Your juelzing is out of control right now.When at least Mike actually worked up said talent and took on talent that James would not even actually look at in comparison via even the current eye test.
When James had seen Wiggins in his own camps.
Yet still in his small bball iq was incapable of ramping or undertaking ramping the player. Whereas Mike had a proven rubrick that worked on three all stars. When in comparison LeBron never ramped a said all star in his charge and out of his charge to all star player without him present.
MJ "took on" that talent? MJ had a "proven rubric" that he used to develop players in the late 1980s? Only it was a special rubric where he had to be gone for the player to realize his true potential?
You're starting your own "MJ the GM" and "MJ the developmental coach" narrative 30 years after the fact.
Ricky Davis? Darius Miles? Did you just accuse 18-year-old Lebron of failing to develop two vets who were traded away 2 months into Lebron's rookie year?Nor has he taken an all star Calibur player present like Ricky Davis to the promised Land like magic and Mike did with numerous Ayers. Nor did James ramp miles, z, don'yell Marshall to Jamison whom all had as high of pedigree as brown. So you jumping to cite Mike failure with brown. Is far and away in timeline failure if bron with similar number one pedigreed style parts.
You KNOW that your argument is wack when the best talent you can find for Lebron to develop was two perennial underperforming losers who only played with Lebron for a couple months when he was a teenager.
Then Z? Name-droppiong a guy who was 10 years older than rookie Lebron? Z was injured and before Lebron could legally buy alcohol.
Marshall? Jamison? Two guys who were 32yo vets when they joined the Cavs?
This is like claiming that Jordan didn't do enough with Dave Greenwood, Steve Johnson, and Ron Harper.