Nate Robinson KNOCKED OUT!!!! vs Jake Paul.

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,652
Reputation
2,972
Daps
77,948
Reppin
NULL
Celebs always lie about their height, breh. There's a website that's pretty obsessed with estimating celebs' real height and they have Nate at just under 5'8.

Nate Robinson Height.

Hes 5”9 bruh. For one, Jim Jones is not anywhere near 5”7 and Nate is almost eye level with him.
412102-DF-71-DF-44-C2-A3-C7-54-B6-F0-C9-AD08.jpg


For two, Nate looks only two or three inches shorter than Isaiah Thomas who is 6”1. If he was really 5”7, the height difference would be more visible. Ludacris however is 5”7, it shows and Nate is taller than him.

6589-B86-F-508-F-4-AF0-BF9-C-4645143-A49-AC.jpg
 

EndGame

Superstar
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
9,083
Reputation
611
Daps
48,100
Yeah, regardless of what their real height is, Paul still has an easy 3 inches on Nate, plus years of training on top of that. It wasn't even fair and Nate was honestly a fool for taking that fight.
Wasn't it Nate who called him out? There are weight classes for a reason.
 

CarbonBraddock

You will be trolled
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
17,171
Reputation
8,203
Daps
80,819
Can't stand when a black man loses to one of these white mufukkas. Same thing as when that wilder fakkit lost his last fight. Someone need to spit in robinson's face for this insult to the black race. pathetic.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
44,239
Reputation
-35,116
Daps
244,589
Hes 5”9 bruh. For one, Jim Jones is not anywhere near 5”7 and Nate is almost eye level with him. For two, Nate looks only two or three inches shorter than Isaiah Thomas who is 6”1. If he was really 5”7, the height difference would be more visible. Ludacris however is 5”7, it shows and Nate is taller than him.

412102-DF-71-DF-44-C2-A3-C7-54-B6-F0-C9-AD08.jpg


6589-B86-F-508-F-4-AF0-BF9-C-4645143-A49-AC.jpg


In NBA draft camp Nates official height without shoes was 5’7.5”.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,652
Reputation
2,972
Daps
77,948
Reppin
NULL
i dont know why it says 5.9 cause
google. 1.75 m to feet. and it says 5.7. its wiki after all.

and yea i got jake and logan mixed up. they look the same to me :manny:

but this aint skinny.

skysports-jake-paul-logan-paul_5132213.jpg



and he is the crazier of the 2.

Hes average. If you asked people a month ago whether he would’ve knocked out Nate, we would’ve all said hell nah. Because the thought was inconceivable. Nate has been a PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE for almost two decades. Even if it’s a different sport, he should be on another level in terms of physical shape compared to someone who started amateur fighting 700 days ago. He could’ve trained and made up the difference to make it competitive at least but he didn’t.
 
Top