Wrong. And you don't show that anywhere.
I should not have to eliminate wrong based statements made incomplete misleading fashion. Yet since you wanna get clowned just starting out. In basic premise and timeline fashion. Your comparison makes no sense. As one Jordan was a former exec coming down from office.
taking on a straight from high school pedigreed talent. Where as Wiggins is a college pedigreed talent, whom was not acquired on James watch. not to mention, bron jettisonned wiggins because he admitted he fails to ramp players and said he wanted love because he was already ready. which was a lie, when love got fujiwara'd out the playoffs by a white boi named kelly of all things.
Plus James ignorantly jettisoned away and also jettisoned away a unit that could on paper compete for a nba title, immediately.
When at least Mike actually worked up said talent and took on talent.
that James would not even actually look at in comparison via even the current eye test.
When James had seen Wiggins in his own camps.
Yet still in his small bball iq was incapable of ramping or undertaking ramping the player. Whereas Mike had a proven rubrick that worked on three all stars. When in comparison LeBron never ramped a said all star in his charge and out of his charge to all star player without him present.
Nor has he taken an all star Calibur player present like Ricky Davis to the promised Land like magic and Mike did with numerous players. Nor did James ramp miles, z, don'yell Marshall to Jamison whom all had as high of pedigree as brown. So you jumping to cite Mike failure with brown. Is far and away in timeline failure to bron with similar number one pedigreed style parts.
so,...we can continue this tablin....
But just waiting on you to submit in this opening. As it is easy to table your nonsense.
I can move to a terminal to get rid of you since you think you tough trying to dissect points like you know wtf you talembout. Only time in eight seven you watched Jordan was as a Cleveland old guard homer before and after the first of three shots in the playoffs and a seventy nine point drubbiing punk.
Stop.
The Dankster said:
Wrong, that happened during Jordan's playing career. Are we saying now that only certain Jordan years count and not others?
all the years count and i can easily point out the difference in jordan's playing years from start and accolades based on skill play. that easily over shadow the inferior skill player in lebron james. including how it relates to resume and the end conclusion.
something of which i know you don't comprehend at all.
which i will showcase you don't know wtf you talembou at all.
by exposing you next quote to show in full depth.
you have no cognitive awareness of the argument of the goat.
nor the numerous arguments around the goat.
just around your simple idiot based answer quote next i will bold.
The Dankster said:
That doesn't make any sense.
you said this does make any sense in response to this quote.
ART BARR said:
In any context from the bird misappropriation of bill Russell from the Boston and eastern seaboard media. To falsely crown bird over the real social and sporting impact of Russell as a celtic.
this easily shows you don't know anything associated around wtf the actual goat argument is and how michael jordan saw that argument and re-took the mantle to mean the actual best skill player wholeheartedly. which was a complete departure to crown bird the all time basketball goat based on deflecting the greatness of russell onto bird and false magnifying it.
your bolded response proves you don't even know the goat argument to even be posting about or talking about it at all.
you sir are done, and if you want i will continue to give you another tabling.
after i go over more of your bullshyt.
i am on a real terminal i can type this out in one hunid and twenty second, nikka.
ya done.
The Dankster said:
You're mixing metaphors. And if you claim that LeBron had a duty which and power that no superstar has ever had, it's not deflecting for me to simply point out that MJ couldn't do it either.
I closed this out previously in exposing how short sighted and far from well versed you are on the topic of michael jordan as a skill player in an admin setting by simple timeline, already.
this long wannabe breakdown of my rant by your bullshyt two sentences cause you don't know the source material at all. is easily exposed.
art barr
False, I've been watching Jordan since 1987, when everyone thought he was incapable of elevating his team and was being accused of not being a real leader. It wasn't until Phil Jackson came on that the Bulls gelled like that and the rest of them really showed out.
if you been watching since 87, then you saw jordan elevate his teammates play playing point guard and averaging a triple double.
so, yousa lie. to say it took phil for mike to elevate their play.
as back then it was level to this shyt and in eighty seven mike was elevating a perrenial loser to off level team based finishes period.
you forgetting mike had galvanized help already.
till it was jettisoned for the weaker cartwright, by that bean counter.
which in mythos is written to given some credence to krause as an admin.
when, krause had no idea wtf he was doing.
of which mike socially clowned him for, brutally and rightfully so.
again, talking bullshyt and you don't know.
Dankster said:
Wrong, as you would know if you found your glasses and even remembered which poster I am.
u're a nobody, breh.
the dankster said:
This makes no sense, take your damn meds.
This is not only untrue but you don't explain how you came to that conclusion at all, you're just rambling.
You seem to not even understand logical progressions. If Jordan is much better than LeBron, it STRENGTHENS my argument, because all I'm saying is that LeBron can't be expected to do what even Jordan was unable to do.
You're also using "moving the goal posts" wrong.
cofefe? Your mind lost track of things again.
Did you just have a stroke?
I'm unclear on what you're arguing - are you trying to say that Jordan didn't really care during his Wizards days and wasn't trying? There's so much fluff surrounding your arguments here that it creates a distraction.
It's really weird to take the development of three players and, without every evidence at all, attribute it to Jordan. Especially when all three had their best season when Jordan was gone.
You're talking about two top-10 picks and a #18 pick, all of whom were well-picked and successful from early in their career. LeBron was never around for the development of so much top talent. The closest group would have been Kyrie, TT, and Dion, but he wasn't around for a lot of their development as players and two of them were pretty mediocre picks for their spot anyways. What other talent was ever out their for him?
Take your meds shabazz.
again, all this is deflection cause you don't know the actual mythos of the goat argument.
nor do you enen know the goat argument at all.
plus, if your so-called hinted of idea is lebron is not qualified to even be the goat.
why are you even trying to continue to cite these offbrand made in error far from timeline comparison based rants.
which have no real logical base.
nor context if you know either the timeline of jordan and bron.
you are on bullshyt, and if i ever see you try to deflect like i don't know wtf i am talembout ever again. like i had a heart attack, or take some bullshyt white hippie offbrand powder based drugs. i don't do cluck drugs, nikka. yousa lame to even think a black man of my professional stature would even ever consume that being from my gen you goofie.
plus, if you know the streets in a real urban setting.
you know damn well no forty year old nikka who on shyt for real like me.
has ever violated the rules of the games on simple shyt.
you offbrand and probably from the burbs, breh.
if i see you try that shyt again...on that whooptie..
you catching that fukk'n table, nikka.
art barr