scopes Monkey Trial in the 20's which birthed 'Creationism'.

Unless you're speaking to a fundamentalist/Creationist your critique is a waste of thought.​

The vast, vast majority of Christians worldwide don't consider Genesis to be a didactic poem.

Unless you want to say that they're all fundamentalists...what exactly makes your opinion the definitive interpretation?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,284
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
acri1 said:
The vast, vast majority of Christians worldwide don't consider Genesis to be a didactic poem.

The vast, vast majority of Christians don't view it as history (as we know it) and understand the 'teaching' imparted through the text.​

acri said:
what exactly makes your opinion the definitive interpretation?

Form criticism, reading the text in the proper context, and reading the works of Rudolph Bultmann, Karl Barth, Dale B. Martin and Bart D. Ehrman to name a few.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,643
Reppin
humans
I agree to an extent. Ultimately, both have path that fall back on determining philosophical questions about the universe but only one of these philosophical disciplines tell you that all the answers have already been provided. This seems like a cop-out.

Also, it's unfair to lump all the religions together. His critiques for sure apply to the Abrahamic Religions and several others but not so much for some of the eastern ones. The eastern religions are much more rooted in philosophical, scientific and logical sources. Of course, at times science negates these Eastern religious teachings, but the followers are much more willing to accept it.



dalai-lama-science.png
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
“Educated religious people are perfectly fine with that,” he said. “It’s the fundamentalists who want to say that the Bible is the literal truth of God and want to see the Bible as a science textbook who are knocking on the science doors of schools… Enlightened religious people are not acting that way.”

Tyson said that a “free country” means that people can believe whatever they want: “Think that there’s one God, two Gods, ten Gods, or no Gods.” But once those people start to enter the science classroom, that’s when he has a problem. “I’m not telling you what to think,” he said. “I’m just telling you in the science class, ‘You’re not doing science. This is not science. Keep it out.’”
i agree. Religion is not science, there are fairly accurate ways to read the bible and believe in sciencem sadly too many religious folks abide by a too strict and literal a reading of the bible and that's sad.
 
Top