NBA Legend Paul Pierce Arguing With Spicy Arabial About Wifin Hoes

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,223
Reputation
1,467
Daps
31,114
Reppin
Houston TX
Paul is a goofy but even a broken clock is right twice a day. I think he hit the nail on the head. Old people that need a partner to look after them, and lower income folks that need a partner to survive in this economy benefit the most from marriage. For any other man, you're taking a serious risk, and in many cases the downsides far outweigh the positives.

He's right but most people are poor enough where a partner makes sense, want to raise kids in a two parent home, or will get old someday. (Unless you're going to wait until you're old to find a caregiver, i mean wife)

I'd say he's right for the 1%ers or maybe 10%ers and his logic appeals to people who view themselves that way.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,482
Reputation
8,890
Daps
170,565
That's another topic.

But let's say we are in Jamie's position. Let's say we meet a gold digger, but she still does her wife and motherly duties. At that point she earned her piece of the pie.:yeshrug:Now if the man marries a woman who just lays on her back, that's 100% on the man.



Honestly I think the gold digger angle is overblown. A vast majority of women want love at the end of the day. Money only goes so far, especially when they get up in age.
You wildin
 
Top